On ppc64le architecture __s64 is long int and requires %ld. Cast to
ssize_t and use %zd to avoid architecture-specific specifiers.
Fixes: 4172843ed4a3 ("libbpf: Fix signedness bug in btf_dump_array_data()")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209063909.1268319-1-andrii@kernel.org
Add syscall-specific variant of BPF_KPROBE named BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL ([0]).
The new macro hides the underlying way of getting syscall input arguments.
With the new macro, the following code:
SEC("kprobe/__x64_sys_close")
int BPF_KPROBE(do_sys_close, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int fd;
fd = PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE(regs);
/* do something with fd */
}
can be written as:
SEC("kprobe/__x64_sys_close")
int BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL(do_sys_close, int fd)
{
/* do something with fd */
}
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/425
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220207143134.2977852-2-hengqi.chen@gmail.com
On s390, the first syscall argument should be accessed via orig_gpr2
(see arch/s390/include/asm/syscall.h). Currently gpr[2] is used
instead, leading to bpf_syscall_macro test failure.
orig_gpr2 cannot be added to user_pt_regs, since its layout is a part
of the ABI. Therefore provide access to it only through
PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() by using a struct pt_regs flavor.
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-11-iii@linux.ibm.com
On arm64, the first syscall argument should be accessed via orig_x0
(see arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h). Currently regs[0] is used
instead, leading to bpf_syscall_macro test failure.
orig_x0 cannot be added to struct user_pt_regs, since its layout is a
part of the ABI. Therefore provide access to it only through
PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL() by using a struct pt_regs flavor.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-10-iii@linux.ibm.com
riscv does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER, so its syscall
handlers take "unpacked" syscall arguments. Indicate this to libbpf
using PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS macro.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-7-iii@linux.ibm.com
riscv registers are accessed via struct user_regs_struct, not struct
pt_regs. The program counter member in this struct is called pc, not
epc. The frame pointer is called s0, not fp.
Fixes: 3cc31d794097 ("libbpf: Normalize PT_REGS_xxx() macro definitions")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-6-iii@linux.ibm.com
powerpc does not select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER, so its syscall
handlers take "unpacked" syscall arguments. Indicate this to libbpf
using PT_REGS_SYSCALL_REGS macro.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-5-iii@linux.ibm.com
Architectures that select ARCH_HAS_SYSCALL_WRAPPER pass a pointer to
struct pt_regs to syscall handlers, others unpack it into individual
function parameters. Introduce a macro to describe what a particular
arch does.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220209021745.2215452-3-iii@linux.ibm.com
The btf__resolve_size() function returns negative error codes so
"elem_size" must be signed for the error handling to work.
Fixes: 920d16af9b42 ("libbpf: BTF dumper support for typed data")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220208071552.GB10495@kili
libbpf_set_strict_mode() checks that the passed mode doesn't contain
extra bits for LIBBPF_STRICT_* flags that don't exist yet.
It makes it difficult for applications to disable some strict flags as
something like "LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS"
is rejected by this check and they have to use a rather complicated
formula to calculate it.[0]
One possibility is to change LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL to only contain the bits
of all existing LIBBPF_STRICT_* flags instead of 0xffffffff. However
it's not possible because the idea is that applications compiled against
older libbpf_legacy.h would still be opting into latest
LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL features.[1]
The other possibility is to remove that check so something like
"LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL & ~LIBBPF_STRICT_MAP_DEFINITIONS" is allowed. It's
what this commit does.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220204220435.301896-1-mauricio@kinvolk.io/
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaTWa9fELJLh+bxnOb0P1EMQmaRbJVG0L+nXZdy0b8G3Q@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 93b8952d223a ("libbpf: deprecate legacy BPF map definitions")
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vásquez <mauricio@kinvolk.io>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220207145052.124421-2-mauricio@kinvolk.io
