Mark Wielaard c0748eff84 libelf: More checking of valid sh_addralign values.
There were two issues with bogus sh_addralign values. First we would only
check the individual Elf_Data d_align values were powerof2. But not the
actual shdr addralign value. This would cause an issue if the shdr addralign
was bigger than all of the individual d_align values. Then we could write
out a bogus (! powerof2) shdr addralign value for the sections. Secondly
when reading in the Elf_Data we would set the d_align value to the value
of the shdr addralign value. But we would not check it was valid at all.
In practice there are ELF files with incorrect sh_addralign values (they
are a powerof2, but aren't aligned to the ELF image offset). We would try
to fix that up in elf_update by adding extra padding. But this could bloat
the ELF image a lot for large alignment values. So for too large alignments
that are bigger than the offset in the ELF file clamp them to the offset
value. This could lead us to reject to write out the data again when the
offset was not a powerof2. But this will only happen for aligment values
bigger than 64. Which are uncommon in practice.

Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
2015-05-18 15:48:04 +02:00
2015-04-28 14:41:12 +02:00
2014-12-18 23:47:22 +01:00
2014-04-18 11:46:51 +02:00
2014-12-18 23:41:41 +01:00
2015-05-05 10:36:53 +02:00
2009-01-10 18:17:09 -08:00
2015-05-04 15:56:13 +02:00
2013-08-21 10:41:12 +02:00
2005-07-26 05:00:05 +00:00
2015-03-31 19:01:40 +02:00
2005-07-26 05:00:05 +00:00
2009-01-10 18:17:09 -08:00

Fundamental design decision:

- the sizes of external and internal types are assumed to be the same.
  This leaves byte ordering aside.  While assuming this the code can be
  greatly simplified and speed increases.  Since no change violating this
  assumption is in sight this is believed to be a worthwhile optimization.

- the ABI of the backend modules is not guaranteed.  Really, no guarantee
  whatsoever.  We are enforcing this in the code.  The modules and their
  users must match.  No third-party EBL module are supported or allowed.
  The only reason there are separate modules is to not have the code for
  all architectures in all the binaries.

- although the public libraries (libasm, libdw) have a stable API and are
  backwards ABI compatible they, and the elfutils tools, do depend on each
  others internals, and on internals of libelf to provide their interfaces.
  So they should always be upgraded in lockstep when packaging the tools
  and libraries separately. For one example of how to do that, see the
  config/elfutils.spec.
S
Description
暂无描述
Readme 23 MiB
Languages
C 70.8%
Shell 22.6%
C++ 3.3%
Makefile 1.4%
M4 1%
Other 0.8%