If we have a CMOV, OR and AND combination such as:
if (x & CN)
y |= CM;
And:
* CN is a single bit;
* All bits covered by CM are known zero in y;
Then we can convert this to a sequence of BFI instructions. This will always be a win if CM is a single bit, will always be no worse than the TST & OR sequence if CM is two bits, and for thumb will be no worse if CM is three bits (due to the extra IT instruction).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252057 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When converting an alias to a non-alias when the aliasee is not
imported, ensure that the linkage type is set to external so that it is
a valid linkage type. Added a test case that exposed this issue.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252054 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The x86 "sitofp i64 to double" dag combine, in 32-bit mode, lowers sitofp
directly to X86ISD::FILD (or FILD_FLAG). This should not be done in soft-float mode.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252042 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was breaking the modules build and is being reverted while we reach consensus on the right way to solve this layering problem. This reverts commit r251785.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252040 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: On Windows we have to take UTF16 encoded env vars and convert them to UTF8. This patch fixes CopyEnvironment helper function used by process unit tests.
Reviewers: yaron.keren
Subscribers: yaron.keren, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14278
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Intended to make later changes simpler. Exposes
`getBundleOperandsStartIndex` and `getBundleOperandsEndIndex`, and uses
them for the computation in `getNumTotalBundleOperands`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is no point in having invoke safepoints handled differently than the
call safepoints. All relevant decisions could be made by looking at whether
or not gc.result and gc.relocate lay in a same basic block. This change will
allow to lower call safepoints with relocates and results in a different
basic blocks. See test case for example.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14158
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252028 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The functions use LAI and MemoryDepChecker classes so they need to be
defined after those definitions outside of the Dependence class.
Will be used by the LoopLoadElimination pass.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13257
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A profile of an LTO link of Chrome revealed that we were spending some
~30-50% of execution time in the function Constant::getRelocationInfo(),
which is called from TargetLoweringObjectFile::getKindForGlobal() and in turn
from TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix().
It turns out that we only need the result of getKindForGlobal() when
targeting Mach-O, so this change moves the relevant part of the logic to
TargetLoweringObjectFileMachO.
NFCI.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14168
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The printed name and the parsed assembler names weren't the same.
I'm not sure which name SC prints these as, but I think it's this one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the requested SGPR was not actually aligned, it was
accepted and rounded down instead of rejected.
Also fix an assert if the range is an invalid size.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are actually 104 so 2 were missing.
More assembler tests with high register number tuples
will be included in later patches.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251999 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Introduce DIPrinter which takes care of rendering DILineInfo and
friends. This allows LLVMSymbolizer class to return a structured data
instead of plain std::strings.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251989 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Make printDILineInfo and friends responsible for just rendering the
contents of the structures, demangling should actually be performed
earlier, when we have the information about the originating
SymbolizableModule at hand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251981 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
XOP has the VPCMOV instruction that performs the common vector bit select operation OR( AND( SRC1, SRC3 ), AND( SRC2, ~SRC3 ) )
This patch adds tablegen pattern matching for this instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8841
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251975 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
When the dependence distance in zero then we have a loop-independent
dependence from the earlier to the later access.
No current client of LAA uses forward dependences so other than
potentially hitting the MaxDependences threshold earlier, this change
shouldn't affect anything right now.
This and the previous patch were tested together for compile-time
regression. None found in LNT/SPEC.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13255
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Before this change, we didn't use to collect forward dependences since
none of the current clients (LV, LDist) required them.
The motivation to also collect forward dependences is a new pass
LoopLoadElimination (LLE) which discovers store-to-load forwarding
opportunities across the loop's backedge. The pass uses both lexically
forward or backward loop-carried dependences to detect these
opportunities.
The new pass also analyzes loop-independent (forward) dependences since
they can conflict with the loop-carried dependences in terms of how the
data flows through memory.
The newly added test only covers loop-carried forward dependences
because loop-independent ones are currently categorized as NoDep. The
next patch will fix this.
The two patches were tested together for compile-time regression. None
found in LNT/SPEC.
Note that with this change LAA provides all dependences rather than just
"interesting" ones. A subsequent NFC patch will remove the now trivial
isInterestingDependence and rename the APIs.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: jmolloy, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13254
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251972 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
