Add support for official MCP Registry #2123

Open
opened 2026-02-16 17:34:15 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @adam-paterson on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

The official MCP Registry (https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/tree/main) provides a centralized way to discover and manage MCP servers. Integrating this would allow OpenCode users to easily browse and install available MCP servers from both public and private registries, improving the ecosystem and user experience.

Benefits:

  • Easier discovery of MCP servers without manual configuration
  • Support for private registries for enterprise use
  • Standardized way to share and distribute MCP servers
  • Reduces friction in setting up new tools and integrations

This would enhance OpenCode's MCP capabilities by making server management more user-friendly and scalable.

Originally created by @adam-paterson on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. The official MCP Registry (https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/registry/tree/main) provides a centralized way to discover and manage MCP servers. Integrating this would allow OpenCode users to easily browse and install available MCP servers from both public and private registries, improving the ecosystem and user experience. Benefits: - Easier discovery of MCP servers without manual configuration - Support for private registries for enterprise use - Standardized way to share and distribute MCP servers - Reduces friction in setting up new tools and integrations This would enhance OpenCode's MCP capabilities by making server management more user-friendly and scalable.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025):

This issue might be related to existing issues about MCP server management and discovery. Please check:

  • #2418: Feature request for tools to list and manage MCP servers to reduce context window - discusses MCP server management and granular control
  • #1899: Command to show available MCP servers - requests functionality to display configured MCP servers
  • #3087: Plug-ins repository - discusses community repository for plugins/extensions
  • #514: Option to enable/disable MCP servers via TUI - relates to MCP server management interface

While these don't directly address registry integration, they touch on similar themes around MCP server discovery, management, and user experience improvements. Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific registry integration request.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025): This issue might be related to existing issues about MCP server management and discovery. Please check: - #2418: Feature request for tools to list and manage MCP servers to reduce context window - discusses MCP server management and granular control - #1899: Command to show available MCP servers - requests functionality to display configured MCP servers - #3087: Plug-ins repository - discusses community repository for plugins/extensions - #514: Option to enable/disable MCP servers via TUI - relates to MCP server management interface While these don't directly address registry integration, they touch on similar themes around MCP server discovery, management, and user experience improvements. Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific registry integration request.
Author
Owner

@adam-paterson commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025):

Yes, I used OpenCode + Grok to create that issue, and I wouldn't change a word of it 🥇

@adam-paterson commented on GitHub (Oct 16, 2025): Yes, I used OpenCode + Grok to create that issue, and I wouldn't change a word of it 🥇
Author
Owner

@adam-paterson commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2025):

Happy to pick this up if you're accepting contributions

@adam-paterson commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2025): Happy to pick this up if you're accepting contributions
Author
Owner

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2025):

we do accept contributions but it kinda depends on the AC here, can you outline your expectation better? How would it work

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Oct 18, 2025): we do accept contributions but it kinda depends on the AC here, can you outline your expectation better? How would it work
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#2123