MachineInstructions that don't generate any code (such as
IMPLICIT_DEFs) should not generate any debug info either.
Fixes PR33107.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33107
This reapplies r303566 without any modifications. The stage2 build
failures persisted even after reverting this patch, and looking back
through history, it looks like these tests are flaky.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303575 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
With instrumentation profiling, when updating the VP metadata after
an inline, VP metadata on the inlined copy was inadvertantly having
all counts zeroed out. This was causing indirect calls from code inlined
during the call step to be marked as cold in the ThinLTO summaries and
not imported.
The CallerBFI needs to be passed down so that the CallSiteCount can be
computed from the profile summary info. With Sample PGO this was working
since the count is extracted from the branch weight metadata on the
call being inlined (even before we stopped looking at metadata for
non-sample PGO in r302844 this largely wasn't working for instrumentation
PGO since only promoted indirect calls would be getting inlined and have
the metadata).
Added an instrumentation PGO test and renamed the sample PGO test.
Reviewers: danielcdh, eraman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33389
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303574 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's causing some buildbots to timeout whenever tablegen needs re-compilation,
particularly those with -fsanitize=memory but not only them. A compile time
regression was expected since it triples the amount of SelectionDAG rules we
are able to import but it's currently too high.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Re-applying now that PR32825 which was raised on the commit this fixed up is now known to have also been fixed by this commit.
Original commit message:
Multiple ldr pseudoinstructions with the same constant value will
reuse the same constant pool entry. However, if the constant pool
is explicitly flushed with a .ltorg directive, we should not try
to reference constants in the previous pool any longer, since they
may be out of range.
This fixes assembling hand-written assembler source which repeatedly
loads the same constant value, across a binary size larger than the
pc-relative fixup range for ldr instructions (4096 bytes). Such
assembler source already uses explicit .ltorg instructions to emit
constant pools with regular intervals. However if we try to reuse
constants emitted in earlier pools, they end up out of range.
This makes the output of the testcase match what binutils gas does
(prior to this patch, it would fail to assemble).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32847
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303540 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Re-applying now that the open bug on this commit, PR32825, is known to be fixed.
Original commit message:
Summary: This patch returns the same label if the CP entry with the same value has been created.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rengolin, jmolloy
Subscribers: majnemer, jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25804
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r302416. This was a fixup for r286006, which has now been reverted so this doesn't apply (either in concept or in code).
This commit itself has no problems, but the underlying issue it was fixing has now disappeared from the codebase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llvm-symbolizer would fail to symbolize addresses in unlinked object
files when handling .dwo file data because the addresses would not be
relocated in the same way as the ranges in the skeleton CU in the object
file.
Fix that so object files can be symbolized the same as executables.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303532 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a re-application of a r303497 that was reverted in r303498.
I thought it had broken a bot when it had not (the breakage did not
go away with the revert).
This change makes the split between the "exact" backedge taken count
and the "maximum" backedge taken count a bit more obvious. Both of
these are upper bounds on the number of times the loop header
executes (since SCEV does not account for most kinds of abnormal
control flow), but the latter is guaranteed to be a constant.
There were a few places where the max backedge taken count *was* a
non-constant; I've changed those to compute constants instead.
At this point, I'm not sure if the constant max backedge count can be
computed by calling `getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax()` without
losing precision. If it can, we can simplify even further by making
`getMaxBackedgeTakenCount` a thin wrapper around
`getBackedgeTakenCount` and `getUnsignedRange`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303531 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Taken from PR32845. Dan removed the most dominating leader check
in r303443, but we check this test anyway to make sure things
don't regress.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303515 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Otherwise we end up miscompiling, transforming:
define i8 @tinky() {
%sext = sext i1 1 to i16
%hibit = lshr i16 %sext, 15
%tr = trunc i16 %hibit to i8
ret i8 %tr
}
into:
%sext = sext i1 1 to i8
ret i8 %sext
and the first get folded to ret i8 1, while the second gets folded
to ret i8 -1.
Eventually we should get rid of this transform entirely, but for now,
this at least fixes a know correctness bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33338
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303513 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Updated tests with -verify-machineinstrs flag.
It fixes 3 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303502 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
PPC backend eliminates compare instructions by using record-form instructions in PPCInstrInfo::optimizeCompareInstr, which is called from peephole optimization pass.
This patch improves this optimization to eliminate more compare instructions in two types of common case.
- comparison against a constant 1 or -1
The record-form instructions set CR bit based on signed comparison against 0. So, the current implementation does not exploit the record-form instruction for comparison against a non-zero constant.
This patch enables record-form optimization for constant of 1 or -1 if possible; it changes the condition "greater than -1" into "greater than or equal to 0" and "less than 1" into "less than or equal to 0".
With this patch, compare can be eliminated in the following code sequence, as an example.
uint64_t a, b;
if ((a | b) & 0x8000000000000000ull) { ... }
else { ... }
- andi for 32-bit comparison on PPC64
Since record-form instructions execute 64-bit signed comparison and so we have limitation in eliminating 32-bit comparison, i.e. with cmplwi, using the record-form. The original implementation already has such checks but andi. is not recognized as an instruction which executes implicit zero extension and hence safe to convert into record-form if used for equality check.
%1 = and i32 %a, 10
%2 = icmp ne i32 %1, 0
br i1 %2, label %foo, label %bar
In this simple example, LLVM generates andi. + cmplwi + beq on PPC64.
This patch make it possible to eliminate the cmplwi for this case.
I added andi. for optimization targets if it is safe to do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30081
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303500 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change makes the split between the "exact" backedge taken count
and the "maximum" backedge taken count a bit more obvious. Both of
these are upper bounds on the number of times the loop header
executes (since SCEV does not account for most kinds of abnormal
control flow), but the latter is guaranteed to be a constant.
There were a few places where the max backedge taken count *was* a
non-constant; I've changed those to compute constants instead.
At this point, I'm not sure if the constant max backedge count can be
computed by calling `getUnsignedRange(Exact).getUnsignedMax()` without
losing precision. If it can, we can simplify even further by making
`getMaxBackedgeTakenCount` a thin wrapper around
`getBackedgeTakenCount` and `getUnsignedRange`.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303497 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixed "most platform" to read "most platforms", and changed "are not
using the same" to "use different" as a drive-by.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@303487 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
