Previously the InstCombiner class contained a pointer to an IR builder that had been passed to the constructor. Sometimes this would be passed to helper functions as either a pointer or the pointer would be dereferenced to be passed by reference.
This patch makes it a reference everywhere including the InstCombiner class itself so there is more inconsistency. This a large, but mechanical patch. I've done very minimal formatting changes on it despite what clang-format wanted to do.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@307451 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/i8Q
A narrow bitwise logic op is obviously better than math for value tracking,
and zext is better than sext. Typically, the 'not' will be folded into an
icmp predicate.
The IR difference would even survive through codegen for x86, so we would see
worse code:
https://godbolt.org/g/C14HMF
one_or_zero(int, int): # @one_or_zero(int, int)
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpl %esi, %edi
setle %al
retq
one_or_zero_alt(int, int): # @one_or_zero_alt(int, int)
xorl %ecx, %ecx
cmpl %esi, %edi
setg %cl
movl $1, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
retq
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@306243 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This matches the behavior we already had for compares and makes us consistent everywhere.
Reviewers: dberlin, hfinkel, spatel
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33604
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@305049 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These methods are specifically optimized to only counting leading zeros without an additional uint64_t compare.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@304876 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Merge overflow computation for signed add,
appearing both in InstCombine and ValueTracking.
As part of the merge,
cleanup the interface for overflow checks in InstCombine.
Patch by Yoav Ben-Shalom.
Reviewers: craig.topper, majnemer
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: takuto.ikuta, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32946
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is another step towards favoring 'not' ops over random 'xor' in IR:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32706
This transformation may have occurred in longer IR sequences using computeKnownBits,
but that could be much more expensive to calculate.
As the scalar result shows, we do not currently favor 'not' in all cases. The 'not'
created by the transform is transformed again (unnecessarily). Vectors don't have
this problem because vectors are (wrongly) excluded from several other combines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch introduces a new KnownBits struct that wraps the two APInt used by computeKnownBits. This allows us to treat them as more of a unit.
Initially I've just altered the signatures of computeKnownBits and InstCombine's simplifyDemandedBits to pass a KnownBits reference instead of two separate APInt references. I'll do similar to the SelectionDAG version of computeKnownBits/simplifyDemandedBits as a separate patch.
I've added a constructor that allows initializing both APInts to the same bit width with a starting value of 0. This reduces the repeated pattern of initializing both APInts. Once place default constructed the APInts so I added a default constructor for those cases.
Going forward I would like to add more methods that will work on the pairs. For example trunc, zext, and sext occur on both APInts together in several places. We should probably add a clear method that can be used to clear both pieces. Maybe a method to check for conflicting information. A method to return (Zero|One) so we don't write it out everywhere. Maybe a method for (Zero|One).isAllOnesValue() to determine if all bits are known. I'm sure there are many other methods we can come up with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32376
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301432 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is logic to track the expected number of instructions
produced. It thought in this case an instruction would
be necessary to negate the result, but here it folded
into a ConstantExpr fneg when the non-undef value operand
was cancelled out by the second fsub.
I'm not sure why we don't fold constant FP ops with undef currently,
but I think that would also avoid this problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301199 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bug was introduced by r301018 "[InstCombine] fadd double (sitofp x), y check that the promotion is valid". The patch didn't expect that fadd can be on vectors not necessarily scalars. Add vector support along with the test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@301070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
getSignBit is a static function that creates an APInt with only the sign bit set. getSignMask seems like a better name to convey its functionality. In fact several places use it and then store in an APInt named SignMask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32108
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@300363 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In one case I removed commute handling for a multiply with a constant since we'll eventually get the constant on the right hand side.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@299863 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This is my first time using the commutable matchers so wanted to make sure I was doing it right.
Are there any other matcher tricks to further shrink this? Can we commute the whole match so we don't have to LHS and RHS separately?
Reviewers: davide, spatel
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31680
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@299840 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Calling computeKnownBits on the RHS should allows us to recurse one step further. isMask is equivalent to the isPowerOf2(C+1) except in the case where C is all ones. But that was already handled earlier by creating a not which is an Xor with all ones. So this should be fine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@299710 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Notably, no regression tests change when we remove these calls, and these are expensive calls.
The motivation comes from the general acknowledgement that the compiler is getting slower:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109188.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-December/108279.html
And specifically the test case attached to PR32037:
https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32037
Profiling the middle-end (opt) part of the compile:
$ ./opt -O2 row_common.bc -o /dev/null
...visitAdd and visitSub are near the top of the instcombine list, and the calls to SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits()
are high within each of those. Those calls account for 1%+ of the opt time in either debug or release profiles. And
that's the rough win I see from this patch when testing opt built release from r295864 on an iMac with Haswell 4GHz
(model 4790K).
It seems unlikely that we'd be able to eliminate add/sub or change their operands given that add/sub normally affect
all bits, and the PR32037 example shows no IR difference after this change using -O2.
Also worth noting - the code comment in visitAdd:
// This handles stuff like (X & 254)+1 -> (X&254)|1
...isn't true. That transform is handled later with a call to haveNoCommonBitsSet().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30270
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@295898 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some of the callers are artificially limiting this transform to integer types;
this should make it easier to incrementally remove that restriction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@291620 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We can perform the following:
(add (zext (add nuw X, C1)), C2) -> (zext (add nuw X, C1+C2))
This is only possible if C2 is negative and C2 is greater than or equal to negative C1.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We correctly canonicalized (add (sext x), (sext y)) to (sext (add x, y))
where possible. However, we didn't perform the same canonicalization
for zexts or for muls.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@290733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@289756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The pattern may look more obviously like a sext if written as:
define i32 @g(i16 %x) {
%zext = zext i16 %x to i32
%xor = xor i32 %zext, 32768
%add = add i32 %xor, -32768
ret i32 %add
}
We already have that fold in visitAdd().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22477
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@276035 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
