llvm/lib/Analysis
Sanjay Patel 557e920ce8 [InstSimplify] fold and/or of fcmp ord/uno when operand is known nnan
The 'ord' and 'uno' predicates have a logic operation for NAN built into their definitions:

FCMP_ORD   =  7,  ///< 0 1 1 1    True if ordered (no nans)
FCMP_UNO   =  8,  ///< 1 0 0 0    True if unordered: isnan(X) | isnan(Y)

So we can simplify patterns like this:

(fcmp ord (known NNAN), X) && (fcmp ord X, Y) --> fcmp ord X, Y
(fcmp uno (known NNAN), X) || (fcmp uno X, Y) --> fcmp uno X, Y

It might be better to split this into (X uno 0) | (Y uno 0) as a canonicalization, but that
would be another patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40130 


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@318627 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2017-11-19 15:34:27 +00:00
..
2016-08-25 01:29:55 +00:00
2017-07-09 05:54:44 +00:00
2017-10-01 00:09:53 +00:00
2016-04-18 09:17:29 +00:00
2017-02-14 17:21:12 +00:00
2017-08-25 12:38:53 +00:00
2017-11-16 13:49:27 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//