We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Since now Scalar Evolution can create non-add rec expressions for PHI
nodes, it can also create SCEVConstant expressions. This will confuse
replaceCongruentPHIs, which previously relied on the fact that SCEV
could not produce constants in this case.
We will now replace the node with a constant in these cases - or avoid
processing the Phi in case of a type mismatch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14230
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251938 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Commit 251839 triggers miscompiles on some bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/builds/13723
(The commit is listed in 13722, but due to an existing failure introduced in
13721 and reverted in 13723 the failure is only visible in 13723)
To verify r251839 is indeed the only change that triggered the buildbot failures
and to ensure the buildbots remain green while investigating I temporarily
revert this commit. At the current state it is unclear if this commit introduced
some miscompile or if it only exposed code to Polly that is subsequently
miscompiled by Polly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251857 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first attempt got a test failure on ARM. This patch is updated to try to fix the failure (more specifically, by handling the case when VF=1).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8943
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.
Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.
I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
Before:
BB#0:
mr 4, 3
extsh. 3, 4
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
cmpwi 3, 99
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 10
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#4:
li 3, 1
blr
.LBB0_5:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 65436
beq 0, .LBB0_13
BB#6:
cmplwi 3, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#7:
cmplwi 3, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_12
BB#8:
li 3, 4
blr
.LBB0_9:
rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31 <--- 32-bit mask/extend
cmplwi 3, 100
beq 0, .LBB0_14
...
After:
BB#0:
rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31 <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
cmpwi 4, 999
ble 0, .LBB0_5
BB#1:
lis 3, 0
ori 3, 3, 65525
cmpw 4, 3
bgt 0, .LBB0_9
BB#2:
cmplwi 4, 1000
beq 0, .LBB0_14
BB#3:
cmplwi 4, 65436
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#4:
li 3, 6
blr
.LBB0_5:
li 3, 0
cmplwi 4, 1
beqlr 0
BB#6:
cmplwi 4, 10
beq 0, .LBB0_12
BB#7:
cmplwi 4, 100
bne 0, .LBB0_13
BB#8:
li 3, 2
blr
.LBB0_9:
cmplwi 4, 65526
beq 0, .LBB0_15
BB#10:
cmplwi 4, 65535
bne 0, .LBB0_13
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251849 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251839 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Prevent `createNodeFromSelectLikePHI` from creating SCEV expressions
that break LCSSA.
A better fix for the same issue is to teach SCEVExpander to not break
LCSSA by inserting PHI nodes at appropriate places. That's planned for
the future.
Fixes PR25360.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The initial coverage checking code for sample records failed to count
records inside inlined profiles. This change fixes the oversight.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
attribute is not present.
During my refactor in r251595 I changed the behavior of optimizeSqrt(),
skipping the transformation if the function wasn't marked with unsafe-fp-math
attribute. This fixed a bug, as confirmed by Sanjay (before the optimization
was silently executed anyway), although it wasn't my primary aim.
This commit adds a test to ensure the code doesn't break again.
Reported by: Marcello Maggioni
Discussed with: Sanjay Patel
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a really straightforward port. Also adds a test for the pass,
since it only seemed to be tested tangentially before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251689 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Somewhat shockingly for an analysis pass which is computing constant ranges, LVI did not understand the ranges provided by range metadata.
As part of this change, I included a change to CVP primarily because doing so made it much easier to write small self contained test cases. CVP was previously only handling the non-local operand case, but given that LVI can sometimes figure out information about instructions standalone, I don't see any reason to restrict this. There could possibly be a compile time impact from this, but I suspect it should be minimal. If anyone has an example which substaintially regresses, please let me know. I could restrict the block local handling to ICmps feeding Terminator instructions if needed.
Note that this patch continues a somewhat bad practice in LVI. In many cases, we know facts about values, and separate context sensitive facts about values. LVI makes no effort to distinguish and will frequently cache the same value fact repeatedly for different contexts. I would like to change this, but that's a large enough change that I want it to go in separately with clear documentation of what's changing. Other examples of this include the non-null handling, and arguments.
As a meta comment: the entire motivation of this change was being able to write smaller (aka reasonable sized) test cases for a future patch teaching LVI about select instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13543
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251606 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Follow on to http://reviews.llvm.org/D13074, implementing something pointed out by Sanjoy. His truth table from his comment on that bug summarizes things well:
LHS | RHS | LHS >=s RHS | LHS implies RHS
0 | 0 | 1 (0 >= 0) | 1
0 | 1 | 1 (0 >= -1) | 1
1 | 0 | 0 (-1 >= 0) | 0
1 | 1 | 1 (-1 >= -1) | 1
The key point is that an "i1 1" is the value "-1", not "1".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13756
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251597 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The most common use case is when eliminating redundant range checks in an example like the following:
c = a[i+1] + a[i];
Note that all the smarts of the transform (the implication engine) is already in ValueTracking and is tested directly through InstructionSimplify.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251596 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251592 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the flag -mllvm -sample-profile-check-coverage=N to the
SampleProfile pass. N is the percent of input sample records that the
user expects to apply. If the pass does not use N% (or more) of the
sample records in the input, it emits a warning.
This is useful to detect some forms of stale profiles. If the code has
drifted enough from the original profile, there will be records that do
not match the IR anymore.
This will not detect cases where a sample profile record for line L is
referring to some other instructions that also used to be at line L.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If P branches to Q conditional on C and Q branches to R conditional on
C' and C => C' then the branch conditional on C' can be folded to an
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13972
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251557 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251492 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The singleton !range metadata gets simplified more aggressively after a
later change, so change the !range metadata to contain more than one
element.
While at it, turn some `; CHECK` s to `; CHECK-LABEL:` s.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251485 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CatchReturnInst has side-effects: it runs a destructor. This destructor
could conceivably run forever/call exit/etc. and should not be removed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
AliasSetTracker does not need to convert the access mode to ModRefAccess if the
new visited UnknownInst has only 'REF' modrefinfo to existing pointers in the
sets.
Patch by Andrew Zhogin!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A PHI on a catchpad might be used by both edges out of the catchpad,
feeding back into a loop. In this case, just use the insertion point.
Anything more clever would require new basic blocks or PHI placement.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change could be way off-piste, I'm looking for any feedback on whether it's an acceptable approach.
It never seems to be a problem to gobble up as many reduction values as can be found, and then to attempt to reduce the resulting tree. Some of the workloads I'm looking at have been aggressively unrolled by hand, and by selecting reduction widths that are not constrained by a vector register size, it becomes possible to profitably vectorize. My test case shows such an unrolling which SLP was not vectorizing (on neither ARM nor X86) before this patch, but with it does vectorize.
I measure no significant compile time impact of this change when combined with D13949 and D14063. There are also no significant performance regressions on ARM/AArch64 in SPEC or LNT.
The more principled approach I thought of was to generate several candidate tree's and use the cost model to pick the cheapest one. That seemed like quite a big design change (the algorithms seem very much one-shot), and would likely be a costly thing for compile time. This seemed to do the job at very little cost, but I'm worried I've misunderstood something!
Reviewers: nadav, jmolloy
Subscribers: mssimpso, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14116
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently, when the SLP vectorizer considers whether a phi is part of a reduction, it dismisses phi's whose incoming blocks are not the same as the block containing the phi. For the patterns I'm looking at, extending this rule to allow phis whose incoming block is a containing loop latch allows me to vectorize certain workloads.
There is no significant compile-time impact, and combined with D13949, no performance improvement measured in ARM/AArch64 in any of SPEC2000, SPEC2006 or LNT.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mcrosier, nadav
Subscribers: mssimpso, nadav, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14063
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Certain workloads, in particular sum-of-absdiff loops, can be vectorized using SLP if it can treat select instructions as reduction values.
The test case is a bit awkward. The AArch64 cost model needs some tuning to not be so pessimistic about selects. I've had to tweak the SLP threshold here.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mzolotukhin, spatel, nadav
Subscribers: nadav, mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13949
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When emitting a remark for a conditional branch annotation, the remark
uses the line location information of the conditional branch in the
message. In some cases, that information is unavailable and the
optimization would segfaul. I'm still not sure whether this is a bug or
WAI, but the optimizer should not die because of this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251420 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Davide Italiano