mirror of
https://github.com/xenia-project/snappy.git
synced 2026-01-31 01:25:21 +01:00
27a0cc394950ebdad2e8d67322f0862835b10bd9
while being effectively performance neutral. The longer story about density is that we win 3-6% density on the benchmarks where this has any effect at all; many of the benchmarks (cp, c, lsp, man) are smaller than 32 kB and thus will have no effect. Binary data also seems to win little or nothing; of course, the already-compressed data wins nothing. The protobuf benchmark wins as much as ~18% depending on architecture, but I wouldn't be too sure that this is representative of protobuf data in general. As of performance, we lose a tiny amount since we get more tags (e.g., a long literal might be broken up into literal-copy-literal), but we win it back with less clearing of the hash table, and more opportunities to skip incompressible data (e.g. in the jpg benchmark). Decompression seems to get ever so slightly slower, again due to more tags. The total net change is about as close to zero as we can get, so the end effect seems to be simply more density and no real performance change. The comment about not changing kBlockSize, scary as it is, is not really relevant, since we're never going to have a block-level decompressor without explicitly marked blocks. Replace it with something more appropriate. This affects the framing format, but it's okay to change it since it basically has no users yet. Density (note that cp, c, lsp and man are all smaller than 32 kB): Benchmark Description Base (%) New (%) Improvement -------------------------------------------------------------- ZFlat/0 html 22.57 22.31 +5.6% ZFlat/1 urls 50.89 47.77 +6.5% ZFlat/2 jpg 99.88 99.87 +0.0% ZFlat/3 pdf 82.13 82.07 +0.1% ZFlat/4 html4 23.55 22.51 +4.6% ZFlat/5 cp 48.12 48.12 +0.0% ZFlat/6 c 42.40 42.40 +0.0% ZFlat/7 lsp 48.37 48.37 +0.0% ZFlat/8 xls 41.34 41.23 +0.3% ZFlat/9 txt1 59.81 57.87 +3.4% ZFlat/10 txt2 64.07 61.93 +3.5% ZFlat/11 txt3 57.11 54.92 +4.0% ZFlat/12 txt4 68.35 66.22 +3.2% ZFlat/13 bin 18.21 18.11 +0.6% ZFlat/14 sum 51.88 48.96 +6.0% ZFlat/15 man 59.36 59.36 +0.0% ZFlat/16 pb 23.15 19.64 +17.9% ZFlat/17 gaviota 38.27 37.72 +1.5% Geometric mean 45.51 44.15 +3.1% Microbenchmarks (64-bit, opt): Westmere 2.8 GHz: Benchmark Base (ns) New (ns) Improvement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BM_UFlat/0 75342 75027 1.3GB/s html +0.4% BM_UFlat/1 723767 744269 899.6MB/s urls -2.8% BM_UFlat/2 10072 10072 11.7GB/s jpg +0.0% BM_UFlat/3 30747 30388 2.9GB/s pdf +1.2% BM_UFlat/4 307353 306063 1.2GB/s html4 +0.4% BM_UFlat/5 28593 28743 816.3MB/s cp -0.5% BM_UFlat/6 12958 12998 818.1MB/s c -0.3% BM_UFlat/7 3700 3792 935.8MB/s lsp -2.4% BM_UFlat/8 999685 999905 982.1MB/s xls -0.0% BM_UFlat/9 232954 230079 630.4MB/s txt1 +1.2% BM_UFlat/10 200785 201468 592.6MB/s txt2 -0.3% BM_UFlat/11 617267 610968 666.1MB/s txt3 +1.0% BM_UFlat/12 821595 822475 558.7MB/s txt4 -0.1% BM_UFlat/13 377097 377632 1.3GB/s bin -0.1% BM_UFlat/14 45476 45260 805.8MB/s sum +0.5% BM_UFlat/15 4985 5003 805.7MB/s man -0.4% BM_UFlat/16 80813 77494 1.4GB/s pb +4.3% BM_UFlat/17 251792 241553 727.7MB/s gaviota +4.2% BM_UValidate/0 40343 40354 2.4GB/s html -0.0% BM_UValidate/1 426890 451574 1.4GB/s urls -5.5% BM_UValidate/2 187 179 661.9GB/s jpg +4.5% BM_UValidate/3 13783 13827 6.4GB/s pdf -0.3% BM_UValidate/4 162393 163335 2.3GB/s html4 -0.6% BM_UDataBuffer/0 93756 93302 1046.7MB/s html +0.5% BM_UDataBuffer/1 886714 916292 730.7MB/s urls -3.2% BM_UDataBuffer/2 15861 16401 7.2GB/s jpg -3.3% BM_UDataBuffer/3 38934 39224 2.2GB/s pdf -0.7% BM_UDataBuffer/4 381008 379428 1029.5MB/s html4 +0.4% BM_UCord/0 92528 91098 1072.0MB/s html +1.6% BM_UCord/1 858421 885287 756.3MB/s urls -3.0% BM_UCord/2 13140 13464 8.8GB/s jpg -2.4% BM_UCord/3 39012 37773 2.3GB/s pdf +3.3% BM_UCord/4 376869 371267 1052.1MB/s html4 +1.5% BM_UCordString/0 75810 75303 1.3GB/s html +0.7% BM_UCordString/1 735290 753841 888.2MB/s urls -2.5% BM_UCordString/2 11945 13113 9.0GB/s jpg -8.9% BM_UCordString/3 33901 32562 2.7GB/s pdf +4.1% BM_UCordString/4 310985 309390 1.2GB/s html4 +0.5% BM_UCordValidate/0 40952 40450 2.4GB/s html +1.2% BM_UCordValidate/1 433842 456531 1.4GB/s urls -5.0% BM_UCordValidate/2 1179 1173 100.8GB/s jpg +0.5% BM_UCordValidate/3 14481 14392 6.1GB/s pdf +0.6% BM_UCordValidate/4 164364 164151 2.3GB/s html4 +0.1% BM_ZFlat/0 160610 156601 623.6MB/s html (22.31 %) +2.6% BM_ZFlat/1 1995238 1993582 335.9MB/s urls (47.77 %) +0.1% BM_ZFlat/2 30133 24983 4.7GB/s jpg (99.87 %) +20.6% BM_ZFlat/3 74453 73128 1.2GB/s pdf (82.07 %) +1.8% BM_ZFlat/4 647674 633729 616.4MB/s html4 (22.51 %) +2.2% BM_ZFlat/5 76259 76090 308.4MB/s cp (48.12 %) +0.2% BM_ZFlat/6 31106 31084 342.1MB/s c (42.40 %) +0.1% BM_ZFlat/7 10507 10443 339.8MB/s lsp (48.37 %) +0.6% BM_ZFlat/8 1811047 1793325 547.6MB/s xls (41.23 %) +1.0% BM_ZFlat/9 597903 581793 249.3MB/s txt1 (57.87 %) +2.8% BM_ZFlat/10 525320 514522 232.0MB/s txt2 (61.93 %) +2.1% BM_ZFlat/11 1596591 1551636 262.3MB/s txt3 (54.92 %) +2.9% BM_ZFlat/12 2134523 2094033 219.5MB/s txt4 (66.22 %) +1.9% BM_ZFlat/13 593024 587869 832.6MB/s bin (18.11 %) +0.9% BM_ZFlat/14 114746 110666 329.5MB/s sum (48.96 %) +3.7% BM_ZFlat/15 14376 14485 278.3MB/s man (59.36 %) -0.8% BM_ZFlat/16 167908 150070 753.6MB/s pb (19.64 %) +11.9% BM_ZFlat/17 460228 442253 397.5MB/s gaviota (37.72 %) +4.1% BM_ZCord/0 164896 160241 609.4MB/s html +2.9% BM_ZCord/1 2070239 2043492 327.7MB/s urls +1.3% BM_ZCord/2 54402 47002 2.5GB/s jpg +15.7% BM_ZCord/3 85871 83832 1073.1MB/s pdf +2.4% BM_ZCord/4 664078 648825 602.0MB/s html4 +2.4% BM_ZDataBuffer/0 174874 172549 566.0MB/s html +1.3% BM_ZDataBuffer/1 2134410 2139173 313.0MB/s urls -0.2% BM_ZDataBuffer/2 71911 69551 1.7GB/s jpg +3.4% BM_ZDataBuffer/3 98236 99727 902.1MB/s pdf -1.5% BM_ZDataBuffer/4 710776 699104 558.8MB/s html4 +1.7% Sum of all benchmarks 27358908 27200688 +0.6% Sandy Bridge 2.6 GHz: Benchmark Base (ns) New (ns) Improvement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BM_UFlat/0 49356 49018 1.9GB/s html +0.7% BM_UFlat/1 516764 531955 1.2GB/s urls -2.9% BM_UFlat/2 6982 7304 16.2GB/s jpg -4.4% BM_UFlat/3 15285 15598 5.6GB/s pdf -2.0% BM_UFlat/4 206557 206669 1.8GB/s html4 -0.1% BM_UFlat/5 13681 13567 1.7GB/s cp +0.8% BM_UFlat/6 6571 6592 1.6GB/s c -0.3% BM_UFlat/7 2008 1994 1.7GB/s lsp +0.7% BM_UFlat/8 775700 773286 1.2GB/s xls +0.3% BM_UFlat/9 165578 164480 881.8MB/s txt1 +0.7% BM_UFlat/10 143707 144139 828.2MB/s txt2 -0.3% BM_UFlat/11 443026 436281 932.8MB/s txt3 +1.5% BM_UFlat/12 603129 595856 771.2MB/s txt4 +1.2% BM_UFlat/13 271682 270450 1.8GB/s bin +0.5% BM_UFlat/14 26200 25666 1.4GB/s sum +2.1% BM_UFlat/15 2620 2608 1.5GB/s man +0.5% BM_UFlat/16 48908 47756 2.3GB/s pb +2.4% BM_UFlat/17 174638 170346 1031.9MB/s gaviota +2.5% BM_UValidate/0 31922 31898 3.0GB/s html +0.1% BM_UValidate/1 341265 363554 1.8GB/s urls -6.1% BM_UValidate/2 160 151 782.8GB/s jpg +6.0% BM_UValidate/3 10402 10380 8.5GB/s pdf +0.2% BM_UValidate/4 129490 130587 2.9GB/s html4 -0.8% BM_UDataBuffer/0 59383 58736 1.6GB/s html +1.1% BM_UDataBuffer/1 619222 637786 1049.8MB/s urls -2.9% BM_UDataBuffer/2 10775 11941 9.9GB/s jpg -9.8% BM_UDataBuffer/3 18002 17930 4.9GB/s pdf +0.4% BM_UDataBuffer/4 259182 259306 1.5GB/s html4 -0.0% BM_UCord/0 59379 57814 1.6GB/s html +2.7% BM_UCord/1 598456 615162 1088.4MB/s urls -2.7% BM_UCord/2 8519 8628 13.7GB/s jpg -1.3% BM_UCord/3 18123 17537 5.0GB/s pdf +3.3% BM_UCord/4 252375 252331 1.5GB/s html4 +0.0% BM_UCordString/0 49494 49790 1.9GB/s html -0.6% BM_UCordString/1 524659 541803 1.2GB/s urls -3.2% BM_UCordString/2 8206 8354 14.2GB/s jpg -1.8% BM_UCordString/3 17235 16537 5.3GB/s pdf +4.2% BM_UCordString/4 210188 211072 1.8GB/s html4 -0.4% BM_UCordValidate/0 31956 31587 3.0GB/s html +1.2% BM_UCordValidate/1 340828 362141 1.8GB/s urls -5.9% BM_UCordValidate/2 783 744 158.9GB/s jpg +5.2% BM_UCordValidate/3 10543 10462 8.4GB/s pdf +0.8% BM_UCordValidate/4 130150 129789 2.9GB/s html4 +0.3% BM_ZFlat/0 113873 111200 878.2MB/s html (22.31 %) +2.4% BM_ZFlat/1 1473023 1489858 449.4MB/s urls (47.77 %) -1.1% BM_ZFlat/2 23569 19486 6.1GB/s jpg (99.87 %) +21.0% BM_ZFlat/3 49178 48046 1.8GB/s pdf (82.07 %) +2.4% BM_ZFlat/4 475063 469394 832.2MB/s html4 (22.51 %) +1.2% BM_ZFlat/5 46910 46816 501.2MB/s cp (48.12 %) +0.2% BM_ZFlat/6 16883 16916 628.6MB/s c (42.40 %) -0.2% BM_ZFlat/7 5381 5447 651.5MB/s lsp (48.37 %) -1.2% BM_ZFlat/8 1466870 1473861 666.3MB/s xls (41.23 %) -0.5% BM_ZFlat/9 468006 464101 312.5MB/s txt1 (57.87 %) +0.8% BM_ZFlat/10 408157 408957 291.9MB/s txt2 (61.93 %) -0.2% BM_ZFlat/11 1253348 1232910 330.1MB/s txt3 (54.92 %) +1.7% BM_ZFlat/12 1702373 1702977 269.8MB/s txt4 (66.22 %) -0.0% BM_ZFlat/13 439792 438557 1116.0MB/s bin (18.11 %) +0.3% BM_ZFlat/14 80766 78851 462.5MB/s sum (48.96 %) +2.4% BM_ZFlat/15 7420 7542 534.5MB/s man (59.36 %) -1.6% BM_ZFlat/16 112043 100126 1.1GB/s pb (19.64 %) +11.9% BM_ZFlat/17 368877 357703 491.4MB/s gaviota (37.72 %) +3.1% BM_ZCord/0 116402 113564 859.9MB/s html +2.5% BM_ZCord/1 1507156 1519911 440.5MB/s urls -0.8% BM_ZCord/2 39860 33686 3.5GB/s jpg +18.3% BM_ZCord/3 56211 54694 1.6GB/s pdf +2.8% BM_ZCord/4 485594 479212 815.1MB/s html4 +1.3% BM_ZDataBuffer/0 123185 121572 803.3MB/s html +1.3% BM_ZDataBuffer/1 1569111 1589380 421.3MB/s urls -1.3% BM_ZDataBuffer/2 53143 49556 2.4GB/s jpg +7.2% BM_ZDataBuffer/3 65725 66826 1.3GB/s pdf -1.6% BM_ZDataBuffer/4 517871 514750 758.9MB/s html4 +0.6% Sum of all benchmarks 20258879 20315484 -0.3% AMD Instanbul 2.4 GHz: Benchmark Base (ns) New (ns) Improvement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BM_UFlat/0 97120 96585 1011.1MB/s html +0.6% BM_UFlat/1 917473 948016 706.3MB/s urls -3.2% BM_UFlat/2 21496 23938 4.9GB/s jpg -10.2% BM_UFlat/3 44751 45639 1.9GB/s pdf -1.9% BM_UFlat/4 391950 391413 998.0MB/s html4 +0.1% BM_UFlat/5 37366 37201 630.7MB/s cp +0.4% BM_UFlat/6 18350 18318 580.5MB/s c +0.2% BM_UFlat/7 5672 5661 626.9MB/s lsp +0.2% BM_UFlat/8 1533390 1529441 642.1MB/s xls +0.3% BM_UFlat/9 335477 336553 431.0MB/s txt1 -0.3% BM_UFlat/10 285140 292080 408.7MB/s txt2 -2.4% BM_UFlat/11 888507 894758 454.9MB/s txt3 -0.7% BM_UFlat/12 1187643 1210928 379.5MB/s txt4 -1.9% BM_UFlat/13 493717 507447 964.5MB/s bin -2.7% BM_UFlat/14 61740 60870 599.1MB/s sum +1.4% BM_UFlat/15 7211 7187 560.9MB/s man +0.3% BM_UFlat/16 97435 93100 1.2GB/s pb +4.7% BM_UFlat/17 362662 356395 493.2MB/s gaviota +1.8% BM_UValidate/0 47475 47118 2.0GB/s html +0.8% BM_UValidate/1 501304 529741 1.2GB/s urls -5.4% BM_UValidate/2 276 243 486.2GB/s jpg +13.6% BM_UValidate/3 16361 16261 5.4GB/s pdf +0.6% BM_UValidate/4 190741 190353 2.0GB/s html4 +0.2% BM_UDataBuffer/0 111080 109771 889.6MB/s html +1.2% BM_UDataBuffer/1 1051035 1085999 616.5MB/s urls -3.2% BM_UDataBuffer/2 25801 25463 4.6GB/s jpg +1.3% BM_UDataBuffer/3 50493 49946 1.8GB/s pdf +1.1% BM_UDataBuffer/4 447258 444138 879.5MB/s html4 +0.7% BM_UCord/0 109350 107909 905.0MB/s html +1.3% BM_UCord/1 1023396 1054964 634.7MB/s urls -3.0% BM_UCord/2 25292 24371 4.9GB/s jpg +3.8% BM_UCord/3 48955 49736 1.8GB/s pdf -1.6% BM_UCord/4 440452 437331 893.2MB/s html4 +0.7% BM_UCordString/0 98511 98031 996.2MB/s html +0.5% BM_UCordString/1 933230 963495 694.9MB/s urls -3.1% BM_UCordString/2 23311 24076 4.9GB/s jpg -3.2% BM_UCordString/3 45568 46196 1.9GB/s pdf -1.4% BM_UCordString/4 397791 396934 984.1MB/s html4 +0.2% BM_UCordValidate/0 47537 46921 2.0GB/s html +1.3% BM_UCordValidate/1 505071 532716 1.2GB/s urls -5.2% BM_UCordValidate/2 1663 1621 72.9GB/s jpg +2.6% BM_UCordValidate/3 16890 16926 5.2GB/s pdf -0.2% BM_UCordValidate/4 192365 191984 2.0GB/s html4 +0.2% BM_ZFlat/0 184708 179103 545.3MB/s html (22.31 %) +3.1% BM_ZFlat/1 2293864 2302950 290.7MB/s urls (47.77 %) -0.4% BM_ZFlat/2 52852 47618 2.5GB/s jpg (99.87 %) +11.0% BM_ZFlat/3 100766 96179 935.3MB/s pdf (82.07 %) +4.8% BM_ZFlat/4 741220 727977 536.6MB/s html4 (22.51 %) +1.8% BM_ZFlat/5 85402 85418 274.7MB/s cp (48.12 %) -0.0% BM_ZFlat/6 36558 36494 291.4MB/s c (42.40 %) +0.2% BM_ZFlat/7 12706 12507 283.7MB/s lsp (48.37 %) +1.6% BM_ZFlat/8 2336823 2335688 420.5MB/s xls (41.23 %) +0.0% BM_ZFlat/9 701804 681153 212.9MB/s txt1 (57.87 %) +3.0% BM_ZFlat/10 606700 597194 199.9MB/s txt2 (61.93 %) +1.6% BM_ZFlat/11 1852283 1803238 225.7MB/s txt3 (54.92 %) +2.7% BM_ZFlat/12 2475527 2443354 188.1MB/s txt4 (66.22 %) +1.3% BM_ZFlat/13 694497 696654 702.6MB/s bin (18.11 %) -0.3% BM_ZFlat/14 136929 129855 280.8MB/s sum (48.96 %) +5.4% BM_ZFlat/15 17172 17124 235.4MB/s man (59.36 %) +0.3% BM_ZFlat/16 190364 171763 658.4MB/s pb (19.64 %) +10.8% BM_ZFlat/17 567285 555190 316.6MB/s gaviota (37.72 %) +2.2% BM_ZCord/0 193490 187031 522.1MB/s html +3.5% BM_ZCord/1 2427537 2415315 277.2MB/s urls +0.5% BM_ZCord/2 85378 81412 1.5GB/s jpg +4.9% BM_ZCord/3 121898 119419 753.3MB/s pdf +2.1% BM_ZCord/4 779564 762961 512.0MB/s html4 +2.2% BM_ZDataBuffer/0 213820 207272 471.1MB/s html +3.2% BM_ZDataBuffer/1 2589010 2586495 258.9MB/s urls +0.1% BM_ZDataBuffer/2 121871 118885 1018.4MB/s jpg +2.5% BM_ZDataBuffer/3 145382 145986 616.2MB/s pdf -0.4% BM_ZDataBuffer/4 868117 852754 458.1MB/s html4 +1.8% Sum of all benchmarks 33771833 33744763 +0.1% git-svn-id: https://snappy.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@71 03e5f5b5-db94-4691-08a0-1a8bf15f6143
Snappy, a fast compressor/decompressor. Introduction ============ Snappy is a compression/decompression library. It does not aim for maximum compression, or compatibility with any other compression library; instead, it aims for very high speeds and reasonable compression. For instance, compared to the fastest mode of zlib, Snappy is an order of magnitude faster for most inputs, but the resulting compressed files are anywhere from 20% to 100% bigger. (For more information, see "Performance", below.) Snappy has the following properties: * Fast: Compression speeds at 250 MB/sec and beyond, with no assembler code. See "Performance" below. * Stable: Over the last few years, Snappy has compressed and decompressed petabytes of data in Google's production environment. The Snappy bitstream format is stable and will not change between versions. * Robust: The Snappy decompressor is designed not to crash in the face of corrupted or malicious input. * Free and open source software: Snappy is licensed under a BSD-type license. For more information, see the included COPYING file. Snappy has previously been called "Zippy" in some Google presentations and the like. Performance =========== Snappy is intended to be fast. On a single core of a Core i7 processor in 64-bit mode, it compresses at about 250 MB/sec or more and decompresses at about 500 MB/sec or more. (These numbers are for the slowest inputs in our benchmark suite; others are much faster.) In our tests, Snappy usually is faster than algorithms in the same class (e.g. LZO, LZF, FastLZ, QuickLZ, etc.) while achieving comparable compression ratios. Typical compression ratios (based on the benchmark suite) are about 1.5-1.7x for plain text, about 2-4x for HTML, and of course 1.0x for JPEGs, PNGs and other already-compressed data. Similar numbers for zlib in its fastest mode are 2.6-2.8x, 3-7x and 1.0x, respectively. More sophisticated algorithms are capable of achieving yet higher compression rates, although usually at the expense of speed. Of course, compression ratio will vary significantly with the input. Although Snappy should be fairly portable, it is primarily optimized for 64-bit x86-compatible processors, and may run slower in other environments. In particular: - Snappy uses 64-bit operations in several places to process more data at once than would otherwise be possible. - Snappy assumes unaligned 32- and 64-bit loads and stores are cheap. On some platforms, these must be emulated with single-byte loads and stores, which is much slower. - Snappy assumes little-endian throughout, and needs to byte-swap data in several places if running on a big-endian platform. Experience has shown that even heavily tuned code can be improved. Performance optimizations, whether for 64-bit x86 or other platforms, are of course most welcome; see "Contact", below. Usage ===== Note that Snappy, both the implementation and the main interface, is written in C++. However, several third-party bindings to other languages are available; see the Google Code page at http://code.google.com/p/snappy/ for more information. Also, if you want to use Snappy from C code, you can use the included C bindings in snappy-c.h. To use Snappy from your own C++ program, include the file "snappy.h" from your calling file, and link against the compiled library. There are many ways to call Snappy, but the simplest possible is snappy::Compress(input.data(), input.size(), &output); and similarly snappy::Uncompress(input.data(), input.size(), &output); where "input" and "output" are both instances of std::string. There are other interfaces that are more flexible in various ways, including support for custom (non-array) input sources. See the header file for more information. Tests and benchmarks ==================== When you compile Snappy, snappy_unittest is compiled in addition to the library itself. You do not need it to use the compressor from your own library, but it contains several useful components for Snappy development. First of all, it contains unit tests, verifying correctness on your machine in various scenarios. If you want to change or optimize Snappy, please run the tests to verify you have not broken anything. Note that if you have the Google Test library installed, unit test behavior (especially failures) will be significantly more user-friendly. You can find Google Test at http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ You probably also want the gflags library for handling of command-line flags; you can find it at http://code.google.com/p/google-gflags/ In addition to the unit tests, snappy contains microbenchmarks used to tune compression and decompression performance. These are automatically run before the unit tests, but you can disable them using the flag --run_microbenchmarks=false if you have gflags installed (otherwise you will need to edit the source). Finally, snappy can benchmark Snappy against a few other compression libraries (zlib, LZO, LZF, FastLZ and QuickLZ), if they were detected at configure time. To benchmark using a given file, give the compression algorithm you want to test Snappy against (e.g. --zlib) and then a list of one or more file names on the command line. The testdata/ directory contains the files used by the microbenchmark, which should provide a reasonably balanced starting point for benchmarking. (Note that baddata[1-3].snappy are not intended as benchmarks; they are used to verify correctness in the presence of corrupted data in the unit test.) Contact ======= Snappy is distributed through Google Code. For the latest version, a bug tracker, and other information, see http://code.google.com/p/snappy/
Description
⚠️ ARCHIVED: Original GitHub repository no longer exists. Preserved as backup on 2026-01-31T05:36:49.290Z
Languages
C++
93.1%
M4
3.5%
C
2.7%
Makefile
0.6%