Our current OS X builds use `--target=x86_64-darwin11` (which
corresponds to OS X 10.7). This target is problematic for two reasons:
* We're actually targeting for OS X 10.9 (`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`);
* It's slightly different from the default Rust target.
Let's address these problems in reverse order: differences from the Rust
target are bad, because the `--target` we provide to `clang` and the
Rust target find their way into LLVM bitcode files and the linker will
refuse to link together bitcode files that have incompatible targets.
Why are the two incompatible? The current `--target` doesn't have a
"vendor" in triple-speak, whereas the Rust one has "apple" as the
vendor (`x86_64-apple-darwin`) We therefore need to change the
`--target` we pass to `clang` to have a vendor of "apple".
This need is behind the {init,toolchain}.configure changes,
but it has ramifications elsewhere, because `clang` looks for
`--target`-prefixed build tools. So we have to change the `--target`
for cctools to get the right tool prefixes and we have to change the
`--target` for building clang ourselves so that *those* builds can find
the newly renamed cctools.
Once we've done, that's really enough; we don't *need to address the
first problem: While the `--target` might be `x86_64-apple-darwin11`,
both `clang` and `rustc` will dynamically choose the target triple that
eventually lands in LLVM bitcode files based on
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, which we set in all builds. But the current
target is slightly misleading, and the cctools don't need to be prefixed
with a particular Darwin version, since they work for all Darwin
targets. Let's just drop the "11" from the `--target` and eliminate a
little bit of confusion.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Our current OS X builds use `--target=x86_64-darwin11` (which
corresponds to OS X 10.7). This target is problematic for two reasons:
* We're actually targeting for OS X 10.9 (`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`);
* It's slightly different from the default Rust target.
Let's address these problems in reverse order: differences from the Rust
target are bad, because the `--target` we provide to `clang` and the
Rust target find their way into LLVM bitcode files and the linker will
refuse to link together bitcode files that have incompatible targets.
Why are the two incompatible? The current `--target` doesn't have a
"vendor" in triple-speak, whereas the Rust one has "apple" as the
vendor (`x86_64-apple-darwin`) We therefore need to change the
`--target` we pass to `clang` to have a vendor of "apple".
This need is behind the {init,toolchain}.configure changes,
but it has ramifications elsewhere, because `clang` looks for
`--target`-prefixed build tools. So we have to change the `--target`
for cctools to get the right tool prefixes and we have to change the
`--target` for building clang ourselves so that *those* builds can find
the newly renamed cctools.
Once we've done, that's really enough; we don't *need to address the
first problem: While the `--target` might be `x86_64-apple-darwin11`,
both `clang` and `rustc` will dynamically choose the target triple that
eventually lands in LLVM bitcode files based on
`MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET`, which we set in all builds. But the current
target is slightly misleading, and the cctools don't need to be prefixed
with a particular Darwin version, since they work for all Darwin
targets. Let's just drop the "11" from the `--target` and eliminate a
little bit of confusion.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31128
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This will match the compiler version Tor would like. We backport several
llvm-objcopy patches that landed right after the 8 branch though. We
also grab some upstream changes from mingw-clang in the build script
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31347
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Analogously to the existing `linux64-clang-8-android-cross` build, this
build is a linux x86-64 build with runtime library support for aarch64.
Depends on D28405
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28406
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
This change enables us to build compiler-rt and related
libraries (e.g. address sanitizer, etc.) for whatever targets we like,
assuming that we have an accessible sysroot for the target on the build
machine.
Depends on D28404
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28405
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
CMake errors can be pretty opaque, especially if CMake is being run
inside the Ninja build process. Let's try to surface those errors to
make problems easier to debug.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D28360
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
It seems better to set switches enabling runtime libraries and switches
enabling runtime libraries to build in different places, as future
changes might only enable runtime libraries for certain targets, but not
need any special switches for building.
Depends on D27594
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27595
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
`android_targets` here is a dict, not a sequence, and while `iter` on a
dict object implicitly means `dict.iterkeys()`, that's not really
obvious. We should instead be explicit about what we're doing here.
Depends on D27593
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27594
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We don't need them and we might as well be explicit about not building them.
Depends on D27592
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27593
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
The setup for compiler-rt is currently done before the stage 2 build,
which happens to be the final stage for our android runtime libraries
build. But we may also want to build runtime libraries on 3-stage
bootstrap builds, in which case we don't want compiler-rt to be active
for the second stage. Move the setup into build_one_stage so that the
setup is controllable by is_final_stage, which is set in all the place
that we care about.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27592
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
As of clang 8, llvm-config doesn't return all flags clang was built
with, and omits some flags that do impact the libclang ABI,
-stdlib=libc++ being one of them (it might well be the only one).
Building clang with LLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX=ON does build it with
-stdlib=libc++, but is unrelated to whether or not libc++ is built and
shipped with clang, which still happens without it.
So while versions older than clang 8 are not really affected, it doesn't
hurt to build clang without -stdlib=libc++ (especially when it
currently only applies to the clang used to cross build android with
PGO, not even the other android cross builds), in preparation for
switching to clang 8.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D25031
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We do this to encourage clang to find an new-enough linker instead of
the system one.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22881
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We want our clang bootstrap to use the GCC headers we're building with,
not whatever sysroot it happens to find on the server we're building on.
The -gcc-toolchain argument we specify when building clang will also be
picked up by llvm-config, so we need to strip it out when building the
plugin. Otherwise, we will get peculiar failures about not being able to
find C++ header files.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22880
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
Updating clang indicates that 32-bit compilation is substantially longer
than 64-bit compilation, perhaps due to swapping. The compilation
process is hitting the timeout limit shortly before the compilation
process completes (~3681/3695 tasks according to ninja).
We could tweak our clang build process to accommodate this job. But we
don't support building on 32-bit Windows anymore, and we don't produce a
32-bit Windows clang either. So we shouldn't support a 32-bit Windows
clang-tidy job either. Let's get rid of it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23517
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We do this to encourage clang to find an new-enough linker instead of
the system one.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22881
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
We want our clang bootstrap to use the GCC headers we're building with,
not whatever sysroot it happens to find on the server we're building on.
The -gcc-toolchain argument we specify when building clang will also be
picked up by llvm-config, so we need to strip it out when building the
plugin. Otherwise, we will get peculiar failures about not being able to
find C++ header files.
Depends on D22879
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D22880
--HG--
extra : moz-landing-system : lando
