It's causing some buildbots to timeout whenever tablegen needs re-compilation,
particularly those with -fsanitize=memory but not only them. A compile time
regression was expected since it triples the amount of SelectionDAG rules we
are able to import but it's currently too high.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Re-applying now that PR32825 which was raised on the commit this fixed up is now known to have also been fixed by this commit.
Original commit message:
Multiple ldr pseudoinstructions with the same constant value will
reuse the same constant pool entry. However, if the constant pool
is explicitly flushed with a .ltorg directive, we should not try
to reference constants in the previous pool any longer, since they
may be out of range.
This fixes assembling hand-written assembler source which repeatedly
loads the same constant value, across a binary size larger than the
pc-relative fixup range for ldr instructions (4096 bytes). Such
assembler source already uses explicit .ltorg instructions to emit
constant pools with regular intervals. However if we try to reuse
constants emitted in earlier pools, they end up out of range.
This makes the output of the testcase match what binutils gas does
(prior to this patch, it would fail to assemble).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32847
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303540 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Re-applying now that the open bug on this commit, PR32825, is known to be fixed.
Original commit message:
Summary: This patch returns the same label if the CP entry with the same value has been created.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rengolin, jmolloy
Subscribers: majnemer, jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25804
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r302416. This was a fixup for r286006, which has now been reverted so this doesn't apply (either in concept or in code).
This commit itself has no problems, but the underlying issue it was fixing has now disappeared from the codebase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-symbolizer would fail to symbolize addresses in unlinked object
files when handling .dwo file data because the addresses would not be
relocated in the same way as the ranges in the skeleton CU in the object
file.
Fix that so object files can be symbolized the same as executables.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a re-application of a r303497 that was reverted in r303498.
I thought it had broken a bot when it had not (the breakage did not
go away with the revert).
This change makes the split between the "exact" backedge taken count
and the "maximum" backedge taken count a bit more obvious. Both of
these are upper bounds on the number of times the loop header
executes (since SCEV does not account for most kinds of abnormal
control flow), but the latter is guaranteed to be a constant.
There were a few places where the max backedge taken count *was* a
non-constant; I've changed those to compute constants instead.
At this point, I'm not sure if the constant max backedge count can be
computed by calling `getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax()` without
losing precision. If it can, we can simplify even further by making
`getMaxBackedgeTakenCount` a thin wrapper around
`getBackedgeTakenCount` and `getUnsignedRange`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303531 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change makes the split between the "exact" backedge taken count
and the "maximum" backedge taken count a bit more obvious. Both of
these are upper bounds on the number of times the loop header
executes (since SCEV does not account for most kinds of abnormal
control flow), but the latter is guaranteed to be a constant.
There were a few places where the max backedge taken count *was* a
non-constant; I've changed those to compute constants instead.
At this point, I'm not sure if the constant max backedge count can be
computed by calling `getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax()` without
losing precision. If it can, we can simplify even further by making
`getMaxBackedgeTakenCount` a thin wrapper around
`getBackedgeTakenCount` and `getUnsignedRange`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Refactor the strlen optimization code to work for both strlen and wcslen.
This especially helps with programs in the wild where people pass
L"string"s to const std::wstring& function parameters and the wstring
constructor gets inlined.
This also fixes a lingerind API problem/bug in getConstantStringInfo()
where zeroinitializers would always give you an empty string (without a
length) back regardless of the actual length of the initializer which
did not work well in the TrimAtNul==false causing the PR mentioned
below.
Note that the fixed getConstantStringInfo() needed fixes to SelectionDAG
memcpy lowering and may lead to some cases for out-of-bounds
zeroinitializer accesses not getting optimized anymore. So some code
with UB may produce out of bound memory reads now instead of just
producing zeros.
The refactoring "accidentally" fixes http://llvm.org/PR32124
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32839
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a complicated bug involving two issues:
1. What do we do with phi nodes when we prove all arguments are not
live?
2. When is it safe to use value leaders to determine if we can ignore
an argumnet?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303453 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was originally reverted because it was a breaking a bunch
of bots and the breakage was not surfacing on Windows. After much
head-scratching this was ultimately traced back to a bug in the
lit test runner related to its pipe handling. Now that the bug
in lit is fixed, Windows correctly reports these test failures,
and as such I have finally (hopefully) fixed all of them in this
patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303446 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch adds udiv/sdiv/urem/srem/udivrem/sdivrem methods that can divide by a uint64_t. This makes division consistent with all the other arithmetic operations.
This modifies the interface of the divide helper method to work on raw arrays instead of APInts. This way we can pass the uint64_t in for the RHS without wrapping it in an APInt. This required moving all the Quotient and Remainder allocation handling up to the callers. For udiv/urem this was as simple as just creating the Quotient/Remainder with the right size when they were declared. For udivrem we have to rely on reallocate not changing the contents of the variable LHS or RHS is aliased with the Quotient or Remainder APInts. We also have to zero the upper bits of Remainder and Quotient that divide doesn't write to if lhsWords/rhsWords is smaller than the width.
I've update the toString method to use the new udivrem.
Reviewers: hans, dblaikie, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33310
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303431 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a squash of ~5 reverts of, well, pretty much everything
I did today. Something is seriously broken with lit on Windows
right now, and as a result assertions that fire in tests are
triggering failures. I've been breaking non-Windows bots all
day which has seriously confused me because all my tests have
been passing, and after running lit with -a to view the output
even on successful runs, I find out that the tool is crashing
and yet lit is still reporting it as a success!
At this point I don't even know where to start, so rather than
leave the tree broken for who knows how long, I will get this
back to green, and then once lit is fixed on Windows, hopefully
hopefully fix the remaining set of problems for real.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were using a BumpPtrAllocator to allocate stable storage for
a record, then trying to insert that into a hash table. If a
collision occurred, the bytes were never inserted and the
allocation was unnecessary. At the cost of an extra hash
computation, check first if it exists, and only if it does do
we allocate and insert.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303407 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r303383.
This breaks the modules-enabled macOS build with:
lib/Support/LockFileManager.cpp:86:7: error: declaration of 'gethostuuid' must be imported from module 'Darwin.POSIX.unistd' before it is required
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Merging PDBs is a feature that will be used heavily by
the linker. The functionality already exists but does not
have deep test coverage because it's not easily exposed through
any tools. This patch aims to address that by adding the
ability to merge PDBs via llvm-pdbdump. It takes arbitrarily
many PDBs and outputs a single PDB.
Using this new functionality, a test is added for merging
type records. Future patches will add the ability to merge
symbol records, module information, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303389 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Right now we have multiple notions of things that represent collections of
types. Most commonly used are TypeDatabase, which is supposed to keep
mappings from TypeIndex to type name when reading a type stream, which
happens when reading PDBs. And also TypeTableBuilder, which is used to
build up a collection of types dynamically which we will later serialize
(i.e. when writing PDBs).
But often you just want to do some operation on a collection of types, and
you may want to do the same operation on any kind of collection. For
example, you might want to merge two TypeTableBuilders or you might want
to merge two type streams that you loaded from various files.
This dichotomy between reading and writing is responsible for a lot of the
existing code duplication and overlapping responsibilities in the existing
CodeView library classes. For example, after building up a
TypeTableBuilder with a bunch of type records, if we want to dump it we
have to re-invent a bunch of extra glue because our dumper takes a
TypeDatabase or a CVTypeArray, which are both incompatible with
TypeTableBuilder.
This patch introduces an abstract base class called TypeCollection which
is shared between the various type collection like things. Wherever we
previously stored a TypeDatabase& in some common class, we now store a
TypeCollection&.
The advantage of this is that all the details of how the collection are
implemented, such as lazy deserialization of partial type streams, is
completely transparent and you can just treat any collection of types the
same regardless of where it came from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33293
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303388 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303369 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This provides a new way to access the TargetMachine through
TargetPassConfig, as a dependency.
The patterns replaced here are:
* Passes handling a null TargetMachine call
`getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetPassConfig>`.
* Passes not handling a null TargetMachine
`addRequired<TargetPassConfig>` and call
`getAnalysis<TargetPassConfig>`.
* MachineFunctionPasses now use MF.getTarget().
* Remove all the TargetMachine constructors.
* Remove INITIALIZE_TM_PASS.
This fixes a crash when running `llc -start-before prologepilog`.
PEI needs StackProtector, which gets constructed without a TargetMachine
by the pass manager. The StackProtector pass doesn't handle the case
where there is no TargetMachine, so it segfaults.
Related to PR30324.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33222
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303360 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
As of this patch, 1018 out of 3938 rules are currently imported.
Depends on D32275
Reviewers: qcolombet, kristof.beyls, rovka, t.p.northover, ab, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32278
The previous commit failed on test-suite/Bitcode/simd_ops/AArch64_halide_runtime.bc
because isImmOperandEqual() assumed MO was a register operand and that's not
always true.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303341 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I revisited Decompressor API (issue with it was triggered during D32865 review)
and found it is probably provides more then we really need.
Issue was about next method's signature:
Error decompress(SmallString<32> &Out);
It is too strict. At first I wanted to change it to decompress(SmallVectorImpl<char> &Out),
but then found it is still not flexible because sticks to SmallVector.
During reviews was suggested to use templating to simplify code. Patch do that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33200
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303331 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
compatible target triple
Currently, an assertion fails in ThinLTOCodeGenerator::addModule when
the target triple of the module being added doesn't match that of the
one stored in TMBuilder. This patch relaxes the constraint and makes
changes to allow target triples that only differ in their version
numbers on Apple platforms, similarly to what r228999 did.
rdar://problem/30133904
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33291
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303326 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
There are several places in the codebase that try to calculate a maximum value in a Statistic object. We currently do this in one of two ways:
MaxNumFoo = std::max(MaxNumFoo, NumFoo);
or
MaxNumFoo = (MaxNumFoo > NumFoo) ? MaxNumFoo : NumFoo;
The first version reads from MaxNumFoo one time and uncontionally rwrites to it. The second version possibly reads it twice depending on the result of the first compare. But we have no way of knowing if the value was changed by another thread between the reads and the writes.
This patch adds a method to the Statistic object that can ensure that we only store if our value is the max and the previous max didn't change after we read it. If it changed we'll recheck if our value should still be the max or not and try again.
This spawned from an audit I'm trying to do of all places we uses the implicit conversion to unsigned on the Statistics objects. See my previous thread on llvm-dev https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/yfvxiorKrDQ
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, dblaikie
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33301
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303318 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Often you have an array and you just want to use it. With the current
design, you have to first construct a `BinaryByteStream`, and then create
a `BinaryStreamRef` from it. Worse, the `BinaryStreamRef` holds a pointer
to the `BinaryByteStream`, so you can't just create a temporary one to
appease the compiler, you have to actually hold onto both the `ArrayRef`
as well as the `BinaryByteStream` *AND* the `BinaryStreamReader` on top of
that. This makes for very cumbersome code, often requiring one to store a
`BinaryByteStream` in a class just to circumvent this.
At the cost of some added complexity (not exposed to users, but internal
to the library), we can do better than this. This patch allows us to
construct `BinaryStreamReaders` and `BinaryStreamWriters` directly from
source data (e.g. `StringRef`, `MutableArrayRef<uint8_t>`, etc). Not only
does this reduce the amount of code you have to type and make it more
obvious how to use it, but it solves real lifetime issues when it's
inconvenient to hold onto a `BinaryByteStream` for a long time.
The additional complexity is in the form of an added layer of indirection.
Whereas before we simply stored a `BinaryStream*` in the ref, we now store
both a `BinaryStream*` **and** a `std::shared_ptr<BinaryStream>`. When
the user wants to construct a `BinaryStreamRef` directly from an
`ArrayRef` etc, we allocate an internal object that holds ownership over a
`BinaryByteStream` and forwards all calls, and store this in the
`shared_ptr<>`. This also maintains the ref semantics, as you can copy it
by value and references refer to the same underlying stream -- the one
being held in the object stored in the `shared_ptr`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33293
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303294 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is often a lot of boilerplate code required to visit a type
record or type stream. The #1 use case is that you have a sequence
of bytes that represent one or more records, and you want to
deserialize each one, switch on it, and call a callback with the
deserialized record that the user can examine. Currently this
requires at least 6 lines of code:
codeview::TypeVisitorCallbackPipeline Pipeline;
Pipeline.addCallbackToPipeline(Deserializer);
Pipeline.addCallbackToPipeline(MyCallbacks);
codeview::CVTypeVisitor Visitor(Pipeline);
consumeError(Visitor.visitTypeRecord(Record));
With this patch, it becomes one line of code:
consumeError(codeview::visitTypeRecord(Record, MyCallbacks));
This is done by having the deserialization happen internally inside
of the visitTypeRecord function. Since this is occasionally not
desirable, the function provides a 3rd parameter that can be used
to change this behavior.
Hopefully this can significantly reduce the barrier to entry
to using the visitation infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33245
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303271 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A lot of code is duplicated between the first_last and the
next / prev methods. All of this code can be shared if they
are implemented in terms of find_first_in(Begin, End) etc,
in which case find_first = find_first_in(0, Size) and find_next
is find_first_in(Prev+1, Size), with similar reductions for
the other methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33104
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
