langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 20:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Integrate Prompt Versioning in Dify's LLM Block #6881

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:17:47 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:17:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @jazzhongsains on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

Yes. I'm facing challenges with Langfuse's system prompt feature due to the lack of versioning and tagging capabilities. This creates problems when prompts are accidentally edited, as there's no simple rollback mechanism.

2. Additional context or comments

The main focus is prompt versioning to be included in Dify's LLM block to safeguard against errors due to unapproved prompt changes.

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @jazzhongsains on GitHub (Nov 21, 2024). ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:） - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. Yes. I'm facing challenges with Langfuse's system prompt feature due to the lack of versioning and tagging capabilities. This creates problems when prompts are accidentally edited, as there's no simple rollback mechanism. ### 2. Additional context or comments The main focus is prompt versioning to be included in Dify's LLM block to safeguard against errors due to unapproved prompt changes. ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 18:17:47 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:17:48 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:17:48 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@huynhbaobk commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2024):

waiting for this feature to be released

@huynhbaobk commented on GitHub (Dec 15, 2024): waiting for this feature to be released
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:17:48 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2025):

Hi, @jazzhongsains. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary

  • The issue addresses the need for prompt versioning in Dify's LLM block.
  • Lack of versioning and tagging in Langfuse's system prompt feature makes reverting edits difficult.
  • User huynhbaobk showed interest in this feature, supported by a thumbs-up from iamthemulti.

Next Steps

  • Please let us know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting here.
  • If there is no further activity, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2025): Hi, @jazzhongsains. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog. I'm marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary** - The issue addresses the need for prompt versioning in Dify's LLM block. - Lack of versioning and tagging in Langfuse's system prompt feature makes reverting edits difficult. - User huynhbaobk showed interest in this feature, supported by a thumbs-up from iamthemulti. **Next Steps** - Please let us know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the Dify repository by commenting here. - If there is no further activity, this issue will be automatically closed in 15 days. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#6881
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?