This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The functionality contained within getIntrinsicIDForCall is two-fold: it
checks if a CallInst's callee is a vectorizable intrinsic. If it isn't
an intrinsic, it attempts to map the call's target to a suitable
intrinsic.
Move the mapping functionality into getIntrinsicForCallSite and rename
getIntrinsicIDForCall to getVectorIntrinsicIDForCall while
reimplementing it in terms of getIntrinsicForCallSite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The behavior of {MIN,MAX}NAN differs from that of {MIN,MAX}NUM when only
one of the inputs is NaN: -NUM will return the non-NaN argument while
-NAN would return NaN.
It is desirable to lower to @llvm.{min,max}num to -NAN if they don't
have a native instruction for -NUM. Notably, ARMv7 NEON's vmin has the
-NAN semantics.
N.B. Of course, it is only safe to do this if the intrinsic call is
marked nnan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266279 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A catchswitch cannot be preceded by another instruction in the same
basic block (other than a PHI node).
Instead, insert the extract element right after the materialization of
the vectorized value. This isn't optimal but is a reasonable compromise
given the constraints of WinEH.
This fixes PR27163.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265157 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reapplies r263258, which was reverted in r263321 because
of issues on Clang side.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263393 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Commit r259357 was reverted because it caused PR26629. We were assuming all
roots of a vectorizable tree could be truncated to the same width, which is not
the case in general. This commit reapplies the patch along with a fix and a new
test case to ensure we don't regress because of this issue again. This should
fix PR26629.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@261212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The previous patch caused PR26364. The fix is to ensure that we don't enter a
cycle when iterating over use-def chains.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@259357 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch is the second attempt to reapply commit r258404. There was bug in
the initial patch and subsequent fix (mentioned below).
The initial patch caused an assertion because we were computing smaller type
sizes for instructions that cannot be demoted. The fix first determines the
instructions that will be demoted, and then applies the smaller type size to
only those instructions.
This should fix PR26239 and PR26307.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258929 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is a recommit of r258620 which causes PR26293.
The original message:
Now LIR can turn following codes into memset:
typedef struct foo {
int a;
int b;
} foo_t;
void bar(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
f[i].a = 0;
f[i].b = 0;
}
}
void test(foo_t *f, unsigned n) {
for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i += 2) {
f[i] = 0;
f[i+1] = 0;
}
}
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were hitting an assertion because we were computing smaller type sizes for
instructions that cannot be demoted. The fix first determines the instructions
that will be demoted, and then applies the smaller type size to only those
instructions.
This should fix PR26239.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258705 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change attempts to produce vectorized integer expressions in bit widths
that are narrower than their scalar counterparts. The need for demotion arises
especially on architectures in which the small integer types (e.g., i8 and i16)
are not legal for scalar operations but can still be used in vectors. Like
similar work done within the loop vectorizer, we rely on InstCombine to perform
the actual type-shrinking. We use the DemandedBits analysis and
ComputeNumSignBits from ValueTracking to determine the minimum required bit
width of an expression.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15815
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@258404 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The fix uniques the bundle of getelementptr indices we are about to vectorize
since it's possible for the same index to be used by multiple instructions.
The original commit message is below.
[SLP] Vectorize the index computations of getelementptr instructions.
This patch seeds the SLP vectorizer with getelementptr indices. The primary
motivation in doing so is to vectorize gather-like idioms beginning with
consecutive loads (e.g., g[a[0] - b[0]] + g[a[1] - b[1]] + ...). While these
cases could be vectorized with a top-down phase, seeding the existing bottom-up
phase with the index computations avoids the complexity, compile-time, and
phase ordering issues associated with a full top-down pass. Only bundles of
single-index getelementptrs with non-constant differences are considered for
vectorization.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@257918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch seeds the SLP vectorizer with getelementptr indices. The primary
motivation in doing so is to vectorize gather-like idioms beginning with
consecutive loads (e.g., g[a[0] - b[0]] + g[a[1] - b[1]] + ...). While these
cases could be vectorized with a top-down phase, seeding the existing bottom-up
phase with the index computations avoids the complexity, compile-time, and
phase ordering issues associated with a full top-down pass. Only bundles of
single-index getelementptrs with non-constant differences are considered for
vectorization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14829
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@257800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When considering incoming values as part of a reduction phi, ensure the
incoming value is dominated by said phi.
Failing to ensure this property causes miscompiles.
Fixes PR25787.
Many thanks to Mattias Eriksson for reporting, reducing and analyzing the
problem for me.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15580
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@255792 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Measurements primarily on AArch64 have shown this feature does not
significantly effect compile-time. The are no significant perf changes in LNT,
but for AArch64 at least, there are wins in third party benchmarks.
As discussed on llvm-dev, we're going to try turning this on by default and see
how other targets react to the change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The SLPVectorizer had a very crude way of trying to benefit
from associativity: it tried to optimize for splat/broadcast
or in order to have the same operator on the same side.
This is benefitial to the cost model and allows more vectorization
to occur.
This patch improve the logic and make the detection optimal (locally,
we don't look at the full tree but only at the immediate children).
Should fix https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25247
Reviewers: mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13996
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@252337 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This change could be way off-piste, I'm looking for any feedback on whether it's an acceptable approach.
It never seems to be a problem to gobble up as many reduction values as can be found, and then to attempt to reduce the resulting tree. Some of the workloads I'm looking at have been aggressively unrolled by hand, and by selecting reduction widths that are not constrained by a vector register size, it becomes possible to profitably vectorize. My test case shows such an unrolling which SLP was not vectorizing (on neither ARM nor X86) before this patch, but with it does vectorize.
I measure no significant compile time impact of this change when combined with D13949 and D14063. There are also no significant performance regressions on ARM/AArch64 in SPEC or LNT.
The more principled approach I thought of was to generate several candidate tree's and use the cost model to pick the cheapest one. That seemed like quite a big design change (the algorithms seem very much one-shot), and would likely be a costly thing for compile time. This seemed to do the job at very little cost, but I'm worried I've misunderstood something!
Reviewers: nadav, jmolloy
Subscribers: mssimpso, llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14116
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently, when the SLP vectorizer considers whether a phi is part of a reduction, it dismisses phi's whose incoming blocks are not the same as the block containing the phi. For the patterns I'm looking at, extending this rule to allow phis whose incoming block is a containing loop latch allows me to vectorize certain workloads.
There is no significant compile-time impact, and combined with D13949, no performance improvement measured in ARM/AArch64 in any of SPEC2000, SPEC2006 or LNT.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mcrosier, nadav
Subscribers: mssimpso, nadav, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14063
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251425 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Certain workloads, in particular sum-of-absdiff loops, can be vectorized using SLP if it can treat select instructions as reduction values.
The test case is a bit awkward. The AArch64 cost model needs some tuning to not be so pessimistic about selects. I've had to tweak the SLP threshold here.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mzolotukhin, spatel, nadav
Subscribers: nadav, mssimpso, aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13949
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is intended to simplify the changes needed to solve PR25247.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@251085 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Besides the usual, I finally added an overload to
`BasicBlock::splitBasicBlock()` that accepts an `Instruction*` instead
of `BasicBlock::iterator`. Someone can go back and remove this overload
later (after updating the callers I'm going to skip going forward), but
the most common call seems to be
`BB->splitBasicBlock(BB->getTerminator(), ...)` and I'm not sure it's
better to add `->getIterator()` to every one than have the overload.
It's pretty hard to get the usage wrong.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@250745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Given an array of i2 elements, 4 consecutive scalar loads will be lowered to
i8-sized loads and thus will access 4 consecutive bytes in memory. If we
vectorize these loads into a single <4 x i2> load, it'll access only 1 byte in
memory. Hence, we should prohibit vectorization in such cases.
PS: Initial patch was proposed by Arnold.
Reviewers: aschwaighofer, nadav, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13277
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@248943 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
