Files
llvm/lib/Analysis
Jessica Paquette 87d50cfb8f [NFC] Optionally pass a function to emitInstrCountChangedRemark
In basic block, loop, and function passes, we already have a function that
we can use to emit optimization remarks. We can use that instead of searching
the module for the first suitable function (that is, one that contains at
least one basic block.)

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341253 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2018-08-31 20:54:37 +00:00
..
2016-08-25 01:29:55 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-08-05 14:53:08 +00:00
2018-05-14 12:53:11 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00
2018-08-30 18:37:18 +00:00
2018-08-29 23:20:29 +00:00
2018-07-22 20:04:42 +00:00
2018-07-30 19:41:25 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//