c9c4949c86 build(deps): bump zod from 4.4.3 to 4.6.6 (#17364)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The shared validators use zod to check API input, and the Runner
contracts check some of the same values again
> - zod below 4.6.6 has a high-severity memory issue
(GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5), so this bump is necessary
> - zod 4.6 also changes string `min`, `max`, and `length`: they now
count Unicode code points, not UTF-16 units
> - The Runner question parser and the goal readers still use JavaScript
string length, so emoji text can pass zod and then fail later
> - This pull request bumps zod and keeps the string-length bound on
those schemas
> - The benefit is that we get the security fix, and these inputs still
fail at validation

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5.

**What happened?**
With zod 4.6, three CI tests failed on this bump. Two showed an emoji
body that is over the agent commentary ceiling and that zod now accepts.
The third is the scheduler timeout described under Verification.

**Expected behavior**
A dependency bump does not widen an API limit. Text over the limit gets
a validation error.

**Impact**
Emoji text between the two bounds passed validation and failed later:
- A question set is created, and then each answer gets a 422. The
question stays pending and nobody can answer it. A schema and parser run
confirmed the mismatch. This was not run over HTTP.
- The Muse route returns a 500 because `parsePaperclipQuestionSet`
throws an error that is not an `HttpError`. This comes from reading the
code. It was not run.
- A Runner goal normalizes to null and replaces the stored goal, or it
is marked blocked. This comes from reading the code. It was not run.

## What Changed

- Bump zod to `^4.6.6`. The lockfile resolves 4.6.7. (Dependabot)
- Add `maxStringLength` to `packages/shared/src/validators/text.ts`. It
checks zod `max` and JavaScript string length.
- Use `maxStringLength` for the question-set text fields, the Runner
goal objective, and the agent commentary body.
- Add regression tests for the question-set bound and the goal objective
bound.
- Dependabot recreated the branch on current `master` (`@dependabot
recreate`) to resolve `pnpm-lock.yaml` conflicts. This happened twice.
The lockfile is Dependabot's. Each time, the two fix commits were
applied again without changes.

## Verification

- Compared zod 4.4.3, 4.6.5, 4.6.6, and 4.6.7 directly. The change to
`max` is in 4.6.5 or earlier, and 4.4.3 does not have it.
- Passed locally: `packages/shared` tests `agent-commentary`,
`validators/issue`, and `runner-goal`, plus `tsc --noEmit` in
`packages/shared`.
- Passed locally on the first fix commit: server
`agent-commentary.integration`, `agent-commentary-helper`, and
`openapi-routes`. The later commit changes these schemas again. CI
passed these tests at `b5e9dc7352`.
- Local testing was focused. GitHub CI is the full regression check. CI
passed at `b5e9dc7352`, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`.
- Greptile reviewed `b5e9dc7352`. The score is 5/5, with no inline
comments.
- After the recreate, the fix commits applied cleanly as `bad62c3ba5`
and `3294552e65` on Dependabot's `46789d1487`. Their diff is the same as
the diff Greptile reviewed. The lockfile still resolves zod 4.6.7. The
focused `packages/shared` tests (`validators/issue`, `runner-goal`) and
`tsc --noEmit` in `packages/shared` passed again locally. A second
`pnpm-lock.yaml` conflict came before CI finished at `3294552e65`.
- Second recreate: Dependabot ignored the first `@dependabot recreate`
(no reaction and no update job after 20 minutes). It acted on the second
command and pushed `83c328c15c`. The fix commits applied cleanly as
`dd3e87d93e` and `95b450048f`, with the same diff. The lockfile still
resolves zod 4.6.7. The same focused tests and `tsc --noEmit` passed
again locally. Greptile first scored `95b450048f` 4/5 with one P2: the
description did not explain the source changes. Greptile read
Dependabot's replacement description, which was live during that review.
The description was restored and the thread resolved. The new review
scored `95b450048f` 5/5 with no findings. CI failed at `95b450048f` in
two shards. Neither failure comes from the zod change:
- `server (9/12)`: `server/scripts/reporting-lock-policy.test.mjs` fails
with "Reporting lock changed; review the dependency correction before
install". #19283 added this test today. It requires the committed
`pnpm-lock.yaml` hash to match `tests/runner-e2e/report-lock.json`.
Every pull request that changes the lockfile fails it until the hashes
are renewed, for example #17172 and #17911.
- `workspaces-a (1/2)`:
`cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts` timed out waiting
for its child server. The same test failed the same way on two unrelated
branches in the same hour (runs 42115721271 and 42109846042). A rerun of
this shard at `95b450048f` passed. The rerun of `server (9/12)` failed
again on the reporting-lock test.
- #19356 fixed the reporting-lock gate for Dependabot lockfiles and
merged. A re-run reuses the old merge commit, so the empty commit
`482d76686e` starts a run against current `master`. `pnpm-lock.yaml` and
the reporting-lock proof on `master` did not change since this branch's
base.
- CI at `482d76686e`: `ci / policy` passed, and `server (9/12)` skipped
the reporting-lock test as #19356 intends. `e2e shard (6/8)` failed once
in `cloud-auth.spec.ts` ("apiResponse.json: Response has been disposed",
a Playwright race in a route handler). The same test passed at
`95b450048f` with the same code. A rerun passed. All checks pass,
including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`.
- Earlier failure: `issue-monitor-scheduler.test.ts` ("lets the board
check a scheduled monitor on an in_progress task") timed out in CI at
`d60b5f56d8`. It passed 5 of 5 local runs with the first fix. The cause
is unknown. The test waits 3 seconds for heartbeat runs to settle, so CI
load is possible, but this is not proven. The test passed in the CI run
at `b5e9dc7352`. This shows recovery. It does not explain the earlier
timeout.

## Risks

- All other zod string bounds now count code points. Emoji text can be
up to 2N UTF-16 units and 4N UTF-8 bytes (it was N units and at most 3N
bytes). This pull request does not change those bounds.
- An audit of those bounds found no other concrete failure. It checked
index limits, byte limits, `.length` guards, provider limits, and
security `min` checks. It used code search and sampling, so it is not
exhaustive.
- Not verified: Slack `topic` and `purpose` use `.max(250)`, and we did
not confirm how Slack counts that limit.
- `.min(N)` is now stricter for emoji text. A single emoji no longer
passes `.min(2)`.
- `@dependabot rebase` or `@dependabot recreate` on this branch will
remove the manual commits. This happened twice to resolve lockfile
conflicts, and the commits were applied again each time.

## Model Used

- Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code
execution, in Claude Code.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused tests only; see
Verification)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
documentation change needed)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (at `482d76686e`)
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
(5/5 at `95b450048f`)
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---

Bumps [zod](https://github.com/colinhacks/zod) from 4.4.3 to 4.6.6.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases">zod's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v4.6.6</h2>
<blockquote>
<p>Six malicious commits pushed to <code>main</code> on September 21
with a compromised git credential were reverted the same day in <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6620">#6620</a>
and have since been removed from the history of <code>main</code>. None
were ever published to npm. The npm provenance for 4.6.6 names 284243fb,
the pre-rewrite copy of 9c219833 with identical contents.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>Commits:</h2>
<ul>
<li>0cd3af5e9f50ad11bbcd4407a46a21b8848ba574 docs: load the en locale
directly in Zod Mini</li>
<li>9d5e60f162997b764b40d45aa02481888db50dea docs: import locales from
zod/locales, not z.locales</li>
<li>34a626f307871ecbb0123947559328dc52ed5e3e docs: tighten the z.locales
tree-shaking note</li>
<li>74304ce5b5796b5edb9a88ceb8e170b6ea3e82df release: stage npm versions
instead of publishing them (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6622">#6622</a>)</li>
<li>b2ef983e0711ff6517d6020b021071e2e5653efa docs: add Code for Japan to
bronze sponsors</li>
<li>8fb2faf0584828a6a027d8279db36f6f52784462 docs: crop the Code for
Japan logo and list it first in bronze</li>
<li>bacad518c41610d654658172d325874bf0ee6290 docs: square the Code for
Japan logo to match the other bronze tiles</li>
<li>c42596bd1c87e941d7241d10e012c5c196adcc10 release: hold the run on
the release-approval environment until the staged versions are approved
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6638">#6638</a>)</li>
<li>a2ba4a67986a3e6b2b131be30084a2f460d9ea67 fix(types): declare record
output and input as members, not base type arguments (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6645">#6645</a>)</li>
<li>a0ebf970f2d752e5f58527cd2942ff48be4f46bd fix(v4): check array, set
and map size bounds before parsing elements (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6652">#6652</a>)</li>
<li>529f78dd9431b07f49647fee3aa0819b3f8b66b7 4.6.6</li>
<li>9c219833c3a3764fa1f1ea9c5ecec8254a63c0b1 ci: stage at verbose so a
failed OIDC token exchange says why</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.6.5</h2>
<h2>Commits:</h2>
<ul>
<li>d2b135cfb7a3582b9eb515756b9166bcb9521f4a docs: add the 4.6.x patch
highlights to the 4.6 post</li>
<li>f1448f7cee00df9fe1e9ad84a000aa1828cc8bc1 docs: fold the 4.6.x patch
highlights into the 4.6 post's own sections</li>
<li>de65a5cb39ed22a507fac935788f718fa88d104f docs: lead the properties
section with the check and add a Zod Mini tab (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6598">#6598</a>)</li>
<li>56222cd1532c07bcb91b67df529cab4c0a215330 feat(instanceof): key the
.properties() shape off the instance type (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6600">#6600</a>)</li>
<li>ca0229a404818290e6cdcfefcd7eb2d04bcbb543 Revert &quot;feat: add
z.currencyCode() over a vendored ISO 4217 list, refreshed weekly by CI
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6595">#6595</a>)&quot;</li>
<li>cc4cd4ee9c52fcaa10964e48cc144541e41a5ed9 Revert &quot;Revert
&quot;feat: add z.currencyCode() over a vendored ISO 4217 list,
refreshed weekly by CI (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6595">#6595</a>)&quot;&quot;</li>
<li>0f3f5ee3ca56c7574bf849e54f79e9a6e02562ee 4.6.5</li>
<li>59bbc03e10c636b9eb3c393dfeb552819774ec21 chore: re-pin the
integration peers to the workspace zod after the 4.6.5 bump</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.6.4</h2>
<p>A patch on top of <a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.3">4.6.3</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/d6bc1e30"><code>d6bc1e30</code></a>
feat: add <code>z.currencyCode()</code> over a vendored ISO 4217 list,
refreshed weekly by CI (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6595">#6595</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/ad32d751"><code>ad32d751</code></a>
perf: <code>z.url()</code> rejects an invalid URL with
<code>URL.canParse()</code> instead of a throwing constructor, about 50x
faster; fewer allocations on the validation path (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6588">#6588</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/2bb08717"><code>2bb08717</code></a>
chore: re-pin the integration peers to the workspace zod after the 4.6.4
bump</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/f6e1701a"><code>f6e1701a</code></a>
chore(deps): bump next to 15.5.25 and vite to 7.3.6 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6153">#6153</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.6.3</h2>
<p>A patch on top of <a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.2">4.6.2</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/413cce9a"><code>413cce9a</code></a>
fix(v4): make z.properties() a check again (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6594">#6594</a>) —
removes the standalone <code>z.properties()</code> schema from 4.6.0;
<code>z.instanceof().properties()</code> and
<code>.check(...z.properties())</code> are unchanged</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/75d63ee1"><code>75d63ee1</code></a>
docs: show only the <code>.properties()</code> method form in the 4.6
post</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/46da9572"><code>46da9572</code></a>
docs: match the error-message examples to what the parsers emit</li>
</ul>
<h2>v4.6.2</h2>
<p>A patch on top of <a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.1">4.6.1</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/9446b5cc"><code>9446b5cc</code></a>
fix: preserve undefined prefault outputs and object keys (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6587">#6587</a>) —
closes <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6585">#6585</a></li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/0c483c58"><code>0c483c58</code></a>
docs: the <a href="https://zod.dev/blog/zod-4-6">Zod 4.6 announcement
post</a> (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6546">#6546</a>)</li>
</ul>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/9c219833c3a3764fa1f1ea9c5ecec8254a63c0b1"><code>9c21983</code></a>
ci: stage at verbose so a failed OIDC token exchange says why</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/529f78dd9431b07f49647fee3aa0819b3f8b66b7"><code>529f78d</code></a>
4.6.6</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/a0ebf970f2d752e5f58527cd2942ff48be4f46bd"><code>a0ebf97</code></a>
fix(v4): check array, set and map size bounds before parsing elements
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6652">#6652</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/a2ba4a67986a3e6b2b131be30084a2f460d9ea67"><code>a2ba4a6</code></a>
fix(types): declare record output and input as members, not base type
argumen...</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/c42596bd1c87e941d7241d10e012c5c196adcc10"><code>c42596b</code></a>
release: hold the run on the release-approval environment until the
staged ve...</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/bacad518c41610d654658172d325874bf0ee6290"><code>bacad51</code></a>
docs: square the Code for Japan logo to match the other bronze
tiles</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/8fb2faf0584828a6a027d8279db36f6f52784462"><code>8fb2faf</code></a>
docs: crop the Code for Japan logo and list it first in bronze</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/b2ef983e0711ff6517d6020b021071e2e5653efa"><code>b2ef983</code></a>
docs: add Code for Japan to bronze sponsors</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/74304ce5b5796b5edb9a88ceb8e170b6ea3e82df"><code>74304ce</code></a>
release: stage npm versions instead of publishing them (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6622">#6622</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/34a626f307871ecbb0123947559328dc52ed5e3e"><code>34a626f</code></a>
docs: tighten the z.locales tree-shaking note</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/compare/v4.4.3...v4.6.6">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicky Leach <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
2026-11-05 17:41:43 -08:00
2026-03-07 02:57:28 +09:00

Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website

MIT License Stars Discord Security posture verified by Superagent

Star History Rank


Sign up for the Paperclip Cloud waitlist →


Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.

If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard. Choose models and harnesses per agent while keeping your team's tasks, skills, permissions, and history in one place.

It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.

Manage business goals, not pull requests.

Step Example
01 Define the goal "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR."
02 Hire the team CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider.
03 Approve and run Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard.

Works
with
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
Claude Code
Claude Code
Codex
Codex
Cursor and Cursor Cloud
Cursor
+ Cloud
Gemini CLI
Gemini CLI
OpenCode
OpenCode
Pi
Pi
Hermes and Hermes Gateway
Hermes
+ Gateway
Grok Build
Grok Build
Kimi Code
Kimi Code

If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Custom processes, HTTP endpoints, and external adapter packages extend the roster. See the adapter overview for setup and capabilities.


Paperclip is right for you if

  • ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
  • ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
  • ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
  • ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
  • ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
  • ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
  • ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone

The four pillars

Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.

The four pillars of Paperclip
Pillar Built for What it covers
Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. Everyone, daily Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests
Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. Managers Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries · connection permissions & responsible-user identities
Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. Enablers Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents · saved test inputs · skill version history & restore · reusable team templates
Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. IT & platform Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value · personal & shared app connections · run history & opt-in tracing

Features

🔌 Bring Your Own Agent

Any agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

🎯 Goal Alignment

Link tasks and projects to your organization goals. Agents receive the goal context behind their work.

💓 Heartbeats

Agents wake for assigned work, follow-up messages, or configured schedules. Delegation flows up and down the org chart.

💰 Cost Control

Company, agent, and project budgets. Track reported spend, get threshold alerts, and pause work at configured limits.

🏢 Multi-Organization

One deployment, many organizations. Separate tasks, agents, permissions, and activity histories for each.

🎫 Task Threads

Keep conversations, plans, blockers, files, and run history attached to the work. Assign tasks to agents or people.

🛡️ Governance

Configure review and approval stages, approve hires, and pause, reassign, or stop work when needed.

📊 Org Chart

Hierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description.

📱 Mobile Ready

Monitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere.

🔗 Apps & Connections

Connect services such as GitHub, Notion, and Railway, or your own MCP server. Set gateway actions to Allowed, Ask first, or Off.

👥 Shared Agents, Personal Accounts

Choose who can use a connection and which agents can access it. Managed GitHub operations can use the account of the person directing the work.

🧠 Skills & Skill Studio

Install or write shared skills, test them with saved inputs, inspect results, and restore earlier versions.

📅 Scheduled Routines

Run recurring work on a schedule or trigger it through an API or webhook. Each run has a task, an owner, and a history.

📎 Artifacts & Feedback

Find the files and documents agents produce. Preview supported formats and leave comments on specific passages in documents.

📦 Ready-Made Teams

Preview and install teams with roles, skills, projects, and routines. Choose their runtimes and make the setup your own.

Experimental Agent Chat and chat/email connectors add conversations with agents in Paperclip and through configured services such as Slack, Discord, Telegram, and AgentMail. Enable the relevant instance settings to try them.


Problems Paperclip solves

Without Paperclip With Paperclip
❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots.
❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why.
❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts.
❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. ✅ Spend tracking, budget alerts, and automatic pauses help you control the cost of ongoing work.
❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. ✅ Routines create assigned tasks on a schedule, with outputs and run history you can inspect.
❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work.

Why Paperclip is special

Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.

Atomic task checkout. A single assignee and execution locks prevent competing runs from claiming the same task.
Persistent work context. Tasks, comments, and documents stay in Paperclip. Supporting adapters resume saved sessions across runs.
Runtime skill injection. Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining.
Governance with rollback. Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely.
Accountable connections. Human access, agent eligibility, and gateway action permissions are separate controls. Approve a call once or save a revocable rule.
Goal-aware execution. Linked tasks and projects carry goal ancestry so agents see the "why," not just a title.
Portable company templates. Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling.
Organization boundaries. Company-scoped access checks keep each organization's work, agents, and activity separate within one deployment.

What's Under the Hood

Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       PAPERCLIP SERVER                       │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │Identity & │  │  Work &   │  │ Heartbeat │  │Governance │  │
│  │  Access   │  │   Tasks   │  │ Execution │  │& Approvals│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Org Chart │  │Workspaces │  │  Plugins  │  │  Budget   │  │
│  │ & Agents  │  │ & Runtime │  │           │  │ & Costs   │  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Routines  │  │ Secrets & │  │ Activity  │  │  Company  │  │
│  │& Schedules│  │  Storage  │  │ & Events  │  │Portability│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
         ▲              ▲              ▲              ▲
   ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐
   │  Claude   │  │   Codex   │  │   CLI     │  │ HTTP/web  │
   │   Code    │  │           │  │  agents   │  │   bots    │
   └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘

The Systems

Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), human roles and permissions, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, and invite flows. Responsible-user attribution follows work through delegation and supported managed connections.

Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. Search across work, review document revisions, and leave anchored feedback.

Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce logs, usage records, and adapter-specific session state. Bounded recovery handles supported failures and surfaces cases that need human action.

Workspaces & Runtime — Project repositories and workspaces, optional isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Sandbox providers extend execution beyond the local host; availability depends on the configured environment and adapter.

Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, and agent pause/resume/terminate. Configured task reviews govern completion; connection action approvals govern calls through the tool gateway.

Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Enforcement uses recorded spend; usage reporting and in-flight work can delay a stop.

Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed.

Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it.

Secrets & Storage — Company secrets and per-person secret values, encrypted credential storage, local or S3-compatible file storage, attachments, and work products. Secret references supply credentials to authorized runs without copying values into ordinary agent configuration.

Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why.

Company Portability — Preview, export, and import organization packages with agents, skills, and optional projects, routines, tasks, and attachments. Referenced secret values are omitted; review packages before sharing because plain environment values and local paths can remain. Packages share an operating setup; full-instance recovery uses backups.


What Paperclip is not

Not just a chatbot. Conversations stay attached to tasks, plans, decisions, and outputs. Experimental Agent Chat can hand work off to assigned tasks.
Not an agent framework. We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them.
Not just a workflow builder. Routines operate within an organization, with roles, goals, budgets, and governance.
Not a prompt manager. Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in.
Not limited to one agent. Start with one agent and grow into a team with shared skills, delegation, and review.
Not only for code review. Coding and PR review fit alongside research, operations, content, and other work.

Quickstart

Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required. Follow the guided quickstart to set up your first agent.

Just ask your agent to install Paperclip

Share the installation guide with your agent.

Or install it yourself

With Node.js 24.11 or newer installed:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

The CLI runs from npm's cache; your instance configuration and data persist locally.

See the installation guide for managed installs, pinned versions, canary and git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.

For an isolated manual test instance that is already initialized with a CEO agent, use test-drive. It stays in the foreground, never installs a service or creates a first task, and opens the browser only after setup succeeds:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive
OPENAI_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive --harness codex
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive \
  --harness opencode \
  --model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Each run without --data-dir gets a unique, retained temporary directory; its absolute path is printed at startup. Pass --data-dir to reuse one, or --no-browser to leave the initialized instance unopened. When invoked from a linked Git worktree, test-drive also enables task execution in that worktree. See the test-drive guide for credential and reuse behavior.

Troubleshooting: private npm registry .npmrc

If this fails with an E404 for paperclipai (or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global ~/.npmrc, npx may be resolving paperclipai against that private registry instead of the public npm registry.

Diagnostic:

npm config get registry

Workaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):

npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind tailnet

If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use npx paperclipai configure to edit settings.

Or manually:

git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev

This starts the UI and API at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.

Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+

Local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in also needs Python 3 and the corresponding provider CLI on the Paperclip host. The Docker image includes them.

Source development also builds the native Paperclip Runner when enabled (the self-hosted default). Install a Rust toolchain, or set PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_BINARY to a compatible prebuilt runner.


FAQ

Q: Is this project maintained or just slop?

A: Paperclip is maintained by the Paperclip team. We've merged over 2,700 pull requests.


Q: What does a typical setup look like?

A: Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.

For remote access, use authenticated mode with a private-network bind such as Tailscale, or deploy the persistent server with Docker. See deployment modes and the Docker guide.


Q: Can I run multiple companies?

A: Yes. A single deployment can host multiple organizations with company-scoped data and access checks.


Q: How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code?

A: Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.


Q: Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello?

A: Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.

(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)


Q: Do agents run continuously?

A: Agents wake for assigned work and follow-up messages. Optional timer heartbeats let them check for work periodically; routines create recurring tasks on their own schedules. You can also connect externally running agents such as OpenClaw. A mention alone does not assign work or wake another agent.


Development

pnpm dev              # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once         # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server       # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile       # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both         # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build            # Build all
pnpm typecheck        # Type checking
pnpm test             # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch       # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e         # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate      # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate       # Apply migrations

pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.

See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.


Roadmap

  • ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
  • ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
  • ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
  • ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
  • ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
  • ✅ Scheduled Routines
  • ✅ Better Budgeting
  • ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
  • ✅ Multiple Human Users
  • ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, boxd, self-hosted Kubernetes)
  • ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
  • ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
  • ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
  • ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
  • ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
  • ✅ Activity log & action attribution
  • ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
  • ✅ Agent evals & feedback
  • ✅ Connected Apps
  • ✅ Personal & Shared AI Accounts
  • ✅ Shared Agents Use Personal GitHub Identities
  • ✅ Skill Version History & Restore
  • ✅ Document Comments & Revision History
  • ✅ Company-Wide Search
  • ✅ Multi-Model & Multi-Harness Teams
  • 🟡 Memory / Knowledge
  • ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
  • ⚪ Work Queues
  • ⚪ Self-Organization
  • ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
  • 🟡 Agent Chat
  • 🟡 Cloud deployments
  • ⚪ Desktop App
  • ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)

This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.


Community & Plugins

Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip

Observability

Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.

Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND to activate it for the browser and SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND to activate it for the server — each variable is optional, and the legacy SENTRY_DSN variable still works as a fallback for either component. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/[email protected]; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.

Telemetry

Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.

Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.

Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:

Method How
Environment variable PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1
Standard convention DO_NOT_TRACK=1
CI environments Automatically disabled when CI=true
Config file Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config

Contributing

We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.

We're hiring


Community


License

MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc

Star History

Star History Chart

Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.

v2026.1106.0
Latest
2026-11-07 06:06:06 -10:00
Languages
TypeScript 91.9%
JavaScript 4.1%
Rust 2.8%
Python 0.4%
CSS 0.3%
Other 0.3%