@expo/code-review-cli

A config-driven, multi-agent AI code reviewer. Specialist agents review a diff in parallel; a coordinator consolidates their findings into one structured review. The same engine runs locally (advisory) and in CI (posts one PR comment). The CLI is the engine — each repo supplies its own agents and settings under .expo-code-review/, so behavior is configured per-repo, not baked in.

Status: experimental. Comment-only and non-blocking — it never blocks a merge and never auto-approves. See ROADMAP.md.

Inspired in part by Cloudflare's How we built our AI code review bot.

flowchart TD
  SRC["Source<br/>local git · GitHub PR (gh)"] --> FILTER["Noise filter<br/>drop lockfiles · generated · binary"]
  FILTER --> CHUNK["Chunk<br/>by changed lines (large diffs only)"]
  CHUNK --> AGENTS["Agents (parallel)<br/>each .md in agents/ · read·grep·glob·list"]
  CHUNK --> XCUT["Cross-cutting pass<br/>multi-file issues (large diffs)"]
  AGENTS --> COORD["Coordinator<br/>dedupe · re-judge · decide"]
  XCUT --> COORD
  COORD --> VERIFY["Verify<br/>quote-ground · adversarially verify criticals"]
  VERIFY --> REPORT["Reporter<br/>one PR comment (CI) · terminal (local)"]

Usage

Run via npx @expo/code-review-cli <command> (or the ecr / expo-code-review binary once installed).

Reviewing a PR (--pr/ci) needs the GitHub CLI — brew install gh && gh auth login. Everything else the reviewer needs (including the opencode runtime) ships with the package.

First-time setup

Scaffold, add credentials, verify.

# Scaffold .expo-code-review/ + a CI workflow (--no-workflow to skip)
npx @expo/code-review-cli init

Then give it model credentials. Recommended: a Claude Pro/Max subscription — the scaffolded config uses OAuth by default, so just mint a token and export it under the env var your config.jsonc's auth.tokenEnv names:

# Mint a Claude Pro/Max token (prints an sk-ant-oat… token)
claude setup-token
# Export it under the env var your config.jsonc's auth.tokenEnv names
export ANTHROPIC_OAUTH_API_KEY=sk-ant-oat...
# Check env, config, and credentials
npx @expo/code-review-cli doctor

Prefer an Anthropic API key, or OpenAI/GPT or another provider? See Other providers & auth modes at the bottom.

Reviewing (already configured)

# Review working-tree changes; prints here, posts nothing
ecr review
# Review a GitHub PR by number (preview only)
ecr review --pr 4057
# …and post it as the PR comment
ecr review --pr 4057 --post

Options (most to least common):

Flag	What it does
--pr <n>	Review GitHub PR #n by number (diff fetched via gh, no checkout); not combinable with --base/--head/--staged.
--post	With --pr, also post the result as the PR comment (needs gh auth). Omit to preview only; re-run with --post to publish.
--staged	Review only staged changes.
--base <ref>	Base ref to diff against (default: merge-base with the default branch).
--head <ref>	Head ref to diff (default: working tree, incl. uncommitted changes).
--agents <a,b>	Run only these agents (comma-separated ids); default: all.
--route	Let an LLM router pick the relevant agents from the diff.
--repo <owner/repo>	Repo for --pr (default: inferred from the current checkout).
--json	Emit machine-readable JSON on stdout.
--no-fail	Always exit 0 (otherwise a request_changes decision exits non-zero).
-h, --help	Show help.

--pr uses the PR's diff (authoritative) and checks the PR head out into a throwaway worktree so the agents' surrounding-source reads and the verifier see the PR's versions of files — no manual gh pr checkout needed, and your working tree is left untouched. (If that materialization can't run — e.g. not a git checkout — it falls back to reading the current working directory.)

In CI it runs automatically from the scaffolded workflows — by label or a /review comment (see CI usage). From Claude Code (or another agent), add a slash command that runs it; eas-cli's /expo-review is a ready example to adapt.

Command reference

Command	What it does
ecr init [--no-workflow] [--force]	Scaffold .expo-code-review/ (config, agents, prompts) + a CI workflow.
ecr review [options]	Review local changes and print an advisory review (default command).
ecr ci	Review the current GitHub PR and post/update a comment. For GitHub Actions.
ecr doctor	Check environment, config, and model credentials.

(When developing this repo itself, use bun run src/cli.ts <command>.)

---

How it works

• Source — local git (working tree, staged, or a ref range) or a GitHub PR (diff + metadata fetched over the gh API).
• Noise filter — drops lockfiles, generated bundles/maps, snapshots, files matching the repo's additionalIgnores, and binary files (no textual diff to review). Filtered files are recorded, not silently dropped.
• Chunking — small PRs run in a single pass; large PRs are split into chunks bounded by changed lines, plus one combined cross-cutting pass that looks for issues spanning multiple changed files across every agent's concern.
• Agents — every .md file in .expo-code-review/agents/ is an agent. They run in parallel with read-only repo tools (read/grep/glob/list).
• Coordinator — a single pass that dedupes, re-judges severity, and produces the final { decision, findings, summary }.
• Verify — quote-grounds every finding against the real file and adversarially verifies criticals, so a confident-but-wrong finding doesn't ship.
• Reporter — posts/updates a single fingerprinted PR comment (CI), or prints a grouped summary (local). Findings below the configured severity floor are suppressed.

Built on the OpenCode SDK, which spawns the model provider and applies Anthropic prompt caching automatically.

Configuration — .expo-code-review/

.expo-code-review/
  config.jsonc        # model, policy, noise, auth, break-glass, comment tag
  shared.md           # instructions prepended to every agent (optional)
  coordinator.md      # the consolidation prompt (required)
  agents/
    correctness.md    # each .md here is an agent (id = filename)
    security.md
    consistency.md

shared.md and coordinator.md are reserved names; every other .md in agents/ becomes an agent. Per-agent overrides go in each file's frontmatter:

---
description: One line the router uses to decide relevance.
alwaysRun: true        # run even when the router would skip this agent
model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-5     # override the default model
temperature: 0.1
---

# Agent instructions in Markdown…

For a real-world example, see eas-cli's .expo-code-review/ — correctness/security/consistency agents, Opus for security + the coordinator, and per-repo noise.additionalIgnores.

config.jsonc (JSONC — comments + trailing commas supported):

{
  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-5",       // default model for the specialists
  "policy": { "includeSuggestions": false },  // suppress suggestion-severity findings
  "chunk": { "maxChangedLines": 1000, "maxFiles": 20, "concurrency": 6 },
  "noise": { "additionalIgnores": ["packages/*/build/**"] },
  "breakGlass": { "marker": "/skip-review" }, // PR body marker that skips the review
  "commentTag": "expo-ai-code-reviewer",      // hidden tag used to find/update the comment
  "auth": { "mode": "oauth", "provider": "anthropic",
            "tokenEnv": "ANTHROPIC_OAUTH_API_KEY" }
}

Model selection

Precedence: REVIEWER_MODEL env (global override) → per-file frontmatter model: → config.jsonc model (the default). So a repo can run a mixed setup, and a developer can override everything locally.

• Specialist agents (correctness/security/consistency) benefit from a reasoning-tier model — Sonnet is the quality/speed sweet spot (default for correctness/consistency). Opus finds more but is slower and more rate-limited, so scope it to the highest-stakes agent: security runs on Opus (set in security.md frontmatter), the rest on Sonnet.
• The coordinator makes the final call (dedupe / re-judge / decide) — worth a strong model; set it in coordinator.md frontmatter.
• If latency/timeouts dominate on big PRs, moving the specialists to a faster model is the most direct lever (a real recall tradeoff — measure it).

There is no automatic cross-provider "equivalent" fallback — that would silently change which model reviewed your code. Use an explicit override instead.

Reliability — never hangs, never silently drops work

• Per-task time caps — chunk passes 15 min; cross-cutting 25 min; coordinator 10 min. A global passes budget (32 min) bounds all passes incl. the subdivision waves, fitting inside the CI job's timeout-minutes (60).
• Tool-call cap — a pass that makes too many read/grep calls without finishing is wandering, not converging; hitting the cap trips the soft landing.
• Soft landing on timeout — at either cap, the run is interrupted and the agent is asked to return the findings it already has, rather than discarding its work.
• Subdivide-on-timeout — a pass that times out with nothing to show has its chunk split in half and the halves re-reviewed (recursively, down to a single file), then a fast no-tools fallback over the inlined diff. Only a genuinely un-reducible pass reports a coverage gap — and it is always reported, never silent.
• Parse failures are retried (same session, then once in a bounded fresh session) — separate from the timeout path.
• A failed run never reads as "Approve" — all passes fail → "could not complete"; some fail → never a clean approve, and coverage-reduced.
• The coordinator can't sink the run — if consolidation fails, findings are merged deterministically and still posted.
• Coverage notes — passes that timed out/failed are listed (routine noise filtering is not flagged — it's expected and stays in the run log).
• CI always gets a terminal state — on any failure the PR gets a "didn't run" comment, not a stuck reaction and silence.

CI usage

ecr init --with-workflow scaffolds a pull_request workflow. Split along a clean line: comments = one-shot actions, labels = persistent configuration.

• command workflow — one-shot /review comments (maintainers): /review (router picks agents), /review all, /review correctness security. Never changes configuration.
• auto workflow — continuous review, configured by labels: ai-review (router), ai-review:all, ai-review:<agent> (e.g. ai-review:security; combine to widen), ai-review:skip (opt-out).
• dismiss workflow — /dismiss <id> [… -- reason] / /undismiss <id> (maintainers). Each finding shows a short `id:…`. Dismissal is a display filter only — the reviewer still analyzes everything, and a critical/secrets finding can never be hidden. (An inline expo-code-review-ignore comment on/above a line does the same, with the same critical/secrets carve-out.)

These workflows are comment-only (they never fail the PR's checks). The engine runs as the published package via npx, so no PR-controlled code is built.

Run logs

Each run appends a JSON line to .expo-code-review/.runs/reviews.jsonl with the inputs, decision, finding count, duration, per-agent cost, and aggregate token usage (incl. prompt-cache read/write counts) — for auditing and measuring cost/latency/cache reuse over time.

Other providers & auth modes

The recommended setup is a Claude Pro/Max subscription (OAuth) — see Usage above. Alternatives, all set in config.auth (credentials come from OpenCode):

• Anthropic API key — set auth.mode to "api-key" and point tokenEnv at the env var holding the key (e.g. ANTHROPIC_API_KEY); it's sent as x-api-key. Omit the auth block entirely to fall back to OpenCode's own login / ANTHROPIC_API_KEY.
• OAuth (Pro/Max) — tokenEnv holds an sk-ant-oat… token from claude setup-token (not an x-api-key); it's written to an isolated OpenCode auth.json as a bearer credential, using the native subscription path.
• OpenAI / GPT, or another provider — the current path is the REVIEWER_MODEL env override: opencode auth login once (pick the provider), then run with e.g. REVIEWER_MODEL=openai/gpt-5.4-mini-fast. It overrides every agent's model and uses your OpenCode login, so no auth block is needed. (First-class per-provider config — Anthropic/OpenAI/others in config.jsonc, and mixing them per agent — is on the roadmap.)

There is no shared fallback key; if a run fails for lack of credentials, authenticate a provider in OpenCode. ecr doctor diagnoses setup.