3333 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Corentin Jabot
6875ac6927 [clang] Remove an incorrect assert
Compound statements can appear in default arguments
but should not be visited in ImmediateCallVisitor as they are
not subexpressions
2022-11-04 15:46:22 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
5f87a892a7 [clang] Fix assert in SemaEXpr.cpp 2022-11-04 15:37:37 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
7acfe36294 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 14:46:38 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
722a0efe31 Revert "Implement CWG2631"
Breaks the build on some platforms.

This reverts commit bf1e235695a7acdc3e868217e69d5b31ada06cb3.
2022-11-04 08:24:52 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
bf1e235695 Implement CWG2631
Implement https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2631.html.

Immediate calls in default arguments and defaults members
are not evaluated.

Instead, we evaluate them when constructing a
`CXXDefaultArgExpr`/`BuildCXXDefaultInitExpr`.

The immediate calls are executed by doing a
transform on the initializing expression.

Note that lambdas are not considering subexpressions so
we do not need to transform them.

As a result of this patch, unused default member
initializers are not considered odr-used, and
errors about members binding to local variables
in an outer scope only surface at the point
where a constructor is defined.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136554
2022-11-04 07:58:57 +01:00
Xiang Li
464926ef44 [HLSL] Disable integer promotion to avoid int16_t being promoted to int for HLSL.
short will be promoted to int in UsualUnaryConversions.
Disable it for HLSL to keep int16_t as 16bit.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rjmccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133668
2022-10-20 16:06:25 -07:00
Erich Keane
4bcb85c638 Stop evaluating trailing requires clause after overload resolution
Reported as it showed up as a constriants failure after the deferred
instantiation patch, we were checking constraints TWICE after overload
resolution.  The first is during overload resolution, the second is when
diagnosing a use.

This patch modifies DiagnoseUseOfDecl to skip the trailing requires
clause check in some cases. First, of course, after choosing a candidate
after overload resolution.

The second is when evaluating a shadow using constructor, which had its
constraints checked when picking a constructor (as this is ALWAYS an
overload situation!).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135772
2022-10-18 06:08:10 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
3a31970ee2 [C2x] Implement support for nullptr and nullptr_t
This introduces support for nullptr and nullptr_t in C2x mode. The
proposal accepted by WG14 is:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3042.htm

Note, there are quite a few incompatibilities with the C++ feature in
some of the edge cases of this feature. Therefore, there are some FIXME
comments in tests for testing behavior that might change after WG14 has
resolved national body comments (a process we've not yet started). So
this implementation might change slightly depending on the resolution
of comments. This is called out explicitly in the release notes as
well.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135099
2022-10-14 10:06:02 -04:00
Erich Keane
6685e56ced Disallow dereferencing of void* in C++.
as Discussed:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-can-we-stop-the-extension-to-allow-dereferencing-void-in-c/65708

There is no good reason to allow this when the other compilers all
reject this, and it messes with SFINAE/constraint checking.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135287
2022-10-10 07:11:46 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
2dbfd06f2a [Clang] fix -Wvoid-ptr-dereference for gnu89
Follow up to D134702; it looks like we were still warning for gnu89
mode.

Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134702
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1720#issuecomment-1265738778

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135090
2022-10-04 13:01:01 -07:00
Jun Zhang
89e56e732d
[Clang] Don't warn if deferencing void pointers in unevaluated context
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D134461, Clang will diagnose a warning if
trying to deference void pointers in C mode. However, this causes a lot
of noises when compiling a 5.19.11 Linux kernel.

This patch reduces the warning by marking deferencing void pointers in
unevaluated context OK, like `sizeof(*void_ptr)`, `typeof(*void_ptr)`
and etc.

Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1720

Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134702
2022-09-28 12:30:02 +08:00
Jun Zhang
e07ead85a3
[Clang] Warn when trying to dereference void pointers in C
Previously we only have an extension that warn void pointer deferencing
in C++, but for C we did nothing.

C2x 6.5.3.2p4 says The unary * operator denotes indirection. If it points
to an object, the result is an lvalue designating the object. However, there
is no way to form an lvalue designating an object of an incomplete type as
6.3.2.1p1 says "an lvalue is an expression (with an object type other than
void)", so the behavior is undefined.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53631

Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134461
2022-09-24 22:18:04 +08:00
Erich Keane
babdef27c5 Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"
This reverts commit 95d94a67755620c0a2871ac6f056ca8e9731d5e9.

This implements the deferred concepts instantiation, which should allow
the libstdc++ ranges to properly compile, and for the CRTP to work for
constrained functions.

Since the last attempt, this has fixed the issues from @wlei and
@mordante.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-09-22 05:53:59 -07:00
Haojian Wu
e0cdafe8d4 [AST] Better recovery on an expression refers to an invalid decl.
Prior to the patch, we didn't build a DeclRefExpr if the Decl being
referred to is invalid, because many clang downstream AST consumers
assume it, violating it will cause many diagnostic regressions.

With this patch, we build a DeclRefExpr enven for an invalid decl (when the
AcceptInvalidDecl is true), and wrap it with a dependent-type
RecoveryExpr (to prevent follow-up semantic analysis, and diagnostic
regressions).

This is a revised version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831

Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121599
2022-09-22 14:23:47 +02:00
Dmitry Polukhin
133b6d7db9 [clang][C++20] Fix clang/clangd assert/crash after compilation errors
After compilation errors, expression a transformation result may not be usable.
It triggers an assert in RemoveNestedImmediateInvocation and SIGSEGV in case of
builds without asserts. This issue significantly affects clangd because source
may not be valid during typing. Tests cases that I attached was reduce from huge
C++ translation unit.

Test Plan: check-clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133948
2022-09-17 07:37:19 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
5d92d0b0f8 Correctly diagnose use of long long literals w/o a suffix
We would diagnose use of `long long` as an extension in C89 and C++98
modes when the user spelled the type `long long` or used the `LL`
literal suffix, but failed to diagnose when the literal had no suffix
but required a `long long` to represent the value.
2022-09-17 07:55:10 -04:00
Matheus Izvekov
67e2298311
[clang] use getCommonSugar in an assortment of places
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).

We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
2022-09-16 16:36:00 +02:00
Matheus Izvekov
1d1a98e9a0
Revert "[clang] use getCommonSugar in an assortment of places"
This reverts commit aff1f6310e5f4cea92c4504853d5fd824754a74f.
2022-09-16 12:03:34 +02:00
Matheus Izvekov
aff1f6310e
[clang] use getCommonSugar in an assortment of places
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).

We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
2022-09-16 11:55:40 +02:00
Fangrui Song
d8c09b7bbc Revert D111509 "[clang] use getCommonSugar in an assortment of places"
This reverts commit d42122cd5db021e6b14a90a98ad1dd09412efb4c.

`clang++ gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/complex_io.cc` (all language modes) crashes.
Also see https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509#3777980
2022-09-08 17:09:18 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
d42122cd5d
[clang] use getCommonSugar in an assortment of places
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).

We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.

Depends on D111283

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
2022-09-08 19:17:53 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
b7a7aeee90 [clang] Qualify auto in range-based for loops (NFC) 2022-09-03 23:27:27 -07:00
Utkarsh Saxena
e7eec38246 [clang] Skip re-building lambda expressions in parameters to consteval fns.
As discussed in this [comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56183#issuecomment-1224331699),
we end up building the lambda twice: once while parsing the function calls and then again while handling the immediate invocation.

This happens specially during removing nested immediate invocation.
Eg: When we have another consteval function as the parameter along with this lambda expression. Eg: `foo(bar([]{}))`, `foo(bar(), []{})`

While removing such nested immediate invocations, we should not rebuild this lambda. (IIUC, rebuilding a lambda would always generate a new type which will never match the original type from parsing)

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56183
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51695
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50455
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54872
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54587

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132945
2022-09-02 12:30:52 +02:00
Utkarsh Saxena
4a043c6376 PotentiallyEvaluatedContext in a ImmediateFunctionContext.
Body of `consteval` should be in an `ImmediateFunctionContext` instead of `ConstantEvaluated`.
PotentiallyEvaluated expressions in Immediate functions are in a `ImmediateFunctionContext` as well.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51182
Original divergence: https://godbolt.org/z/vadGT5j6f

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132659
2022-08-26 10:30:10 +02:00
Akira Hatanaka
5d794552bc [Sema][ObjC] Don't warn about implicitly-retained self in an unevaluated
context
2022-08-22 12:16:37 -07:00
Erich Keane
95d94a6775 Revert "Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""
This reverts commit d483730d8c3fa2e0d4192b2f3c61c761b124e6ad.

This allegedly breaks a significant part of facebooks internal build.
Reverting while we wait for them to provide a reproducer of this from
@wlei.
2022-08-19 12:47:34 -07:00
Utkarsh Saxena
0e0e8b6576 Do not evaluate dependent immediate invocations
We deferred the evaluation of dependent immediate invocations in https://reviews.llvm.org/D119375 until instantiation.
We should also not consider them referenced from a non-consteval context.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55601

```
template<typename T>
class Bar {
  consteval static T x() { return 5; }
 public:
  Bar() : a(x()) {}

 private:
  int a;
};

Bar<int> g();
```
Is now accepted by clang. Previously it errored with: `cannot take address of consteval function 'x' outside of an immediate invocation  Bar() : a(x()) {}`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132031
2022-08-18 10:30:40 +02:00
Erich Keane
d483730d8c Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""
This reverts commit 258c3aee54e11bc5c5d8ac137eb15e8d5bbcc7e4.

This should fix the libc++ issue that caused the revert, by re-designing
slightly how we determined when we should evaluate the constraints.
Additionally, many of the other components to the original patch (the
NFC parts) were committed separately to shrink the size of this patch
for review.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-08-17 06:24:40 -07:00
YingChi Long
ccbc22cd89
[Sema] fix false -Wcomma being emitted from void returning functions
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57151

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131892
2022-08-16 20:44:38 +08:00
David Truby
286d59ef6f [clang][AArch64][SVE] Add unary +/- operators for SVE types
This patch enables the unary promotion and negation operators on
SVE types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130984
2022-08-10 10:32:43 +00:00
Fangrui Song
3f18f7c007 [clang] LLVM_FALLTHROUGH => [[fallthrough]]. NFC
With C++17 there is no Clang pedantic warning or MSVC C5051.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131346
2022-08-08 09:12:46 -07:00
Corentin Jabot
a1a71b7dc9 [Clang] Fix capture of values initialized by bitfields
This fixes a regression introduced in 127bf44

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131202
2022-08-04 23:58:47 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
127bf44385 [Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.

This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.

In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.

We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.

In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.

Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.

at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
2022-08-04 10:12:53 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
a274219600 Revert "[Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas"
This reverts commit 44f2baa3804a62ca793f0ff3e43aa71cea91a795.

Breaks self builds and seems to have conformance issues.
2022-08-03 21:00:29 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
44f2baa380 [Clang][C++20] Support capturing structured bindings in lambdas
This completes the implementation of P1091R3 and P1381R1.

This patch allow the capture of structured bindings
both for C++20+ and C++17, with extension/compat warning.

In addition, capturing an anonymous union member,
a bitfield, or a structured binding thereof now has a
better diagnostic.

We only support structured bindings - as opposed to other kinds
of structured statements/blocks. We still emit an error for those.

In addition, support for structured bindings capture is entirely disabled in
OpenMP mode as this needs more investigation - a specific diagnostic indicate the feature is not yet supported there.

Note that the rest of P1091R3 (static/thread_local structured bindings) was already implemented.

at the request of @shafik, i can confirm the correct behavior of lldb wit this change.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54300
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52720

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122768
2022-08-03 20:00:01 +02:00
Matheus Izvekov
15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Corentin Jabot
0ba128f7c8 [Clang] De-deprecate volatile compound operations
As per P2327R1,

|=, &= and ^= are no longer deprecated in all languages mode.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130421
2022-07-24 16:16:52 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
70257fab68 Use any_of (NFC) 2022-07-22 01:05:17 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
8b3ed1fa98 Remove redundant return statements (NFC)
Identified with readability-redundant-control-flow.
2022-07-17 15:37:46 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Erich Keane
e71fd54719 [NFC] Move check for isEqualityOp to CheckFloatComparisons
So callers don't have to.  Also, fix a clang-format/use of auto fix in
CheckFloatComparisons.
2022-07-14 09:30:29 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Nathan James
54f57d3847
[clang] Add a fixit for warn-self-assign if LHS is a field with the same name as parameter on RHS
Add a fix-it for the common case of setters/constructors using parameters with the same name as fields
```lang=c++
struct A{
  int X;
  A(int X) { /*this->*/X = X; }
  void setX(int X) { /*this->*/X = X;
};
```

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129202
2022-07-09 08:28:07 +01:00
Corentin Jabot
a9a60f20e6 [Clang] Rename StringLiteral::isAscii() => isOrdinary() [NFC]
"Ascii" StringLiteral instances are actually narrow strings
that are UTF-8 encoded and do not have an encoding prefix.
(UTF8 StringLiteral are also UTF-8 encoded strings, but with
the u8 prefix.

To avoid possible confusion both with actuall ASCII strings,
and with future works extending the set of literal encodings
supported by clang, this rename StringLiteral::isAscii() to
isOrdinary(), matching C++ standard terminology.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128762
2022-06-29 18:28:51 +02:00
Chuanqi Xu
9c04851cf5 [C++20] [Module] Support reachable definition initially/partially
This patch introduces a new kind of ModuleOwnershipKind as
ReachableWhenImported. This intended the status for reachable described
at: https://eel.is/c++draft/module.reach#3.

Note that this patch is not intended to support all semantics about
reachable semantics. For example, this patch didn't implement discarded
declarations in GMF. (https://eel.is/c++draft/module.global.frag#3).

This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52281 and
https://godbolt.org/z/81f3ocjfW.

Reviewed By: rsmith, iains

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113545
2022-06-29 12:48:48 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
7a541406b5 Revert "[C++20] [Modules] Implement Reachable initiallly"
This reverts commit a223ba0a697c1598b434cf2495c9cd9ec5640fc7.

The previous commit don't contain additional information, which is bad.
2022-06-29 12:43:26 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
a223ba0a69 [C++20] [Modules] Implement Reachable initiallly 2022-06-29 12:32:31 +08:00
Kazu Hirata
80c12bdb3b [clang] Call *set::insert without checking membership first (NFC) 2022-06-18 10:41:26 -07:00