anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Which version is the most token-efficient #8652

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-16 18:10:30 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:10:30 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @HappyHippo-ZDD on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @fwang on GitHub.

Question

Our company's internal large model only supports a context of 64K. When using OpenCode, we often receive a prompt stating that the range of input length should be [1,98304].
I've noticed a peculiar feature: when I use version 1.1.36, the probability of this prompt appearing is significantly reduced. However, if I use version 1.1.51, the likelihood of encountering issues increases noticeably.
I haven't tested every version. What I want to know is which version consumes the least tokens

Originally created by @HappyHippo-ZDD on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026). Originally assigned to: @fwang on GitHub. ### Question Our company's internal large model only supports a context of 64K. When using OpenCode, we often receive a prompt stating that the range of input length should be [1,98304]. I've noticed a peculiar feature: when I use version 1.1.36, the probability of this prompt appearing is significantly reduced. However, if I use version 1.1.51, the likelihood of encountering issues increases noticeably. I haven't tested every version. What I want to know is which version consumes the least tokens
yindo added the zen label 2026-02-16 18:10:30 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:10:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #11080: Error: Token refresh failed: 401 (version-specific token issues with version 1.1.40)
  • #10909: Error: Token refresh failed: 401 (same version 1.1.36 mentioned in your issue, token-related errors)
  • #10793: Feature request about distinguishing input vs output tokens (relates to input length handling)
  • #9193: Token Consideration (general token efficiency concerns)

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 5, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #11080: Error: Token refresh failed: 401 (version-specific token issues with version 1.1.40) - #10909: Error: Token refresh failed: 401 (same version 1.1.36 mentioned in your issue, token-related errors) - #10793: Feature request about distinguishing input vs output tokens (relates to input length handling) - #9193: Token Consideration (general token efficiency concerns) Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label zen
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#8652
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?