This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
This patch makes std::pair's constructors and assignment operators
closer to conforming in C++23. The only missing bit I am aware of
now is `reference_constructs_from_temporary_v` checks, which we
don't have the tools for yet.
This patch also refactors a long-standing non-standard extension where
we'd provide constructors for tuple-like types in all standard modes. The
criteria for being a tuple-like type are different from pair-like types
as introduced recently in the standard, leading to a lot of complexity
when trying to implement recent papers that touch the pair constructors.
After this patch, the pre-C++23 extension is provided in a self-contained
block so that we can easily deprecate and eventually remove the extension
in future releases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143914
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
Rename the `__tuple` directory in libc++ headers to `__tuple_dir`
to avoid file collision when installing. Historically, `__tuple` has
been a file and it has been replaced by a directory
in 2d52c6bfae801b016dd3627b8c0e7c4a99405549. Replacing a regular file
with a directory (or more importantly, the other way around when
downgrading) is not universally supported. Since this is an internal
header, its actual name should not matter, so just rename it to avoid
problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139270
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
However, there's a problem on both GCC and Clang: they can't mangle
`__is_same(T,U)` if it appears anywhere that affects mangling. That's
a hard error. And it turns out that GCC puts dependent return types
into the mangling more aggressively than Clang, so for GCC's benefit
we need to avoid using raw `_IsSame` in the return type of
`swap(tuple&, tuple&)`. Therefore, make `__all` into a named type
instead of an alias.
If we ever need to support a compiler without the __is_same builtin,
we can make this an alias template for `is_same<T,U>::type`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115100
Clang used to support [[nodebug]] everywhere except on typedefs. Since
we don't support such old Clangs anymore, we can get rid of _LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE
in favour of always using _LIBCPP_NODEBUG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108996
The new meta-programming primitives are lower cost than the old versions. This patch removes those old versions and switches libc++ to use the new ones.
llvm-svn: 364160
When applied to a typedef or alias template, the [[nodebug]] attribute
makes the typedef transparent to the debugger, so instead of seeing
`std::__function::__alloc_func<remove_reference<void(&)()>::type,
allocator<remove_reference<void(&)()>, void()>::_Target` you see
`void(&)()` as the type of the variable in your debugger.
Removing all this SFINAE noise from debug info has huge binary size
wins, in addition to improving the readability.
For now this change is on by default. Users can override it by
specifying -D_LIBCPP_NODEBUG_TYPE=
llvm-svn: 363117
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
llvm-svn: 291019
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
This patch reverts the changes to tuple which fixed construction from
types derived from tuple. It breaks the code mentioned in llvm.org/PR31384.
I'll follow this commit up with a test case.
llvm-svn: 289773
Summary:
The standard requires tuple have the following constructors:
```
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> const&);
tuple(tuple<OtherTypes...> &&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> const&);
tuple(pair<T1, T2> &&);
tuple(array<T, N> const&);
tuple(array<T, N> &&);
```
However libc++ implements these as a single constructor with the signature:
```
template <class TupleLike, enable_if_t<__is_tuple_like<TupleLike>::value>>
tuple(TupleLike&&);
```
This causes the constructor to reject types derived from tuple-like types; Unlike if we had all of the concrete overloads, because they cause the derived->base conversion in the signature.
This patch fixes this issue by detecting derived types and the tuple-like base they are derived from. It does this by creating an overloaded function with signatures for each of tuple/pair/array and checking if the possibly derived type can convert to any of them.
This patch fixes [PR17550]( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17550)
This patch
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, mpark, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606
llvm-svn: 289727
Summary:
Currently a number of GCC warnings are emitted when building libc++. This patch fixes or ignores all of them. The primary changes are:
* Work around strict aliasing issues in `typeinfo::hash_code()` by using __attribute__((may_alias)). However I think a non-aliasing `hash_code()` implementation is possible. Further investigation needed.
* Add `_LIBCPP_UNREACHABLE()` to switch in `strstream.cpp` to avoid -Wpotentially-uninitialized.
* Fix -Wunused-value warning in `__all` by adding a void cast.
* Ignore -Wattributes for now. There are a number of real attribute issues when using GCC but enabling the warning is too noisy.
* Ignore -Wliteral-suffix since it warns about the use of reserved identifiers. Note Only GCC 7.0 supports disabling this warning.
* Ignore -Wc++14-compat since it warns about the sized new/delete overloads.
Reviewers: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24003
llvm-svn: 280007
This patch is the last in a series that replaces recursive meta-programming
in std::tuple with non-recursive implementations.
Previously std::tuple could only be instantiated with 126 elements before
it blew the max template instantiation depth. Now the size of std::tuple is
essentially unbounded (I've tested with over 5000 elements).
One unfortunate side-effect of this change is that tuple_constructible
and similar no longer short circuit after the first failure. Instead they
evaluate the conditions for all elements. This could be potentially breaking.
I plan to look into this further.
llvm-svn: 274331
This patch attempts to improve the QoI of std::tuples tuple_element and
__make_tuple_types helpers. Previously they required O(N) instantiations,
one for every element in the tuple
The new implementations are O(1) after __tuple_indices<Id...> is created.
llvm-svn: 274330
The previous __make_tuple_indices implementation caused O(N) instantiations
and was pretty inefficient. The C++14 __make_integer_sequence implementation
is much better, since it either uses a builtin to generate the sequence or
a very nice Log8(N) implementation provided by richard smith.
This patch moves the __make_integer_sequence implementation into __tuple
and uses it to implement __make_tuple_indices.
Since libc++ can't expose the name 'integer_sequence' in C++11 this patch
also introduces a dummy type '__integer_sequence' which is used when generating
the sequence. One the sequence is generated '__integer_sequence' can be
converted into the required type; either '__tuple_indices' or 'integer_sequence'.
llvm-svn: 274286
Summary:
There is no reason to guard `tuple_size`, `tuple_element` and `get<I>(...)` for pair and array inside of `<__tuple>` so that they are only available when we have variadic templates.
This requires there be redundant declarations and definitions. It also makes it easy to get things wrong.
For example the following code should compile (and does in c++11).
```
#define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
#include <array>
int main()
{
static_assert((std::tuple_size<std::array<int, 10> volatile>::value == 10), "");
}
```
This patch lifts the non-variadic parts of `tuple_size`, `tuple_types`, and `get<I>(...)` to the top of `<__tuple>` where they don't require variadic templates. This patch also removes `<__tuple_03>` because there is no longer a need for it.
Reviewers: danalbert, K-ballo, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7774
llvm-svn: 232492
Summary:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18345
Tuple's constructor and assignment operators for "tuple-like" types evaluates __make_tuple_types unnecessarily. In the case of a large array this can blow the template instantiation depth.
Ex:
```
#include <array>
#include <tuple>
#include <memory>
typedef std::array<int, 1256> array_t;
typedef std::tuple<array_t> tuple_t;
int main() {
array_t a;
tuple_t t(a); // broken
t = a; // broken
// make_shared uses tuple behind the scenes. This bug breaks this code.
std::make_shared<array_t>(a);
}
```
To prevent this from happening we delay the instantiation of `__make_tuple_types` until after we perform the length check. Currently `__make_tuple_types` is instantiated at the same time that the length check .
Test Plan: Two tests have been added. One for the "tuple-like" constructors and another for the "tuple-like" assignment operator.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: K-ballo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4467
llvm-svn: 220769
