My commit rL216160 introduced a bug PR21014: IndVars widens code 'for (i = ; i < ...; i++) arr[ CONST - i]' into 'for (i = ; i < ...; i++) arr[ i - CONST]'
thus inverting index expression. This patch fixes it.
Thanks to Jörg Sonnenberger for pointing.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5576
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218867 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This file isn't really doing anything useful. Many of the tests that
seem to be combined are also repeats from other test files. Many of the
other tests, despite the comment that they should be combined into
a single shuffle... well... aren't combined into a single shuffle.
=/
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218862 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
least seem *slightly* more interesting test wise, although given how
spotily we actually combine anything, I remain somewhat suspicious.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218861 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
checks for all the ISA variants.
If the SSE2 checks here terrify you, good. This is (in large part) the
kind of amazingly bad code that is holding LLVM back when vectorizing on
older ISAs.
At the same time, these tests seem increasingly dubious to me. There are
a very large number of tests and it isn't clear that they are
systematically covering a specific set of functionality. Anyways,
I don't want to reduce testing during the transition, I just want to
consolidate it to where it is easier to manage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218860 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
file.
Some of these really don't make sense to test -- we're testing for the
*lack* of combining two shuffles into one, presumably because the two
would generate better shuffles in the end. But if you look at the
generated code shown here, in many cases the generated code is, frankly,
terrible. Or we combine any two generated shuffles back into a single
instruction! I've left a FIXME to revisit these decisions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218859 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
and use the new grouped FileCheck patterns to match them.
No interesting changes yet, but this test is now in proper form to have
the other shuffle combining tests merged into it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218857 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test has to do with DAG combines, and so it doesn't need the new
vector shuffle lowering to be effective. Also, it has a nice in-IR
triple string which we should really be using rather than command line
flags (unless it varies form RUN-line to RUN-line). Finally, I much
prefer letting LLVM synthesize the correct datalayout string from the
triple rather than baking one in here that will just become stale.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218856 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
generic DAG combining of shuffles relevant to x86.
My plan is to fold a bunch of the other DAG combining test cases into
this one, while converting them to use the nice new FileCheck assertion
syntax.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218855 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a bare-metal triple and have nice BB labels, etc.
No significant change here, just tidying up to have a consistent set of
OS-agnostic vector functionality here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218854 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
matching and lowering 64-bit insertions.
The first problem was that we weren't looking through bitcasts to
discover that we *could* lower as insertions. Once fixed, we in turn
weren't looking through bitcasts to discover that we could fold a load
into the lowering. Once fixed, we weren't forming a SCALAR_TO_VECTOR
node around the inserted element and instead were passing a scalar to
a DAG node that expected a vector. It turns out there are some patterns
that will "lower" this into the correct asm, but the rest of the X86
backend is very unhappy with such antics.
This should fix a few more edge case regressions I've spotted going
through the regression test suite to enable the new vector shuffle
lowering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218839 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
test file.
This old test had a bunch of functions that were never even checked. =/
The only thing it really did was to make sure that we did something
reasonable in 32-bit mode with SSE4.1. Adding another run line to the
main vector-sext.ll test seems a better way to do that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218810 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
of architectures: SSE2, SSSE3, SSE4.1, AVX, and AVX2.
Unfortunately, this exposses the absolute horror of the code we generate
for many of these patterns. Anyone wanting to familiarize themselves
with the x86 backend and improve performance could do a lot of good
sitting down and making these test cases not look so terrible. While the
new vector shuffle code I'm working on well help some, it won't fix all
of the crimes here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218807 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As discussed here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140609/220598.html
And again here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/077168.html
The sqrt of a negative number when using the llvm intrinsic is undefined.
We should return undef rather than 0.0 to match the definition in the LLVM IR lang ref.
This change should not affect any code that isn't using "no-nans-fp-math";
ie, no-nans is a requirement for generating the llvm intrinsic in place of a sqrt function call.
Unfortunately, the behavior introduced by this patch will not match current gcc, xlc, icc, and
possibly other compilers. The current clang/llvm behavior of returning 0.0 doesn't either.
We knowingly approve of this difference with the other compilers in an attempt to flag code
that is invoking undefined behavior.
A front-end warning should also try to convince the user that the program will fail:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21093
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5527
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218803 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These tests are far and away the best sext and zext tests we have for
vectors. I'm going to merge the other similar tests into them and expand
the ISA coverage.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
script to make them nice and predictable. This will ease updating them
for the new vector shuffle lowering and seeing the delta if any.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
avx-sext.ll using my new script.
Also add an AVX2 mode to this test.
Part of cleaning up the test suite before enabling the new vector
shuffle lowering. This also highlights some of the abysmal failures of
the old shuffle lowering. Check out those 'pinsrw' and 'pextrw'
sequences!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218794 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As with x86 and AArch64, certain situations can arise where we need to spill
CPSR in the middle of a calculation. These should be avoided where possible
(MRS/MSR is rather expensive), which ARM is actually better at than the other
two since it tries to Glue defs to uses, but as a last ditch effort, copying is
better than crashing.
rdar://problem/18011155
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218789 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218787 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: Implement conversion of 64 to 32 bit floating point numbers (fptrunc) in mips fast-isel
Test Plan:
fptrunc.ll
checked also with 4 internal mips build bot flavors mip32r1/miprs32r2 and at -O0 and -O2
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: rfuhler
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5553
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r206400 and r209442 added remarks that are disabled by default.
However, if a diagnostic handler is registered, the remarks are sent
unfiltered to the handler. This is the right behaviour for clang, since
it has its own filters.
However, the diagnostic handler exposed in the LTO API receives only the
severity and message. It doesn't have the information to filter by pass
name. For LTO, disabled remarks should be filtered by the producer.
I've changed `LLVMContext::setDiagnosticHandler()` to take a `bool`
argument indicating whether to respect the built-in filters. This
defaults to `false`, so other consumers don't have a behaviour change,
but `LTOCodeGenerator::setDiagnosticHandler()` sets it to `true`.
To make this behaviour testable, I added a `-use-diagnostic-handler`
command-line option to `llvm-lto`.
This fixes PR21108.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently, we only codegen the VRINT[APMXZR] and VCVT[BT] instructions
when targeting ARMv8, but they are actually present on any target with
FP-ARMv8. Note that FP-ARMv8 is called FPv5 when is is part of an
M-profile core, but they have the same instructions so we model them
both as FPARMv8 in the ARM backend.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that keep cropping up in the regression test suite.
This also addresses one of the issues raised on the mailing list with
failing to form 'movsd' in as many cases as we realistically should.
There will be corresponding patches forthcoming for v4f32 at least. This
was a lot of fuss for a relatively small gain, but all the fuss was on
my end trying different ways of holding the pieces of the x86 fragment
patterns *just right*. Now that it works, the code is reasonably simple.
In the new test cases I'm adding here, v2i64 sticks out as just plain
horrible. I've not come up with any great ideas here other than that it
would be nice to recognize when we're *going* to take a domain crossing
hit and cross earlier to get the decent instructions. At least with AVX
it is slightly less silly....
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218756 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The A64 instruction set includes a generic register syntax for accessing
implementation-defined system registers. The syntax for these registers is:
S<op0>_<op1>_<CRn>_<CRm>_<op2>
The encoding space permitted for implementation-defined system registers
is:
op0 op1 CRn CRm op2
11 xxx 1x11 xxxx xxx
The full encoding space can now be accessed:
op0 op1 CRn CRm op2
xx xxx xxxx xxxx xxx
This is useful to anyone needing to write assembly code supporting new
system registers before the assembler has learned the official names for
them.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary: The natual vector cast node (similar to bitcast) AArch64ISD::NVCAST
was introduced in r217159 and r217138. This patch adds a missing cast from
v2f32 to v1i64 which is causing some compilation failures. Also added test
cases to cover various modimm types and BUILD_VECTORs with i64 elements.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The Cortex-M7 has 3 options for its FPU: none, FPv5-SP-D16 and
FPv5-DP-D16. FPv5 has the same instructions as FP-ARMv8, so it can be
modelled using the same target feature, and all double-precision
operations are already disabled by the fp-only-sp target features.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r218702 disabled a -gmlt optimization for darwin, but this means the
non-darwin test isn't working there anymore.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
in exposing the scalar value to the broadcast DAG fragment so that we
can catch even reloads and fold them into the broadcast.
This is somewhat magical I'm afraid but seems to work. It is also what
the old lowering did, and I've switched an old test to run both
lowerings demonstrating that we get the same result.
Unlike the old code, I'm not lowering f32 or f64 scalars through this
path when we only have AVX1. The target patterns include pretty heinous
code to re-cast those as shuffles when the scalar happens to not be
spilled because AVX1 provides no broadcast mechanism from registers
what-so-ever. This is terribly brittle. I'd much rather go through our
generic lowering code to get this. If needed, we can add a peephole to
get even more opportunities to broadcast-from-spill-slots that are
exposed post-RA, but my suspicion is this just doesn't matter that much.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the same speed as pshufd but we can fold loads into the pmovzx
instructions.
This fixes some regressions that came up in the regression test suite
for the new vector shuffle lowering.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218733 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows proper disambiguation of unbounded arrays and arrays of zero
bound ("struct foo { int x[]; };" and "struct foo { int x[0]; }"). GCC
instead produces an upper bound of -1 in the latter situation, but count
seems tidier. This way lower_bound is provided if it's not the language
default and count is provided if the count is known, otherwise it's
omitted. Simple.
If someone wants to look at rdar://problem/12566646 and see if this
change is acceptable to that bug/fix, that might be helpful (see the
empty-and-one-elem-array.ll test case which cites that radar).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218726 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
VPBROADCAST.
This has the somewhat expected pervasive impact. I don't know why
I forgot about this. Everything seems good with lots of significant
improvements in the tests.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@218724 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
