Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241775 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11017
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241655 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
SelectionDAG itself is not invoking directly the DataLayout in the
TargetMachine, but the "TargetLowering" class is still using it. I'll
address it in a following commit.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11000
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
It has been reverted previously because of some problems with comparing APInt with raw uint64_t. That has been fixed/changed with r241204.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@241254 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: This patch fixes the cases of sext/zext constant folding in DAG combiner where constans do not fit 64 bits. The fix simply removes un$
Test Plan: New regression test included.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10607
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We had a hack in SDAGBuilder in place to work around this but now we
can avoid that. Call BuildExactSDIV from BuildSDIV so DAGCombiner can
perform this trick automatically.
The added check in DAGCombiner is necessary to prevent exact sdiv by pow2
from regressing as the target-specific pow2 lowering is not aware of
exact bits yet.
This is mostly covered by existing tests. One side effect is that we
get the better lowering for exact vector sdivs now too :)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
Test Plan: A regression test included.
Reviewers: andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: andreadb, test, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10602
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240291 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will allow classes to implement the AA interface without deriving
from the class or referencing an internal enum of some other class as
their return types.
Also, to a pretty fundamental extent, concepts such as 'NoAlias',
'MayAlias', and 'MustAlias' are first class concepts in LLVM and we
aren't saving anything by scoping them heavily.
My mild preference would have been to use a scoped enum, but that
feature is essentially completely broken AFAICT. I'm extremely
disappointed. For example, we cannot through any reasonable[1] means
construct an enum class (or analog) which has scoped names but converts
to a boolean in order to test for the possibility of aliasing.
[1]: Richard Smith came up with a "solution", but it requires class
templates, and lots of boilerplate setting up the enumeration multiple
times. Something like Boost.PP could potentially bundle this up, but
even that would be quite painful and it doesn't seem realistically worth
it. The enum class solution would probably work without the need for
a bool conversion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10495
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240255 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@240137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that it is its own entity in the form of MemoryLocation, and update all
the callers.
This is an entirely mechanical change. References to "Location" within
AA subclases become "MemoryLocation", and elsewhere
"AliasAnalysis::Location" becomes "MemoryLocation". Hope that helps
out-of-tree folks update.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is an updated version of the patch that was checked in at:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046
but subsequently reverted because it exposed a bug in the DAG Combiner:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
This time, there's an enablement flag ("EnableFMFInDAG") around the code in
SelectionDAGBuilder where we copy the set of FP optimization flags from IR
instructions to DAG nodes. So, in theory, there should be no functional change
from this patch as-is, but it will allow testing with the added functionality
to proceed via "-enable-fmf-dag" passed to llc.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10403
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239828 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Reapply r239539. Don't assume the collected number of
stores is the same vector size. Just take the first N
stores to fill the vector.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239825 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Now actually stores the non-zero constant instead of 0.
I somehow forgot to include this part of r238108.
The test change was just an independent instruction order swap,
so just add another check line to satisfy CHECK-NEXT.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
For targets with a free fneg, this fold is always a net loss if it
ends up duplicating the multiply, so definitely avoid it.
This might be true for some targets without a free fneg too, but
I'll leave that for future investigation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239167 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also, moved test cases from CodeGen/X86/fold-buildvector-bug.ll into
CodeGen/X86/buildvec-insertvec.ll and regenerated CHECK lines using
update_llc_test_checks.py.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' in the DAGCombiner knows how to combine a
build_vector of a bunch of extract_vector_elt nodes and constant zero nodes
into a shuffle blend with a zero vector.
However, method 'visitBUILD_VECTOR' forgot that a floating point
build_vector may contain negative zero as well as positive zero.
Example:
define <2 x double> @example(<2 x double> %A) {
entry:
%0 = extractelement <2 x double> %A, i32 0
%1 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %0, i32 0
%2 = insertelement <2 x double> %1, double -0.0, i32 1
ret <2 x double> %2
}
Before this patch, llc (with -mattr=+sse4.1) wrongly generated
movq %xmm0, %xmm0 # xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero
So, the sign bit of the negative zero was effectively lost.
This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit checks for positive zero.
With this patch, llc produces the following code for the example above:
movhpd .LCPI0_0(%rip), %xmm0
where .LCPI0_0 referes to a 'double -0'.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@239070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
On GPU targets, materializing constants is cheap and stores are
expensive, so only doing this for zero vectors was silly.
Most of the new testcases aren't optimally merged, and are for
later improvements.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@238108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch improves support for sign extension of the lower lanes of vectors of integers by making use of the SSE41 pmovsx* sign extension instructions where possible, and optimizing the sign extension by shifts on pre-SSE41 targets (avoiding the use of i64 arithmetic shifts which require scalarization).
It converts SIGN_EXTEND nodes to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG where necessary, that more closely matches the pmovsx* instruction than the default approach of using SIGN_EXTEND_INREG which splits the operation (into an ANY_EXTEND lowered to a shuffle followed by shifts) making instruction matching difficult during lowering. Necessary support for SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG has been added to the DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9848
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237885 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
DAG.FoldConstantArithmetic() can fail even though both operands are
Constants if OpaqueConstants are involved. Continue trying other combine
possibilities in tis case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6946
Somewhat related to PR21801 / rdar://19211454
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237822 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1. remove duplicate local variable
2. add local variable with name to match comment
3. remove useless comment
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237715 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In CombineToPreIndexedLoadStore, when the offset is a constant, we have code
that looks for other uses of the pointer which are constant offset computations
so that they can be rewritten in terms of the updated pointer so that we don't
need to keep a copy of the base pointer to compute these constant offsets.
Unfortunately, when it iterated over the uses, it did so by SDNodes, and so we
could confuse ourselves if the base pointer was produced by a node that had
multiple results (because we would not immediately exclude uses of the other
node results). This was reported as PR22755. Unfortunately, we don't have a
test case (and I've also been unable to produce one thus far), but at least the
mistake is clear. The right way to fix this problem is to make use of the information
contained in the use iterators to filter out any uses of other results of the
node producing the base pointer.
This should be mostly NFC, but should also fix PR22755 (for which,
unfortunately, we have no in-tree test case).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237576 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a less ambitious version of:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236546
because that was reverted in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL236600
because it caused memory corruption that wasn't related to FMF
but was actually due to making nodes with 2 operands derive from a
plain SDNode rather than a BinarySDNode.
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The bug showed up as a compile-time assertion failure:
Assertion `NumBits >= MIN_INT_BITS && "bitwidth too small"' failed
when building msan tests on x86-64.
Prior to r236850, this bug was masked due to a bogus alignment check,
which also accidentally rejected non-byte-sized accesses. Afterwards,
an invalid ElementSizeBytes == 0 got further into the function, and
triggered the assertion failure.
It would probably be a good idea to allow it to handle merging stores
of unusual widths as well, but for now, to un-break it, I'm just
making the minimal fix.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9626
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
1) check whether the alignment of the memory is sufficient for the
*merged* store or load to be efficient.
Not doing so can result in some ridiculously poor code generation, if
merging creates a vector operation which must be aligned but isn't.
2) DON'T check that the alignment of each load/store is equal. If
you're merging 2 4-byte stores, the first *might* have 8-byte
alignment, but the second certainly will have 4-byte alignment. We do
want to allow those to be merged.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@236850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
