[FEATURE]: Terminal Bench 2.0 evaluation #3274

Open
opened 2026-02-16 17:39:28 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @rodion-m on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025).

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

Hi OpenCode team! Thank you for a great product. It would be great for OpenCode marketing purposes to evaluate your harness in Terminal Bench 2.0. Perhay you evaluated it before?

Originally created by @rodion-m on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025). ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request Hi OpenCode team! Thank you for a great product. It would be great for OpenCode marketing purposes to evaluate your harness in Terminal Bench 2.0. Perhay you evaluated it before?
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 17:39:28 -05:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #2104: Submit to Terminal-Bench - A previous request to submit OpenCode to the Terminal Bench leaderboard for performance comparison.

Feel free to ignore if your specific case requires something different.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #2104: Submit to Terminal-Bench - A previous request to submit OpenCode to the Terminal Bench leaderboard for performance comparison. Feel free to ignore if your specific case requires something different.
Author
Owner

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025):

We are working on our own benchmarks, but I'd refer you to this:
https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2104#issuecomment-3215423015

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 3, 2025): We are working on our own benchmarks, but I'd refer you to this: https://github.com/sst/opencode/issues/2104#issuecomment-3215423015
Author
Owner

@rodion-m commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2025):

@rekram1-node thanks for the answer! Same results as CC - it's very good actually. But it will be interesting to see OpenCode's score in Terminal Bench 2.0 on open source LLMs. @thdxr what about Terminal Bench 2.0? Is it still "academic puzzle"? (I don't know and really curious). Btw, I'm a founder of CodeAlive context engine, we're also looking for good benchmarks, we don't explore a new terminal bench yet.

@rodion-m commented on GitHub (Dec 9, 2025): @rekram1-node thanks for the answer! Same results as CC - it's very good actually. But it will be interesting to see OpenCode's score in Terminal Bench 2.0 on open source LLMs. @thdxr what about Terminal Bench 2.0? Is it still "academic puzzle"? (I don't know and really curious). Btw, I'm a founder of CodeAlive context engine, we're also looking for good benchmarks, we don't explore a new terminal bench yet.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#3274