CostModel.
The original patch added support for horizontal min/max reductions to
the SLP vectorizer.
This patch causes LLVM to miscompile fairly simple signed min
reductions. I have attached a test progrom to http://llvm.org/PR34635
that shows the behavior change after this patch. We found this in a test
for the open source Eigen library, but also in other code.
Unfortunately, the revert is moderately challenging. It required
reverting:
r313042: [SLP] Test with multiple uses of conditional op and wrong parent.
r312853: [SLP] Fix buildbots, NFC.
r312793: [SLP] Fix the warning about paths not returning the value, NFC.
r312791: [SLP] Support for horizontal min/max reduction.
And even then, I had to completely skip reverting the changes to TTI and
CostModel because r312832 rewrote so much of this code. Plus, the cost
modeling changes aren implicated in the miscompile, so they should be
fine and will just not be used until this gets re-introduced.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch tries to improve vectorization of the following code:
void add1(int * __restrict dst, const int * __restrict src) {
*dst++ = *src++;
*dst++ = *src++ + 1;
*dst++ = *src++ + 2;
*dst++ = *src++ + 3;
}
Allows to vectorize even if the very first operation is not a binary add, but just a load.
Reviewers: spatel, mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab, ABataev, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28907
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@313348 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
SLP vectorizer supports horizontal reductions for Add/FAdd binary
operations. Patch adds support for horizontal min/max reductions.
Function getReductionCost() is split to getArithmeticReductionCost() for
binary operation reductions and getMinMaxReductionCost() for min/max
reductions.
Patch fixes PR26956.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27846
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@312791 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change let us schedule a bundle with different opcodes in it, for example : [ load, add, add, add ]
Reviewers: mkuper, RKSimon, ABataev, mzolotukhin, spatel, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36518
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Patch tries to improve two-pass vectorization analysis, existing in SLP vectorizer. What it does:
1. Defines key nodes, that are the vectorization roots. Previously vectorization started if StoreInst or ReturnInst is found. For now, the vectorization started for all Instructions with no users and void types (Terminators, StoreInst) + CallInsts.
2. CmpInsts, InsertElementInsts and InsertValueInsts are stored in the
array. This array is processed only after the vectorization of the
first-after-these instructions key node is finished. Vectorization goes
in reverse order to try to vectorize as much code as possible.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, Ayal, mkuper, gilr, hfinkel, RKSimon
Subscribers: ashahid, anemet, RKSimon, mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29826
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310260 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Patch tries to improve two-pass vectorization analysis, existing in SLP vectorizer. What it does:
1. Defines key nodes, that are the vectorization roots. Previously vectorization started if StoreInst or ReturnInst is found. For now, the vectorization started for all Instructions with no users and void types (Terminators, StoreInst) + CallInsts.
2. CmpInsts, InsertElementInsts and InsertValueInsts are stored in the array. This array is processed only after the vectorization of the first-after-these instructions key node is finished. Vectorization goes in reverse order to try to vectorize as much code as possible.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, Ayal, mkuper, gilr, hfinkel, RKSimon
Subscribers: ashahid, anemet, RKSimon, mssimpso, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29826
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@310255 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently most of the time vectors of extractelement instructions are
treated as scalars that must be gathered into vectors. But in some
cases, like when we have extractelement instructions from single vector
with different constant indeces or from 2 vectors of the same size, we
can treat this operations as shuffle of a single vector or blending of 2
vectors.
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%x0 = extractelement <2 x i8> %x, i32 0
%y1 = extractelement <2 x i8> %y, i32 1
%x0x0 = mul i8 %x0, %x0
%y1y1 = mul i8 %y1, %y1
%ins1 = insertelement <2 x i8> undef, i8 %x0x0, i32 0
%ins2 = insertelement <2 x i8> %ins1, i8 %y1y1, i32 1
ret <2 x i8> %ins2
}
```
can be converted to something like
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%1 = shufflevector <2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 3>
%2 = mul <2 x i8> %1, %1
ret <2 x i8> %2
}
```
Currently this type of conversion is considered as high cost
transformation.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, delena, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon
Subscribers: ashahid, RKSimon, spatel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30200
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309812 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
After some changes in SLP vectorizer we missed some additional checks to
limit the instructions for vectorization. We should not perform analysis
of the instructions if the parent of instruction is not the same as the
parent of the first instruction in the tree or it was analyzed already.
Subscribers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34881
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@309425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303362 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ARM Neon has native support for half-sized vector registers (64 bits). This
is beneficial for example for 2D and 3D graphics. This patch adds the option
to lower MinVecRegSize from 128 via a TTI in the SLP Vectorizer.
*** Performance Analysis
This change was motivated by some internal benchmarks but it is also
beneficial on SPEC and the LLVM testsuite.
The results are with -O3 and PGO. A negative percentage is an improvement.
The testsuite was run with a sample size of 4.
** SPEC
* CFP2006/482.sphinx3 -3.34%
A pretty hot loop is SLP vectorized resulting in nice instruction reduction.
This used to be a +22% regression before rL299482.
* CFP2000/177.mesa -3.34%
* CINT2000/256.bzip2 +6.97%
My current plan is to extend the fix in rL299482 to i16 which brings the
regression down to +2.5%. There are also other problems with the codegen in
this loop so there is further room for improvement.
** LLVM testsuite
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon -10.75%
There are multiple small SLP vectorizations outside the hot code. It's a bit
surprising that it adds up to 10%. Some of this may be code-layout noise.
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -8.40%
The opt-viewer screenshot can be seen at F3218284. We start at a colder store
but the tree leads us into the hottest loop.
* MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0.1.3/lambda -2.68%
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet -2.18%
This is using 3D vectors.
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/Shootout-C++-lists +6.67%
Noise, binary is unchanged.
* MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram +4.90%
There is an additional SLP in the cold code. The test runs for ~1sec and
prints out over 2000 lines. This is most likely noise.
* MultiSource/Applications/aha/aha +1.63%
* MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod +1.41%
* SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/richards_benchmark +1.15%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31965
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303116 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The approach I followed was to emit the remark after getTreeCost concludes
that SLP is profitable. I initially tried emitting them after the
vectorizeRootInstruction calls in vectorizeChainsInBlock but I vaguely
remember missing a few cases for example in HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce.
ORE is placed in BoUpSLP so that it's available from everywhere (notably
HorizontalReduction::tryToReduce).
We use the first instruction in the root bundle as the locator for the remark.
In order to get a sense how far the tree is spanning I've include the size of
the tree in the remark. This is not perfect of course but it gives you at
least a rough idea about the tree. Then you can follow up with -view-slp-tree
to really see the actual tree.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@302811 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
