As agreed in post-commit review of r265388, I'm switching the flag to
its original value until the 90% runtime performance regression on
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Bubblesort is addressed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@277524 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is incorrect to compare TripCount (which is BECount + 1)
with extraiters (or Count) to check if we should enter unrolled
loop or not, because TripCount can potentially overflow
(when BECount is max unsigned integer).
While comparing BECount with (Count - 1) is overflow safe and
therefore correct.
Reviewer: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19256
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267662 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Don't spend the entire iteration space in the scalar loop prologue if
computing the trip count overflows. This change also gets rid of the
backedge check in the prologue loop and the extra check for
overflowing trip-count.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7715
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@229731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently LoopUnroll generates a prologue loop before the main loop
body to execute first N%UnrollFactor iterations. Also, this loop is
used if trip-count can overflow - it's determined by a runtime check.
However, we've been mistakenly optimizing this loop to a linear code for
UnrollFactor = 2, not taking into account that it also serves as a safe
version of the loop if its trip-count overflows.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
