This is a functional change for LLE and LDist. The other clients (LV,
LVerLICM) already had this explicitly enabled.
The temporary boolean parameter to LAA is removed that allowed turning
off speculation of symbolic strides. This makes LAA's caching interface
LAA::getInfo only take the loop as the parameter. This makes the
interface more friendly to the new Pass Manager.
The flag -enable-mem-access-versioning is moved from LV to a LAA which
now allows turning off speculation globally.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@273064 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is still NFCI, so the list of clients that allow symbolic stride
speculation does not change (yes: LV and LoopVersioningLICM, no: LLE,
LDist). However since the symbolic strides are now managed by LAA
rather than passed by client a new bool parameter is used to enable
symbolic stride speculation.
The existing test Transforms/LoopVectorize/version-mem-access.ll checks
that stride speculation is performed for LV.
The previously added test Transforms/LoopLoadElim/symbolic-stride.ll
ensures that no speculation is performed for LLE.
The next patch will change the functionality and turn on symbolic stride
speculation in all of LAA's clients and remove the bool parameter.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272970 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Turns out SymbolicStrides is actually used in canVectorizeWithIfConvert
before it gets set up in canVectorizeMemory.
This works fine as long as SymbolicStrides resides in LV since we just
have an empty map. Based on this the conclusion is made that there are
no symbolic strides which is conservatively correct.
However once SymbolicStrides becomes part of LAI, LAI is nullptr at this
point so we need to differentiate the uninitialized state by returning a
nullptr for SymbolicStrides.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272966 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopVectorizationLegality holds a constant reference to LAI, so this
will have to be const as well.
Also added missed function comment.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272851 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
r272715 broke libcxx because it did not correctly handle cases where the
last iteration of one IV is the second-to-last iteration of another.
Original commit message:
Vectorizing loops with "escaping" IVs has been disabled since r190790, due to
PR17179. This re-enables it, with support for external use of both
"post-increment" (last iteration) and "pre-increment" (second-to-last iteration)
IVs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Vectorizing loops with "escaping" IVs has been disabled since r190790, due to
PR17179. This re-enables it, with support for external use of both
"post-increment" (last iteration) and "pre-increment" (second-to-last iteration)
IVs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21048
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272715 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, we materialized secondary vector IVs from the primary scalar IV,
by offseting the primary to match the correct start value, and then broadcasting
it - inside the loop body. Instead, we can use a real vector IV, like we do for
the primary.
This enables using vector IVs for secondary integer IVs whose type matches the
type of the primary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20932
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@272283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, whenever we needed a vector IV, we would create it on the fly,
by splatting the scalar IV and adding a step vector. Instead, we can create a
real vector IV. This tends to save a couple of instructions per iteration.
This only changes the behavior for the most basic case - integer primary
IVs with a constant step.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20315
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@271410 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In truncateToMinimalBitwidths() we were RAUW'ing an instruction then erasing it. However, that intruction could be cached in the map we're iterating over. The first check is "I->use_empty()" which in most cases would return true, as the (deleted) object was RAUW'd first so would have zero use count. However in some cases the object could have been polluted or written over and this wouldn't be the case. Also it makes valgrind, asan and traditionalists who don't like their compiler to crash sad.
No testcase as there are no externally visible symptoms apart from a crash if the stars align.
Fixes PR26509.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269908 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The selection of the vectorization factor currently doesn't consider
interleaved accesses. The vectorization factor is based on the maximum safe
dependence distance computed by LAA. However, for loops with interleaved
groups, we should instead base the vectorization factor on the maximum safe
dependence distance divided by the maximum interleave factor of all the
interleaved groups. Interleaved accesses not in a group will be scalarized.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20241
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269659 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
LoopVectorBody was changed from a single pointer to a SmallVector when
store predication was introduced in r200270. Since r247139, store predication
no longer splits the vector loop body in-place, so we can go back to having
a single LoopVectorBody block.
This reverts the no-longer-needed changes from r200270.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269321 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Allow vectorization when the step is a loop-invariant variable.
This is the loop example that is getting vectorized after the patch:
int int_inc;
int bar(int init, int *restrict A, int N) {
int x = init;
for (int i=0;i<N;i++){
A[i] = x;
x += int_inc;
}
return x;
}
"x" is an induction variable with *loop-invariant* step.
But it is not a primary induction. Primary induction variable with non-constant step is not handled yet.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19258
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@269023 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Some PHIs can have expressions that are not AddRecExprs due to the presence
of sext/zext instructions. In order to prevent the Loop Vectorizer from
bailing out when encountering these PHIs, we now coerce the SCEV
expressions to AddRecExprs using SCEV predicates (when possible).
We only do this when the alternative would be to not vectorize.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, anemet
Subscribers: mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17153
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268633 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This moves the validation of PHI inductions into a
separate method, making it easier to reuse this
logic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@268632 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We need to keep loop hints from the original loop on the new vector loop.
Failure to do this meant that, for example:
void foo(int *b) {
#pragma clang loop unroll(disable)
for (int i = 0; i < 16; ++i)
b[i] = 1;
}
this loop would be unrolled. Why? Because we'd vectorize it, thus dropping the
hints that unrolling should be disabled, and then we'd unroll it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267970 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We previously disallowed interleaved load groups that may cause us to
speculatively access memory out-of-bounds (r261331). We did this by ensuring
each load group had an access corresponding to the first and last member.
Instead of bailing out for these interleaved groups, this patch enables us to
peel off the last vector iteration, ensuring that we execute at least one
iteration of the scalar remainder loop. This solution was proposed in the
review of the previous patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19487
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267751 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I really thought we were doing this already, but we were not. Given this input:
void Test(int *res, int *c, int *d, int *p) {
for (int i = 0; i < 16; i++)
res[i] = (p[i] == 0) ? res[i] : res[i] + d[i];
}
we did not vectorize the loop. Even with "assume_safety" the check that we
don't if-convert conditionally-executed loads (to protect against
data-dependent deferenceability) was not elided.
One subtlety: As implemented, it will still prefer to use a masked-load
instrinsic (given target support) over the speculated load. The choice here
seems architecture specific; the best option depends on how expensive the
masked load is compared to a regular load. Ideally, using the masked load still
reduces unnecessary memory traffic, and so should be preferred. If we'd rather
do it the other way, flipping the order of the checks is easy.
The LangRef is updated to make explicit that llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access also
implies that if conversion is okay.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19512
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267514 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch implements a optimization bisect feature, which will allow optimizations to be selectively disabled at compile time in order to track down test failures that are caused by incorrect optimizations.
The bisection is enabled using a new command line option (-opt-bisect-limit). Individual passes that may be skipped call the OptBisect object (via an LLVMContext) to see if they should be skipped based on the bisect limit. A finer level of control (disabling individual transformations) can be managed through an addition OptBisect method, but this is not yet used.
The skip checking in this implementation is based on (and replaces) the skipOptnoneFunction check. Where that check was being called, a new call has been inserted in its place which checks the bisect limit and the optnone attribute. A new function call has been added for module and SCC passes that behaves in a similar way.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19172
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@267022 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The functionality contained within getIntrinsicIDForCall is two-fold: it
checks if a CallInst's callee is a vectorizable intrinsic. If it isn't
an intrinsic, it attempts to map the call's target to a suitable
intrinsic.
Move the mapping functionality into getIntrinsicForCallSite and rename
getIntrinsicIDForCall to getVectorIntrinsicIDForCall while
reimplementing it in terms of getIntrinsicForCallSite.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266801 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Some SIMD implementations are not IEEE-754 compliant, for example ARM's NEON.
This patch teaches the loop vectorizer to only allow transformations of loops
that either contain no floating-point operations or have enough allowance
flags supporting lack of precision (ex. -ffast-math, Darwin).
For that, the target description now has a method which tells us if the
vectorizer is allowed to handle FP math without falling into unsafe
representations, plus a check on every FP instruction in the candidate loop
to check for the safety flags.
This commit makes LLVM behave like GCC with respect to ARM NEON support, but
it stops short of fixing the underlying problem: sub-normals. Neither GCC
nor LLVM have a flag for allowing sub-normal operations. Before this patch,
GCC only allows it using unsafe-math flags and LLVM allows it by default with
no way to turn it off (short of not using NEON at all).
As a first step, we push this change to make it safe and in sync with GCC.
The second step is to discuss a new sub-normal's flag on both communitues
and come up with a common solution. The third step is to improve the FastMath
flags in LLVM to encode sub-normals and use those flags to restrict NEON FP.
Fixes PR16275.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266363 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The behavior of {MIN,MAX}NAN differs from that of {MIN,MAX}NUM when only
one of the inputs is NaN: -NUM will return the non-NaN argument while
-NAN would return NaN.
It is desirable to lower to @llvm.{min,max}num to -NAN if they don't
have a native instruction for -NUM. Notably, ARMv7 NEON's vmin has the
-NAN semantics.
N.B. Of course, it is only safe to do this if the intrinsic call is
marked nnan.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@266279 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
InstCombine cannot effectively remove redundant assumptions without them
registered in the assumption cache. The vectorizer can create identical
assumptions but doesn't register them with the cache, resulting in
slower compile times because InstCombine tries to reason about a lot
more assumptions.
Fix this by registering the cloned assumptions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265800 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This re-commits r265535 which was reverted in r265541 because it
broke the windows bots. The problem was that we had a PointerIntPair
which took a pointer to a struct allocated with new. The problem
was that new doesn't provide sufficient alignment guarantees.
This pattern was already present before r265535 and it just happened
to work. To fix this, we now separate the PointerToIntPair from the
ExitNotTakenInfo struct into a pointer and a bool.
Original commit message:
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265786 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
When the backedge taken codition is computed from an icmp, SCEV can
deduce the backedge taken count only if one of the sides of the icmp
is an AddRecExpr. However, due to sign/zero extensions, we sometimes
end up with something that is not an AddRecExpr.
However, we can use SCEV predicates to produce a 'guarded' expression.
This change adds a method to SCEV to get this expression, and the
SCEV predicate associated with it.
In HowManyGreaterThans and HowManyLessThans we will now add a SCEV
predicate associated with the guarded backedge taken count when the
analyzed SCEV expression is not an AddRecExpr. Note that we only do
this as an alternative to returning a 'CouldNotCompute'.
We use new feature in Loop Access Analysis and LoopVectorize to analyze
and transform more loops.
Reviewers: anemet, mzolotukhin, hfinkel, sanjoy
Subscribers: flyingforyou, mcrosier, atrick, mssimpso, sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17201
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@265535 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This change prevents the loop vectorizer from vectorizing when all of the vector
types it generates will be scalarized. I've run into this problem on the PPC's QPX
vector ISA, which only holds floating-point vector types. The loop vectorizer
will, however, happily vectorize loops with purely integer computation. Here's
an example:
LV: The Smallest and Widest types: 32 / 32 bits.
LV: The Widest register is: 256 bits.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 1 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 1 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Scalar loop costs: 3.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 2 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 2 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 2 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 2 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Vector loop of width 2 costs: 2.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %indvars.iv25 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next26, %for.body ]
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1600 x i32], [1600 x i32]* %a, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv25
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: %2 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv25 to i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 4 for VF 4 For instruction: store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 4 For instruction: %indvars.iv.next26 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv25, 1
LV: Found an estimated cost of 1 for VF 4 For instruction: %exitcond27 = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next26, 1600
LV: Found an estimated cost of 0 for VF 4 For instruction: br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
LV: Vector loop of width 4 costs: 1.
...
LV: Selecting VF: 8.
LV: The target has 32 registers
LV(REG): Calculating max register usage:
LV(REG): At #0 Interval # 0
LV(REG): At #1 Interval # 1
LV(REG): At #2 Interval # 2
LV(REG): At #4 Interval # 1
LV(REG): At #5 Interval # 1
LV(REG): VF = 8
The problem is that the cost model here is not wrong, exactly. Since all of
these operations are scalarized, their cost (aside from the uniform ones) are
indeed VF*(scalar cost), just as the model suggests. In fact, the larger the VF
picked, the lower the relative overhead from the loop itself (and the
induction-variable update and check), and so in a sense, picking the largest VF
here is the right thing to do.
The problem is that vectorizing like this, where all of the vectors will be
scalarized in the backend, isn't really vectorizing, but rather interleaving.
By itself, this would be okay, but then the vectorizer itself also interleaves,
and that's where the problem manifests itself. There's aren't actually enough
scalar registers to support the normal interleave factor multiplied by a factor
of VF (8 in this example). In other words, the problem with this is that our
register-pressure heuristic does not account for scalarization.
While we might want to improve our register-pressure heuristic, I don't think
this is the right motivating case for that work. Here we have a more-basic
problem: The job of the vectorizer is to vectorize things (interleaving aside),
and if the IR it generates won't generate any actual vector code, then
something is wrong. Thus, if every type looks like it will be scalarized (i.e.
will be split into VF or more parts), then don't consider that VF.
This is not a problem specific to PPC/QPX, however. The problem comes up under
SSE on x86 too, and as such, this change fixes PR26837 too. I've added Sanjay's
reduced test case from PR26837 to this commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18537
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@264904 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
