Previously, subprograms contained a metadata reference to the function they
described. Because most clients need to get or set a subprogram for a given
function rather than the other way around, this created unneeded inefficiency.
For example, many passes needed to call the function llvm::makeSubprogramMap()
to build a mapping from functions to subprograms, and the IR linker needed to
fix up function references in a way that caused quadratic complexity in the IR
linking phase of LTO.
This change reverses the direction of the edge by storing the subprogram as
function-level metadata and removing DISubprogram's function field.
Since this is an IR change, a bitcode upgrade has been provided.
Fixes PR23367. An upgrade script for textual IR for out-of-tree clients is
attached to the PR.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14265
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252219 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
inalloca variables were not treated as static allocas, therefore didn't
participate in regular stack instrumentation. We don't want them to
participate in dynamic alloca instrumentation as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were correctly skipping dbginfo intrinsics and terminators, but the initial bailout wasn't, causing it to bail out on almost any block.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252152 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Remove the loop over the uses of the CallSite in ArgumentUsesTracker.
Since we have the `Use *` for actual argument operand, we can just use
pointer subtraction.
The time complexity remains the same though (except for a vararg
argument) -- `std::advance` is O(UseIndex) for the ArgumentList
iterator.
The real motivation is to make a later change adding support for operand
bundles simpler.
Reviewers: reames, chandlerc, nlewycky
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14363
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252141 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
With this change, instrumentation code and reader/write
code related to profile data structs are kept strictly
in-sync. THis will be extended to cfe and compile-rt
references as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13843
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252113 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can often end up with conditional stores that cannot be speculated. They can come from fairly simple, idiomatic code:
if (c & flag1)
*a = x;
if (c & flag2)
*a = y;
...
There is no dominating or post-dominating store to a, so it is not legal to move the store unconditionally to the end of the sequence and cache the intermediate result in a register, as we would like to.
It is, however, legal to merge the stores together and do the store once:
tmp = undef;
if (c & flag1)
tmp = x;
if (c & flag2)
tmp = y;
if (c & flag1 || c & flag2)
*a = tmp;
The real power in this optimization is that it allows arbitrary length ladders such as these to be completely and trivially if-converted. The typical code I'd expect this to trigger on often uses binary-AND with constants as the condition (as in the above example), which means the ending condition can simply be truncated into a single binary-AND too: 'if (c & (flag1|flag2))'. As in the general case there are bitwise operators here, the ladder can often be optimized further too.
This optimization involves potentially increasing register pressure. Even in the simplest case, the lifetime of the first predicate is extended. This can be elided in some cases such as using binary-AND on constants, but not in the general case. Threading 'tmp' through all branches can also increase register pressure.
The optimization as in this patch is enabled by default but kept in a very conservative mode. It will only optimize if it thinks the resultant code should be if-convertable, and additionally if it can thread 'tmp' through at least one existing PHI, so it will only ever in the worst case create one more PHI and extend the lifetime of a predicate.
This doesn't trigger much in LNT, unfortunately, but it does trigger in a big way in a third party test suite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252051 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252032 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The goal of this pass is to perform store-to-load forwarding across the
backedge of a loop. E.g.:
for (i)
A[i + 1] = A[i] + B[i]
=>
T = A[0]
for (i)
T = T + B[i]
A[i + 1] = T
The pass relies on loop dependence analysis via LoopAccessAnalisys to
find opportunities of loop-carried dependences with a distance of one
between a store and a load. Since it's using LoopAccessAnalysis, it was
easy to also add support for versioning away may-aliasing intervening
stores that would otherwise prevent this transformation.
This optimization is also performed by Load-PRE in GVN without the
option of multi-versioning. As was discussed with Daniel Berlin in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9548, this is inferior to a more loop-aware
solution applied here. Hopefully, we will be able to remove some
complexity from GVN/MemorySSA as a consequence.
In the long run, we may want to extend this pass (or create a new one if
there is little overlap) to also eliminate loop-indepedent redundant
loads and store that *require* versioning due to may-aliasing
intervening stores/loads. I have some motivating cases for store
elimination. My plan right now is to wait for MemorySSA to come online
first rather than using memdep for this.
The main motiviation for this pass is the 456.hmmer loop in SPECint2006
where after distributing the original loop and vectorizing the top part,
we are left with the critical path exposed in the bottom loop. Being
able to promote the memory dependence into a register depedence (even
though the HW does perform store-to-load fowarding as well) results in a
major gain (~20%). This gain also transfers over to x86: it's
around 8-10%.
Right now the pass is off by default and can be enabled
with -enable-loop-load-elim. On the LNT testsuite, there are two
performance changes (negative number -> improvement):
1. -28% in Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog: the length of the
critical paths is reduced
2. +2% in Polybench/stencils/adi: Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce this
outside of LNT
The pass is scheduled after the loop vectorizer (which is after loop
distribution). The rational is to try to reuse LAA state, rather than
recomputing it. The order between LV and LLE is not critical because
normally LV does not touch scalar st->ld forwarding cases where
vectorizing would inhibit the CPU's st->ld forwarding to kick in.
LoopLoadElimination requires LAA to provide the full set of dependences
(including forward dependences). LAA is known to omit loop-independent
dependences in certain situations. The big comment before
removeDependencesFromMultipleStores explains why this should not occur
for the cases that we're interested in.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel
Subscribers: junbuml, dberlin, mssimpso, rengolin, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13259
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252017 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Commit 251839 triggers miscompiles on some bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/builds/13723
(The commit is listed in 13722, but due to an existing failure introduced in
13721 and reverted in 13723 the failure is only visible in 13723)
To verify r251839 is indeed the only change that triggered the buildbot failures
and to ensure the buildbots remain green while investigating I temporarily
revert this commit. At the current state it is unclear if this commit introduced
some miscompile or if it only exposed code to Polly that is subsequently
miscompiled by Polly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251901 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This restores commit r251837, with the new library dependence added to
llvm-link/Makefile to address bot failures.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251866 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
To be able to maximize the bandwidth during vectorization, this patch provides a new flag vectorizer-maximize-bandwidth. When it is turned on, the vectorizer will determine the vectorization factor (VF) using the smallest instead of widest type in the loop. To avoid increasing register pressure too much, estimates of the register usage for different VFs are calculated so that we only choose a VF when its register usage doesn't exceed the number of available registers.
This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first attempt got a test failure on ARM. This patch is updated to try to fix the failure (more specifically, by handling the case when VF=1).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8943
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r251837, due to a number of bot failures of the form:
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to
'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::create(llvm::MemoryBufferRef,
llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*, bool)'
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.obj/tools/llvm-link/Release+Asserts/llvm-link.o:llvm-link.cpp:function
loadIndex(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::Module const*): error: undefined
reference to 'llvm::object::FunctionIndexObjectFile::takeIndex()'
I'm not sure why these are happening - I added Object to the requred
libraries in tools/llvm-link/LLVMBuild.txt and the LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS
in tools/llvm-link/CMakeLists.txt. Confirmed for my build that these
symbols come out of libLLVMObject.a. What am I missing?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds support to check if a loop has loop invariant conditions which lead to loop exits. If so, we know that if the exit path is taken, it is at the first loop iteration. If there is an induction variable used in that exit path whose value has not been updated, it will keep its initial value passing from loop preheader. We can therefore rewrite the exit value with
its initial value. This will help remove phis created by LCSSA and enable other optimizations like loop unswitch.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13974
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251839 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Support for necessary linkage changes and symbol renaming during
ThinLTO function importing.
Also includes llvm-link support for manually importing functions
and associated llvm-link based tests.
Note that this does not include support for intelligently importing
metadata, which is currently imported duplicate times. That support will
be in the follow-on patch, and currently is ignored by the tests.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph, davidxl
Subscribers: tobiasvk, tejohnson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13515
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251837 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
SCEV Predicates represent conditions that typically cannot be derived from
static analysis, but can be used to reduce SCEV expressions to forms which are
usable for different optimizers.
ScalarEvolution now has the rewriteUsingPredicate method which can simplify a
SCEV expression using a SCEVPredicateSet. The normal workflow of a pass using
SCEVPredicates would be to hold a SCEVPredicateSet and every time assumptions
need to be made a new SCEV Predicate would be created and added to the set.
Each time after calling getSCEV, the user will call the rewriteUsingPredicate
method.
We add two types of predicates
SCEVPredicateSet - implements a set of predicates
SCEVEqualPredicate - tests for equality between two SCEV expressions
We use the SCEVEqualPredicate to re-implement stride versioning. Every time we
version a stride, we will add a SCEVEqualPredicate to the context.
Instead of adding specific stride checks, LoopVectorize now adds a more
generic SCEV check.
We only need to add support for this in the LoopVectorizer since this is the
only pass that will do stride versioning.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, hfinkel, rengolin, jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13595
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The initial coverage checking code for sample records failed to count
records inside inlined profiles. This change fixes the oversight.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a really straightforward port. Also adds a test for the pass,
since it only seemed to be tested tangentially before.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
from its pass harness by providing a lambda to query for AA results.
This allows the legacy pass to easily provide a lambda that uses the
special helpers to construct function AA results from a legacy CGSCC
pass. With the new pass manager (the next patch) the lambda just
directly wraps the intuitive query API.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251715 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251689 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Update the discriminator assignment algorithm
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
* If a scope has already been assigned a discriminator, do not reassign a nested discriminator for it.
* If the file and line both match, even if the column does not match, we should assign a new discriminator for the stmt.
original code:
; #1 int foo(int i) {
; #2 if (i == 3 || i == 5) return 100; else return 99;
; #3 }
; i == 3: discriminator 0
; i == 5: discriminator 2
; return 100: discriminator 1
; return 99: discriminator 3
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251680 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
transformations in FunctionAttrs rather than building a new one each
time.
This isn't trivial because there are different heuristics from different
passes for exactly what set they want. The primary difference is whether
an *overridable* function completely disables the synthesis of
attributes. I've modeled this by directly testing for overridable, and
using the common set that excludes external and opt-none functions.
This does cause some changes by disabling more optimizations in the face
of opt-none. Specifically, we were still optimizing *calls* to opt-none
functions based on their attributes, just not the bodies. It seems
better to be conservative on both fronts given the intended semanticas
here (best effort to not assume or disturb anything). I've not tried to
test this change as it seems complex, brittle, and not important to the
implicit contract of opt-none. Instead, it seems more like a choice that
should be dictated by the simplified implementation and the change to be
acceptable differences within the space of opt-none.
A big benefit here is that these transformations no longer rely on the
legacy pass manager's SCC types, they just work on generic sets of
function pointers. This will make it easy to re-use their logic in the
new pass manager.
I've also made the transforms static functions instead of members where
trivial while I was touching the signatures.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251640 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch unify the 39-bit and 42-bit mapping for aarch64 to use only
one instrumentation algorithm. This removes compiler flag
SANITIZER_AARCH64_VMA requirement for MSAN on aarch64.
The mapping to use now is for 39 and 42-bits:
0x00000000000ULL-0x01000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x01000000000ULL-0x02000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x02000000000ULL-0x03000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x03000000000ULL-0x04000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x04000000000ULL-0x05000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x05000000000ULL-0x06000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x06000000000ULL-0x07000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x07000000000ULL-0x08000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And only for 42-bits:
0x08000000000ULL-0x09000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x09000000000ULL-0x0A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x0A000000000ULL-0x0B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x0B000000000ULL-0x0F000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x0F000000000ULL-0x10000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x10000000000ULL-0x11000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x11000000000ULL-0x12000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x12000000000ULL-0x17000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x17000000000ULL-0x18000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x18000000000ULL-0x19000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x19000000000ULL-0x20000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x20000000000ULL-0x21000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x21000000000ULL-0x26000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x26000000000ULL-0x27000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x27000000000ULL-0x28000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x28000000000ULL-0x29000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x29000000000ULL-0x2A000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2A000000000ULL-0x2B000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2B000000000ULL-0x2C000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x2C000000000ULL-0x2D000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x2D000000000ULL-0x2E000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x2E000000000ULL-0x2F000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x2F000000000ULL-0x39000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x39000000000ULL-0x3A000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3A000000000ULL-0x3B000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3B000000000ULL-0x3C000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
0x3C000000000ULL-0x3D000000000ULL MappingDesc::INVALID
0x3D000000000ULL-0x3E000000000ULL MappingDesc::SHADOW
0x3E000000000ULL-0x3F000000000ULL MappingDesc::ORIGIN
0x3F000000000ULL-0x40000000000ULL MappingDesc::APP
And although complex it provides a better memory utilization that
previous one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251624 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Somewhat shockingly for an analysis pass which is computing constant ranges, LVI did not understand the ranges provided by range metadata.
As part of this change, I included a change to CVP primarily because doing so made it much easier to write small self contained test cases. CVP was previously only handling the non-local operand case, but given that LVI can sometimes figure out information about instructions standalone, I don't see any reason to restrict this. There could possibly be a compile time impact from this, but I suspect it should be minimal. If anyone has an example which substaintially regresses, please let me know. I could restrict the block local handling to ICmps feeding Terminator instructions if needed.
Note that this patch continues a somewhat bad practice in LVI. In many cases, we know facts about values, and separate context sensitive facts about values. LVI makes no effort to distinguish and will frequently cache the same value fact repeatedly for different contexts. I would like to change this, but that's a large enough change that I want it to go in separately with clear documentation of what's changing. Other examples of this include the non-null handling, and arguments.
As a meta comment: the entire motivation of this change was being able to write smaller (aka reasonable sized) test cases for a future patch teaching LVI about select instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13543
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251606 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The most common use case is when eliminating redundant range checks in an example like the following:
c = a[i+1] + a[i];
Note that all the smarts of the transform (the implication engine) is already in ValueTracking and is tested directly through InstructionSimplify.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13040
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251596 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
