We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the twelfth batch of tests being updated (the end may be in
sight soon though).
Today the optimization is limited to:
- `[ClassName alloc]`
- `[self alloc]` when within a class method
However it means that when code is written this way:
```
@interface MyObject
- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone
{
return [[self.class alloc] _initWith...];
}
@end
```
... then the optimization doesn't kick in and `+[NSObject alloc]` ends
up in IMP caches where it could have been avoided. It turns out that
`+alloc` -> `+[NSObject alloc]` is the most cached SEL/IMP pair in the
entire platform which is rather silly).
There's two theoretical risks allowing this optimization:
1. if the receiver is nil (which it can't be today), but it turns out
that `objc_alloc()`/`objc_alloc_init()` cope with a nil receiver,
2. if the `Clas` type for the receiver is a lie. However, for such a
code to work today (and not fail witn an unrecognized selector
anyway) you'd have to have implemented the `-alloc` **instance
method**.
Fortunately, `objc_alloc()` doesn't assume that the receiver is a
Class, it basically starts with a test that is similar to
`if (receiver->isa->bits & hasDefaultAWZ) { /* fastpath */ }`.
This bit is only set on metaclasses by the runtime, so if an instance
is passed to this function by accident, its isa will fail this test,
and `objc_alloc()` will gracefully fallback to `objc_msgSend()`.
The one thing `objc_alloc()` doesn't support is tagged pointer
instances. None of the tagged pointer classes implement an instance
method called `'alloc'` (actually there's a single class in the
entire Apple codebase that has such a method).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71682
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58058316
Reviewed-By: Akira Hatanaka
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
'objc_alloc(self)'
Also convert '[[self alloc] init]' in a class method to a call to
'objc_alloc_init(self)'.
rdar://problem/50855121
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62643
llvm-svn: 362521
ObjCMessageExpr::getInstanceReceiver returns nullptr if the receiver
is 'super'. Make this check more strict, since we don't care about
messages to super here.
rdar://48247290
llvm-svn: 354826
This provides a code size win on the caller side, since the init
message send is done in the runtime function.
rdar://44987038
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57936
llvm-svn: 354056
