Summary:
Allow IntToPtrInst to carry !dereferenceable metadata tag.
This is valid since !dereferenceable can be only be applied to
pointer type values.
Change-Id: If8a6e3c616f073d51eaff52ab74535c29ed497b4
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64954
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366826 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Implement IR intrinsics for stack tagging. Generated code is very
unoptimized for now.
Two special intrinsics, llvm.aarch64.irg.sp and llvm.aarch64.tagp are
used to implement a tagged stack frame pointer in a virtual register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64172
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@366360 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset include this code, where ByteOffset
and GEPOffset are both of type llvm::APInt :
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.getSExtValue();
The problem with this line is that getSExtValue() returns an int64_t, but
the += matches an overload for uint64_t. The problem is that the resulting
APInt is no longer considered to be signed. That in turn causes assertion
failures later on if the relevant pointer type is > 64 bits in width and
the GEPOffset was negative.
Changing it to
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.sextOrTrunc(ByteOffset.getBitWidth());
resolves the issue and explicitly performs the sign-extending
or truncation. Additionally, instead of asserting later if the result
is > 64 bits, it breaks out of the loop in that case.
See also
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24729https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
This commit must be merged after D38662 in order for the test to pass.
Patch by Michael Ferguson <mpfergu@gmail.com>.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38501
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were two combines not covered by the check before now, neither of which
actually differed from normal in the benefit analysis.
The most recent seems to be because it was just added at the top of the
function (naturally). The older is from way back in 2008 (r46687) when we just
didn't put those checks in so routinely, and has been diligently maintained
since.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341831 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently ComputeNumSignBits does early exit while processing some
of the operations (add, sub, mul, and select). This prevents the
function from using AssumptionCacheTracker if passed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49759
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch is crucial for proving equality laundered/stripped
pointers. eg:
bool foo(A *a) {
return a == std::launder(a);
}
Clang with -fstrict-vtable-pointers will emit something like:
define dso_local zeroext i1 @_Z3fooP1A(%struct.A* %a) {
entry:
%c = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
%call = tail call i8* @llvm.launder.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %c)
%0 = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
%1 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %0)
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %call)
%cmp = icmp eq i8* %1, %2
ret i1 %cmp
}
and because %2 can be replaced with @llvm.strip.invariant.group(%0)
and that %2 and %1 will produce the same value (because strip is readnone)
we can replace compare with true.
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, majnemer, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47423
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch changes order of transform in InstCombineCompares to avoid
performing transforms based on ranges which produce complex bit arithmetics
before more simple things (like folding with constants) are done. See PR37636
for the motivating example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48584
Reviewed By: spatel, lebedev.ri
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Patch for capture tracking broke
bootstrap of clang with -fstict-vtable-pointers
which resulted in debbugging nightmare. It was fixed
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46900 but as it turned
out, there were other parts like inliner (computing of
noalias metadata) that I found after bootstraping with enabled
assertions.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith, chandlerc, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47088
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
invariant.group.launder should not stop propagation
of nonnull and dereferenceable, because e.g. we would not be
able to hoist loads speculatively.
Reviewers: rsmith, amharc, kuhar, xbolva00, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46972
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@332788 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The value tracking analysis uses function alignment to infer that the
least significant bits of function pointers are known to be zero.
Unfortunately, this is not correct for ARM targets: the least
significant bit of a function pointer stores the ARM/Thumb state
information (i.e., the LSB is set for Thumb functions and cleared for
ARM functions).
The original approach (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44781) introduced a
new field for function pointer alignment in the DataLayout structure
to address this. But it seems unlikely that optimizations based on
function pointer alignment would bring much benefit in practice to
justify the additional maintenance burden, so this patch simply
assumes that function pointer alignment is always unknown.
Reviewers: javed.absar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, hfinkel, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46110
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@331025 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We're getting bug reports:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35807https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35840https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36045
...where we blow up the stack in value tracking because other passes are sending
in selects that have an operand that is itself the select.
We don't currently have a reliable way to avoid analyzing dead code that may take
non-standard forms, so bail out when things go too far.
This mimics the recursion depth limitations in other parts of value tracking.
Unfortunately, this pushes the underlying problems for other passes (jump-threading,
simplifycfg, correlated-propagation) into hiding. If someone wants to uncover those
again, the first draft of this patch on Phab would do that (it would assert rather
than bail out).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42442
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@323331 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
As suggested by Eli Friedman, don't try to handle array allocas here,
because of possible overflows, instead rely on instcombine converting
them to allocations of array types.
Reviewers: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41398
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@321159 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ValueTracking has to strike a balance when attempting to propagate information
backwards from assumes, because if the information is trivially propagated
backwards, it can appear to LLVM that the assumption is known to be true, and
therefore can be removed.
This is sound (because an assumption has no semantic effect except for causing
UB), but prevents the assume from allowing further optimizations.
The isEphemeralValueOf check exists to try and prevent this issue by not
removing the source of an assumption. This tries to make it a little bit more
general to handle the case of side-effectful instructions, such as in
%0 = call i1 @get_val()
%1 = xor i1 %0, true
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %1)
Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36590
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
causing compile time issues.
Moreover, the patch *deleted* the flag in addition to changing the
default, and links to a code review that doesn't even discuss the flag
and just has an update to a Clang test case.
I've followed up on the commit thread to ask for numbers on compile time
at this point, leaving the flag in place until things stabilize, and
pointing at specific code that seems to exhibit excessive compile time
with this patch.
Original commit message for r310583:
"""
[ValueTracking] Enabling ValueTracking patch by default (recommit). Part 2.
The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on
non-negative integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777,
r284022). But was disabled by default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
""""
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310816 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on non-negative
integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777, r284022). But was disabled by
default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34101
Patch by: Olga Chupina <olga.chupina@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310583 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Note that the non-splat lshr+lshr test folded, but that does not
work in general. Something is missing or wrong in computeKnownBits
as the non-splat shl+shl test still shows.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@288005 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently LLVM assumes that a pointer addrspacecasted to a different addr space is equivalent to trunc or zext bitwise, which is not true. For example, in amdgcn target, when a null pointer is addrspacecasted from addr space 4 to 0, its value is changed from i64 0 to i32 -1.
This patch teaches LLVM not to assume known bits of addrspacecast instruction to its operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26803
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@287545 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We were trying to add APInt values with different bit sizes after
visiting an addrspacecast instruction which changed the bit width
of the pointer.
Reviewers: majnemer, hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24774
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@285407 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
While walking defs of pointer operands we were assuming that the pointer
size would remain constant. This is not true, because addresspacecast
instructions may cast the pointer to an address space with a different
pointer width.
This partial reverts r282612, which was a more conservative solution
to this problem.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, apilipenko
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283557 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The computeKnownBits and ComputeNumSignBits functions in ValueTracking can now do a simple look-through of ExtractElement.
Reviewers: majnemer, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24955
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@283434 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Change some of the internal interfaces in Loads.cpp to keep track of the
number of bytes we're trying to prove dereferenceable using an explicit
`Size` parameter.
Before this, the `Size` parameter was implicitly inferred from the
pointee type of the pointer whose dereferenceability we were trying to
prove, causing us to be conservative around bitcasts. This was
unfortunate since bitcast instructions are no-ops and should never
break optimizations. With an explicit `Size` parameter, we're more
precise (as shown in the test cases), and the code is simpler.
We should eventually move towards a `DerefQuery` struct that groups
together a base pointer, an offset, a size and an alignment; but this
patch is a first step.
Reviewers: apilipenko, dblaikie, hfinkel, reames
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20764
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@271406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As part of r251146 InstCombine was extended to call computeKnownBits on
every value in the function to determine whether it happens to be
constant. This increases typical compiletime by 1-3% (5% in irgen+opt
time) in my measurements. On the other hand this case did not trigger
once in the whole llvm-testsuite.
This patch introduces the notion of ExpensiveCombines which are only
enabled for OptLevel > 2. I removed the check in InstructionSimplify as
that is called from various places where the OptLevel is not known but
given the rarity of the situation I think a check in InstCombine is
enough.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16835
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263047 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This experiment was originally about trying to use facts implied dominating conditions to infer more precise known bits. While the compile time was found to be acceptable on several large code bases, we never found sufficiently profitable examples to justify turning on the code by default. Given this, it's time to abandon the experiment.
Several folks have commented that they've found this useful for experimentation, but nothing has come of those experiments. Given how easy the patch is to apply, there's no reason to leave the code in tree.
For anyone interested in further investigation in this area, I recommend finding the summary email I sent on one of the original review threads. In particular, I now believe the use-list based approach is strictly worse than the dom-tree-walking approach.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@262646 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Ryan Taylor