llvm/lib/Analysis
Artur Pilipenko a267310794 Revert -r278267 [ValueTracking] An improvement to IR ValueTracking on Non-negative Integers
This change cause performance regression on MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt from LNT and some other bechmarks.

See https://reviews.llvm.org/D18777 for details.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@279433 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2016-08-22 13:14:07 +00:00
..
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2016-07-28 23:31:12 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2016-07-07 16:19:09 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//