The KORTEST was introduced due to a bug where a TEST instruction used a K register.
but, turns out that the opposite case of KORTEST using a GPR is now happening
The change removes the KORTEST flow and adds a COPY instruction from the K reg to a GPR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24953
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This check currently doesn't seem to do anything useful on any in-tree target:
On non-x86, it always evaluates to false, so we never hit the code path that
creates the shuffle with zero.
On x86, it just forwards to isShuffleMaskLegal(), which is a reasonable thing to
query in general, but doesn't make sense if only restricted to zero blends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24625
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282567 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
other load commands that use the MachO::dylinker_command type
but not used in llvm libObject code but used in llvm tool code.
This includes LC_ID_DYLINKER, LC_LOAD_DYLINKER
and LC_DYLD_ENVIRONMENT load commands.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282553 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The 'or' case shows up in copysign. The copysign code also had
redundant checking for a scalar zero operand with 'and', so I
removed that.
I'm not sure how to test vector 'and', 'andn', and 'xor' yet,
but it seems better to just include all of the logic ops since
we're fixing 'or' anyway.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282546 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The current implementation of isConstantPhysReg() checks for defs of
physical registers to determine if they are constant. Some
architectures (e.g. AArch64 XZR/WZR) have registers that are constant
and may be used as destinations to indicate the generated value is
discarded, preventing isConstantPhysReg() from returning true. This
change adds a TargetRegisterInfo hook that overrides the no defs check
for cases such as this.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet, t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: junbuml, aemerson, mcrosier, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24570
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There is really no reason for these to be separate.
The vectorizer started this pretty bad tradition that the text of the
missed remarks is pretty meaningless, i.e. vectorization failed. There,
you have to query analysis to get the full picture.
I think we should just explain the reason for missing the optimization
in the missed remark when possible. Analysis remarks should provide
information that the pass gathers regardless whether the optimization is
passing or not.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(Re-committed after moving the template specialization under the yaml
namespace. GCC was complaining about this.)
This allows various presentation of this data using an external tool.
This was first recommended here[1].
As an example, consider this module:
1 int foo();
2 int bar();
3
4 int baz() {
5 return foo() + bar();
6 }
The inliner generates these missed-optimization remarks today (the
hotness information is pulled from PGO):
remark: /tmp/s.c:5:10: foo will not be inlined into baz (hotness: 30)
remark: /tmp/s.c:5:18: bar will not be inlined into baz (hotness: 30)
Now with -pass-remarks-output=<yaml-file>, we generate this YAML file:
--- !Missed
Pass: inline
Name: NotInlined
DebugLoc: { File: /tmp/s.c, Line: 5, Column: 10 }
Function: baz
Hotness: 30
Args:
- Callee: foo
- String: will not be inlined into
- Caller: baz
...
--- !Missed
Pass: inline
Name: NotInlined
DebugLoc: { File: /tmp/s.c, Line: 5, Column: 18 }
Function: baz
Hotness: 30
Args:
- Callee: bar
- String: will not be inlined into
- Caller: baz
...
This is a summary of the high-level decisions:
* There is a new streaming interface to emit optimization remarks.
E.g. for the inliner remark above:
ORE.emit(DiagnosticInfoOptimizationRemarkMissed(
DEBUG_TYPE, "NotInlined", &I)
<< NV("Callee", Callee) << " will not be inlined into "
<< NV("Caller", CS.getCaller()) << setIsVerbose());
NV stands for named value and allows the YAML client to process a remark
using its name (NotInlined) and the named arguments (Callee and Caller)
without parsing the text of the message.
Subsequent patches will update ORE users to use the new streaming API.
* I am using YAML I/O for writing the YAML file. YAML I/O requires you
to specify reading and writing at once but reading is highly non-trivial
for some of the more complex LLVM types. Since it's not clear that we
(ever) want to use LLVM to parse this YAML file, the code supports and
asserts that we're writing only.
On the other hand, I did experiment that the class hierarchy starting at
DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase can be mapped back from YAML generated
here (see D24479).
* The YAML stream is stored in the LLVM context.
* In the example, we can probably further specify the IR value used,
i.e. print "Function" rather than "Value".
* As before hotness is computed in the analysis pass instead of
DiganosticInfo. This avoids the layering problem since BFI is in
Analysis while DiagnosticInfo is in IR.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D19678#419445
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24587
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282539 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Variables are sometimes missing their debug location information in
blocks in which the variables should be available. This would occur
when one or more predecessor blocks had not yet been visited by the
routine which propagated the information from predecessor blocks.
This is addressed by only considering predecessor blocks which have
already been visited.
The solution to this problem was suggested by Daniel Berlin on the
LLVM developer mailing list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24927
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282506 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows various presentation of this data using an external tool.
This was first recommended here[1].
As an example, consider this module:
1 int foo();
2 int bar();
3
4 int baz() {
5 return foo() + bar();
6 }
The inliner generates these missed-optimization remarks today (the
hotness information is pulled from PGO):
remark: /tmp/s.c:5:10: foo will not be inlined into baz (hotness: 30)
remark: /tmp/s.c:5:18: bar will not be inlined into baz (hotness: 30)
Now with -pass-remarks-output=<yaml-file>, we generate this YAML file:
--- !Missed
Pass: inline
Name: NotInlined
DebugLoc: { File: /tmp/s.c, Line: 5, Column: 10 }
Function: baz
Hotness: 30
Args:
- Callee: foo
- String: will not be inlined into
- Caller: baz
...
--- !Missed
Pass: inline
Name: NotInlined
DebugLoc: { File: /tmp/s.c, Line: 5, Column: 18 }
Function: baz
Hotness: 30
Args:
- Callee: bar
- String: will not be inlined into
- Caller: baz
...
This is a summary of the high-level decisions:
* There is a new streaming interface to emit optimization remarks.
E.g. for the inliner remark above:
ORE.emit(DiagnosticInfoOptimizationRemarkMissed(
DEBUG_TYPE, "NotInlined", &I)
<< NV("Callee", Callee) << " will not be inlined into "
<< NV("Caller", CS.getCaller()) << setIsVerbose());
NV stands for named value and allows the YAML client to process a remark
using its name (NotInlined) and the named arguments (Callee and Caller)
without parsing the text of the message.
Subsequent patches will update ORE users to use the new streaming API.
* I am using YAML I/O for writing the YAML file. YAML I/O requires you
to specify reading and writing at once but reading is highly non-trivial
for some of the more complex LLVM types. Since it's not clear that we
(ever) want to use LLVM to parse this YAML file, the code supports and
asserts that we're writing only.
On the other hand, I did experiment that the class hierarchy starting at
DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase can be mapped back from YAML generated
here (see D24479).
* The YAML stream is stored in the LLVM context.
* In the example, we can probably further specify the IR value used,
i.e. print "Function" rather than "Value".
* As before hotness is computed in the analysis pass instead of
DiganosticInfo. This avoids the layering problem since BFI is in
Analysis while DiagnosticInfo is in IR.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D19678#419445
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24587
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch corresponds to review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24396
This patch adds support for the "vector count trailing zeroes",
"vector compare not equal" and "vector compare not equal or zero instructions"
as well as "scalar count trailing zeroes" instructions. It also changes the
vector negation to use XXLNOR (when VSX is enabled) so as not to increase
register pressure (previously this was done with a splat immediate of all
ones followed by an XXLXOR). This was done because the altivec.h
builtins (patch to follow) use vector negation and the use of an additional
register for the splat immediate is not optimal.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282478 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
We don't currently need this facility for CFI. Disabling individual hot methods proved
to be a better strategy in Chrome.
Also, the design of the feature is suboptimal, as pointed out by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24948
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282461 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
other load commands that use the Mach::linkedit_data_command type
but not used in llvm libObject code but used in llvm tool code.
This includes LC_FUNCTION_STARTS, LC_SEGMENT_SPLIT_INFO
and LC_DYLIB_CODE_SIGN_DRS load commands.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282441 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch improves thinlto importer
by importing 3x larger functions that are called from hot block.
I compared performance with the trunk on spec, and there
were about 2% on povray and 3.33% on milc. These results seems
to be consistant and match the results Teresa got with her simple
heuristic. Some benchmarks got slower but I think they are just
noisy (mcf, xalancbmki, omnetpp)- running the benchmarks again with
more iterations to confirm. Geomean of all benchmarks including the noisy ones
were about +0.02%.
I see much better improvement on google branch with Easwaran patch
for pgo callsite inlining (the inliner actually inline those big functions)
Over all I see +0.5% improvement, and I get +8.65% on povray.
So I guess we will see much bigger change when Easwaran patch will land
(it depends on new pass manager), but it is still worth putting this to trunk
before it.
Implementation details changes:
- Removed CallsiteCount.
- ProfileCount got replaced by Hotness
- hot-import-multiplier is set to 3.0 for now,
didn't have time to tune it up, but I see that we get most of the interesting
functions with 3, so there is no much performance difference with higher, and
binary size doesn't grow as much as with 10.0.
Reviewers: eraman, mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24638
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282437 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If coroutine has no suspend points, remove heap allocation and turn a coroutine into a normal function.
Also, if a pattern is detected that coroutine resumes or destroys itself prior to coro.suspend call, turn the suspend point into a simple jump to resume or cleanup label. This pattern occurs when coroutines are used to propagate errors in functions that return expected<T>.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24408
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282414 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Don't match the UXTW extended reg forms of ADD/ADDS/SUB/SUBS if the
32-bit to 64-bit zero-extend can be done for free by taking advantage
of the 32-bit defining instruction zeroing the upper 32-bits of the X
register destination. This enables better instruction selection in a
few cases, such as:
sub x0, xzr, x8
instead of:
mov x8, xzr
sub x0, x8, w9, uxtw
madd x0, x1, x1, x8
instead of:
mul x9, x1, x1
add x0, x9, w8, uxtw
cmp x2, x8
instead of:
sub x8, x2, w8, uxtw
cmp x8, #0
add x0, x8, x1, lsl #3
instead of:
lsl x9, x1, #3
add x0, x9, w8, uxtw
Reviewers: t.p.northover, jmolloy
Subscribers: mcrosier, aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24747
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Many high-performance processors have a dedicated branch predictor for
indirect branches, commonly used with jump tables. As sophisticated as such
branch predictors are, they tend to have well defined limits beyond which
their effectiveness is hampered or even nullified. One such limit is the
number of possible destinations for a given indirect branches that such
branch predictors can handle.
This patch considers a limit that a target may set to the number of
destination addresses in a jump table.
Patch by: Evandro Menezes <e.menezes@samsung.com>, Aditya Kumar
<aditya.k7@samsung.com>, Sebastian Pop <s.pop@samsung.com>.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21940
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282412 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The index of the new insertelement instruction was evaluated in the
wrong way, it was considered as the index of the inserted value instead
of index of the position, where the value should be inserted.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282401 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch fixes PR30366.
Function foldUDivShl() worked under the assumption that one of the values
in input to the function was always an instance of llvm::Instruction.
However, function visitUDivOperand() (the only user of foldUDivShl) was
clearly violating that precondition; internally, visitUDivOperand() uses pattern
matches to check the operands of a udiv. Pattern matchers for binary operators
know how to handle both Instruction and ConstantExpr values.
This patch fixes the problem in foldUDivShl(). Now we use pattern matchers
instead of explicit casts to Instruction. The reduced test case from PR30366
has been added to test file InstCombine/udiv-simplify.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24565
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282398 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If a constant is unamed_addr and is only used within one function, we can save
on the code size and runtime cost of an indirection by changing the global's storage
to inside the constant pool. For example, instead of:
ldr r0, .CPI0
bl printf
bx lr
.CPI0: &format_string
format_string: .asciz "hello, world!\n"
We can emit:
adr r0, .CPI0
bl printf
bx lr
.CPI0: .asciz "hello, world!\n"
This can cause significant code size savings when many small strings are used in one
function (4 bytes per string).
This recommit contains fixes for a nasty bug related to fast-isel fallback - because
fast-isel doesn't know about this optimization, if it runs and emits references to
a string that we inline (because fast-isel fell back to SDAG) we will end up
with an inlined string and also an out-of-line string, and we won't emit the
out-of-line string, causing backend failures.
It also contains fixes for emitting .text relocations which made the sanitizer
bots unhappy.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Replace a LEA instruction of the form 'lea (%esp), %ebx' --> 'mov %esp, %ebx'
MOV is preferable over LEA because usually there are more issue-slots available to execute MOVs than LEAs. Latest processors also support zero-latency MOVs.
Fixes pr29022.
Reviewers: hfinkel, delena, igorb, myatsina, mkuper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24705
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is similar to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279958
By not prematurely lowering to loads, we should be able to more easily eliminate
the 'or' with zero instructions seen in copysign-constant-magnitude.ll.
We should also be able to extend this code to handle vectors.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282312 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
As suggested in D24826, use different options for ThinLTO backend
parallelism from the option controlling regular LTO code gen
parallelism. They are already split in the LTO API, and this enables
controlling them with different clang options.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24873
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282290 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
... so that they don't show up in the index. This came up because polly
contains a .git directory and some other unmapped input in its source
dir.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@282282 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
