'x86-64' has started to reflect a sort of generic tuning flag for more modern 64-bit CPUs. We probably shouldn't be using it as the name of an unidentifiable pentium4. So use nocona for all 64-bit pentium4s instead.
llvm-svn: 317230
We know that's the earliest CPU with 64-bit support. x86-64 has taken on a role of representing a more modern 64-bit CPU so we probably shouldn't be using that when we can't identify things.
llvm-svn: 317229
The original change was reverted in rL317217 because of the failure in
the RS4GC testcase. I couldn't reproduce the failure on my local machine
(macbook) but could reproduce it on a linux box.
The failure was around removing the uses of invariant.start. The fix
here is to just RAUW undef (which was the first implementation in D39388).
This is perfectly valid IR as discussed in the review.
llvm-svn: 317225
Summary:
macOS builds of LLDB use the bundle version from
`tools/driver/lldb-Info.plist`. That file hasn't been updated since the 4.0
release so the version we print provides no value. I also think that even if it
were up to date, that number has no meaning and displaying the version from the
LLVM tree is more valuable.
I know that Apple folks have some form of override for the clang version to
match the Xcode version, so it'd make sense for them to do the same for LLDB.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39429
llvm-svn: 317218
Summary:
Invariant.start on memory locations has the property that the memory
location is unchanging. However, this is not true in the face of
rewriting statepoints for GC.
Teach RS4GC about removing invariant.start so that optimizations after
RS4GC does not incorrect sink a load from the memory location past a
statepoint.
Added test showcasing the issue.
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, dneilson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39388
llvm-svn: 317215
This was never used in the upstream compiler and was responsible
for some problems with reductions in the clang-ykt fork.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39553
llvm-svn: 317214
undefined reference to `llvm::TargetPassConfig::ID' on
clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
This reverts commit eea333c33fa73ad225ef28607795984829f65688.
llvm-svn: 317213
Summary:
This is mostly a noop (most of the test diffs are renamed blocks).
There are a few temporary register renames (eax<->ecx) and a few blocks are
shuffled around.
See the discussion in PR33325 for more details.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39456
llvm-svn: 317211
If the thread id is requested in windows mode within funclets, we may
generate incorrect function call that could lead to broken codegen.
llvm-svn: 317208
We can generate constant sized arrays whenever the array section has constant
length, even if the base expression itself is a VLA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39504
llvm-svn: 317207
When splitting a large load to smaller legally-typed loads, the last load should be padded to reach the size of the previous one so a CONCAT_VECTORS node could reunite them again.
The code currently pads the last load to reach the size of the first load (instead of the previous).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38495
Change-Id: Ib60b55ed26ce901fabf68108daf52683fbd5013f
llvm-svn: 317206
CLion's Sax parser threw this error:
Failed to parse clang-format XML replacements. Input: <?xml version='1.0'?>
<replacements xml:space='preserve' incomplete_format='true' line=89>
[...]
[org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 2; columnNumber: 66; Open quote is expected for attribute "line" associated with an element type "replacements".]
Patch by Justine Tunney (jart@google.com)!
llvm-svn: 317205
MSA stores and loads to the stack are more likely to require an
emergency GPR spill slot due to the smaller offsets available
with those instructions.
Handle this by overestimating the size of the stack by determining
the largest offset presuming that all callee save registers are
spilled and accounting of incoming arguments when determining
whether an emergency spill slot is required.
Reviewers: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39056
llvm-svn: 317204
