These are an artifact of how types are structured but serve little
purpose, merely showing that the type is sugared in some way. For
example, ElaboratedType's existence means struct S gets printed as
'struct S':'struct S' in the AST, which is unnecessary visual clutter.
Note that skipping the second print when the types have the same string
matches what we do for diagnostics, where the aka will be skipped.
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
This reverts commit d42122cd5db021e6b14a90a98ad1dd09412efb4c.
`clang++ gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/complex_io.cc` (all language modes) crashes.
Also see https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509#3777980
For this patch, a simple search was performed for patterns where there are
two types (usually an LHS and an RHS) which are structurally the same, and there
is some result type which is resolved as either one of them (typically LHS for
consistency).
We change those cases to resolve as the common sugared type between those two,
utilizing the new infrastructure created for this purpose.
Depends on D111283
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111509
This is a recommit of b822efc7404bf09ccfdc1ab7657475026966c3b2,
reverted in dc34d8df4c48b3a8f474360970cae8a58e6c84f0. The commit caused
fails because the test ast-print-fp-pragmas.c did not specify particular
target, and it failed on targets which do not support constrained
intrinsics. The original commit message is below.
AST does not have special nodes for pragmas. Instead a pragma modifies
some state variables of Sema, which in turn results in modified
attributes of AST nodes. This technique applies to floating point
operations as well. Every AST node that can depend on FP options keeps
current set of them.
This technique works well for options like exception behavior or fast
math options. They represent instructions to the compiler how to modify
code generation for the affected nodes. However treatment of FP control
modes has problems with this technique. Modifying FP control mode
(like rounding direction) usually requires operations on hardware, like
writing to control registers. It must be done prior to the first
operation that depends on the control mode. In particular, such
operations are required for implementation of `pragma STDC FENV_ROUND`,
compiler should set up necessary rounding direction at the beginning of
compound statement where the pragma occurs. As there is no representation
for pragmas in AST, the code generation becomes a complicated task in
this case.
To solve this issue FP options are kept inside CompoundStmt. Unlike to FP
options in expressions, these does not affect any operation on FP values,
but only inform the codegen about the FP options that act in the body of
the statement. As all pragmas that modify FP environment may occurs only
at the start of compound statement or at global level, such solution
works for all relevant pragmas. The options are kept as a difference
from the options in the enclosing compound statement or default options,
it helps codegen to set only changed control modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123952
On some buildbots test `ast-print-fp-pragmas.c` fails, need to investigate it.
This reverts commit 0401fd12d4aa0553347fe34d666fb236d8719173.
This reverts commit b822efc7404bf09ccfdc1ab7657475026966c3b2.
AST does not have special nodes for pragmas. Instead a pragma modifies
some state variables of Sema, which in turn results in modified
attributes of AST nodes. This technique applies to floating point
operations as well. Every AST node that can depend on FP options keeps
current set of them.
This technique works well for options like exception behavior or fast
math options. They represent instructions to the compiler how to modify
code generation for the affected nodes. However treatment of FP control
modes has problems with this technique. Modifying FP control mode
(like rounding direction) usually requires operations on hardware, like
writing to control registers. It must be done prior to the first
operation that depends on the control mode. In particular, such
operations are required for implementation of `pragma STDC FENV_ROUND`,
compiler should set up necessary rounding direction at the beginning of
compound statement where the pragma occurs. As there is no representation
for pragmas in AST, the code generation becomes a complicated task in
this case.
To solve this issue FP options are kept inside CompoundStmt. Unlike to FP
options in expressions, these does not affect any operation on FP values,
but only inform the codegen about the FP options that act in the body of
the statement. As all pragmas that modify FP environment may occurs only
at the start of compound statement or at global level, such solution
works for all relevant pragmas. The options are kept as a difference
from the options in the enclosing compound statement or default options,
it helps codegen to set only changed control modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123952
Previously `#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON` always set dynamic rounding
mode and strict exception handling. It is not correct in the presence
of other pragmas that also modify rounding mode and exception handling.
For example, the effect of previous pragma FENV_ROUND could be
cancelled, which is not conformant with the C standard. Also
`#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS OFF` turned off only FEnvAccess flag, leaving
rounding mode and exception handling unchanged, which is incorrect in
general case.
Concrete rounding and exception mode depend on a combination of several
factors like various pragmas and command-line options. During the review
of this patch an idea was proposed that the semantic actions associated
with such pragmas should only set appropriate flags. Actual rounding
mode and exception handling should be calculated taking into account the
state of all relevant options. In such implementation the pragma
FENV_ACCESS should not override properties set by other pragmas but
should set them if such setting is absent.
To implement this approach the following main changes are made:
- Field `FPRoundingMode` is removed from `LangOptions`. Actually there
are no options that set it to arbitrary rounding mode, the choice was
only `dynamic` or `tonearest`. Instead, a new boolean flag
`RoundingMath` is added, with the same meaning as the corresponding
command-line option.
- Type `FPExceptionModeKind` now has possible value `FPE_Default`. It
does not represent any particular exception mode but indicates that
such mode was not set and default value should be used. It allows to
distinguish the case:
{
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where the pragma must set FPE_Strict, from the case:
{
#pragma clang fp exceptions(ignore)
#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
...
}
where exception mode should remain `FPE_Ignore`.
- Class `FPOptions` has now methods `getRoundingMode` and
`getExceptionMode`, which calculates the respective properties from
other specified FP properties.
- Class `LangOptions` has now methods `getDefaultRoundingMode` and
`getDefaultExceptionMode`, which calculates default modes from the
specified options and should be used instead of `getRoundingMode` and
`getFPExceptionMode` of the same class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126364
Previously methods `FPOptions::get*` returned unsigned value even if the
corresponding property was represented by specific enumeration type. With
this change such methods return actual type of the property. It also
allows printing value of a property as text rather than integer code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87812
This is recommit of 6c8041aa0f, reverted in de044f7562 because of some
fails. Original commit message is below.
This change allow a CastExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. Of all cast nodes only ImplicitCastExpr,
CStyleCastExpr, CXXFunctionalCastExpr and CXXStaticCastExpr are allowed
to have FPOptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85960
This change allow a CastExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. Of all cast nodes only ImplicitCastExpr,
CStyleCastExpr, CXXFunctionalCastExpr and CXXStaticCastExpr are allowed
to have FPOptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85960
This change implements pragma STDC FENV_ROUND, which is introduced by
the extension to standard (TS 18661-1). The pragma is implemented only
in frontend, it sets apprpriate state of FPOptions stored in Sema. Use
of these bits in constant evaluation adn/or code generator is not in the
scope of this change.
Parser issues warning on unsuppored pragma when it encounteres pragma
STDC FENV_ROUND, however it makes syntax checks and updates Sema state
as if the pragma were supported.
Primary purpose of the partial implementation is to facilitate
development of non-default floating poin environment. Previously a
developer cannot set non-default rounding mode in sources, this mades
preparing tests for say constant evaluation substantially complicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86921
This change allow a CallExpr to have optional FPOptionsOverride object,
stored in trailing storage. The implementaion is made similar to the way
used in BinaryOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84343
