Chances are we'll be asked again after type legalization, but before that point
it's better to claim misaligned accesses aren't allowed than to assert.
llvm-svn: 332840
The first version of the patch (r332228) was flawed because it was
putting structors into C5/D5 comdats very eagerly. This is correct only
if we can ensure the comdat contains all required versions of the
structor (which wasn't the case). This version uses a more nuanced
approach:
- for local structor symbols we use an alias because we don't have to
worry about comdats or other compilation units.
- linkonce symbols are emitted separately, as we cannot guarantee we
will have all symbols we need to form a comdat (they are emitted
lazily, only when referenced).
- available_externally symbols are also emitted separately, as the code
seemed to be worried about emitting an alias in this case.
- other linkage types are not affected by the optimization level. They
either get put into a comdat (weak) or get aliased (external).
Reviewers: rjmccall, aprantl
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46685
llvm-svn: 332839
We were previously using a DT in CVP through SimplifyQuery, but not requiring it in
the new pass manager. Hence it would crash if DT was not already available. This now
gets DT directly and plumbs it through to where it is used (instead of using it
through SQ).
llvm-svn: 332836
MipsLongBranchPass and MipsHazardSchedule passes are joined to one pass
because of mutual conflict. When MipsHazardSchedule inserts 'nop's, it
potentially breaks some jumps, so they have to be expanded to long
branches. When some branch is expanded to long branch, it potentially
creates a hazard situation, which should be fixed by adding nops.
New pass is called MipsBranchExpansion, it combines these two passes,
and runs them alternately until one of them reports no changes were made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46641
llvm-svn: 332834
After closer examination, it turns out we mis-classify one of the
methods only if two of the structs have the same name. Since this was
meant to be a basic test, I rename one of the structs in the test so
that we have at least some coverage for the apple tables lookup.
Instead, I create an XFAILed test which specifically targets the
same-name case (and file a bug to track it).
llvm-svn: 332833
As suggested by Fabian on PR37426, we can use PMULUDQ to perform v4i32 vector rotations as the upper 32bits of the multiply will contain the 'wrapped' bits of the rotation.
v8i16/v16i8 rotations would be straightforward to add to lowerRotate in the future - ideally we'd mostly share code with the vector shifts lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46954
llvm-svn: 332832
Summary:
Now that we are able to parse MachO files everywhere, we can write some
cross-platform tests for handling of apple accelerator tables. This
reruns the same lookup tests we have for manual indexes on MachO files
which will use the accelerator tables instead. This makes sure we return
the same results regardless of the method we used to access the debug
info.
The tests confirm we return the same results for looking up types,
namespaces and variables, but have found an inconsistency in the
treatment of function lookup. In the function case we mis-classify the
method "foo" declared in the local struct sbar (inside function ffbar).
We classify it as a function whereas it really is a method. Preliminary
analysis suggests this is because
DWARFASTParserClang::GetClangDeclContextForDIE returns null when given
the local "struct sbar" DIE. This causes us to get the wrong
CompilerDeclContext when we ask for the context of the inner foo, which
means CompilerDeclContext::ISStructUnionOrClass returns false.
Until this is fixed, I do not include the darwin versions of the "base"
and "method" function lookup tests.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, ilya-biryukov, ioeric, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47064
llvm-svn: 332831
Summary:
These look to be a couple things that weren't removed when we switched to target attribute.
The popcnt makes including just smmintrin.h also include popcntintrin.h. The popcnt file itself already contains target attrributes.
The prefetch ones are just wrappers around __builtin_prefetch which we have graceful fallbacks for in the backend if the exact instruction isn't available. So there's no reason to hide them. And it makes them available in functions that have the write target attribute but not a -march command line flag.
Reviewers: echristo, RKSimon, spatel, DavidKreitzer
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47029
llvm-svn: 332830
Summary: Add wrappers for a module's alias iterators and a getter and setter for the aliasee value.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits, harlanhaskins
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46808
llvm-svn: 332826
Previously the compiler was using the microMIPSR3 variants, incorrectly.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46948
llvm-svn: 332820
We already do this for min/max (see the blob above the diff),
so we should do the same for abs/nabs.
A sign-bit check (<s 0) is used as a predicate for other IR
transforms and it's likely the best for codegen.
This might solve the motivating cases for D47037 and D47041,
but I think those patches still make sense. We can't guarantee
this canonicalization if the icmp has more than one use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47076
llvm-svn: 332819
This is useful to understand and debug the lazy template specializations
used in the pch and modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41785
llvm-svn: 332817
Summary:
- Provide LLVMGetValueName2 and LLVMSetValueName2 that return and take the length of the provided C string respectively
- Deprecate LLVMGetValueName and LLVMSetValueName
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits, harlanhaskins
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46890
llvm-svn: 332810
In the patch rL329547, we have lifted the over-restrictive limitation on collected range
checks, allowing to work with range checks with the end of their range not being
provably non-negative. However it appeared that the non-negativity of this value was
assumed in the utility function `ClampedSubtract`. In particular, its reasoning is based
on the fact that `0 <= SINT_MAX - X`, which is not true if `X` is negative.
The function `ClampedSubtract` is only called twice, once with `X = 0` (which is OK)
and the second time with `X = IRC.getEnd()`, where we may now see the problem if
the end is actually a negative value. In this case, we may sometimes miscompile.
This patch is the conservative fix of the miscompile problem. Rather than rejecting
non-provably non-negative `getEnd()` values, we will check it for non-negativity in
runtime. For this, we use function `smax(smin(X, 0), -1) + 1` that is equal to `1` if `X`
is non-negative and is equal to 0 if `X` is negative. If we multiply `Begin, End` of safe
iteration space by this function calculated for `X = IRC.getEnd()`, we will get the original
`[Begin, End)` if `IRC.getEnd()` was non-negative (and, thus, `ClampedSubtract` worked
correctly) and the empty range `[0, 0)` in case if ` IRC.getEnd()` was negative.
So we in fact prohibit execution of the main loop if at least one of range checks was
made against a negative value (and we figured it out in runtime). It is still better than
what we have before (non-negativity had to be proved in compile time) and prevents
us from miscompile, however it is sometiles too restrictive for unsigned range checks
against a negative value (which in fact can be eliminated).
Once we re-implement `ClampedSubtract` in a way that it handles negative `X` correctly,
this limitation can be lifted, too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46860
Reviewed By: samparker
llvm-svn: 332809
Summary:
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rL332804 I loosed the assertion in
the Clang driver test that forced me to revert
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL332299. Once this lands I should be
able to narrow down what caused PS4 buildbots to fail, and
reinstate the check in that test.
Test Plan: check-llvm & check-clang
llvm-svn: 332805
Summary:
When https://reviews.llvm.org/D46776 landed to improve the behavior of
`llvm::OptTable::findNearest`, a PS4 buildbot began failing due to an
assertion that a suggestion "-debug-info-macro" should be provided for
the unrecognized option `clang -cc1as -debug-info-macros`. All other
buildbots succeeded in this check, and the PS4 buildbot succeeded in the
other `findNearest` tests.
Temporarily loosen this check in order to reland the `findNearest`
change.
Test Plan: check-clang
llvm-svn: 332804
When a lambda capture captures a __block in the same statement, the compiler asserts out because isCapturedBy assumes that an Expr can only be a BlockExpr, StmtExpr, or if it's a Stmt then all the statement's children are expressions. That's wrong, we need to visit all sub-statements even if they're not expressions to see if they also capture.
Fix this issue by pulling out the isCapturedBy logic to use RecursiveASTVisitor.
<rdar://problem/39926584>
llvm-svn: 332801
Summary:
There are cases where the same string or select is repeated verbatim in a lot of diagnostics. This can be a pain to maintain and update. Tablegen provides no way stash the common text somewhere and reuse it in the diagnostics, until now!
This patch allows diagnostic texts to contain `%sub{<definition-name>}`, where `<definition-name>` names a Tablegen record of type `TextSubstitution`. These substitutions are done early, before the diagnostic string is otherwise processed. All `%sub` modifiers will be replaced before the diagnostic definitions are emitted.
The substitution must specify all arguments used by the substitution, and modifier indexes in the substitution are re-numbered accordingly. For example:
```
def select_ovl_candidate : TextSubstitution<"%select{function|constructor}0%select{| template| %2}1">;
```
when used as
```
"candidate `%sub{select_ovl_candidate}3,2,1 not viable"
```
will act as if we wrote:
```
"candidate %select{function|constructor}3%select{| template| %1}2 not viable"
```
Reviewers: rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46740
llvm-svn: 332799
Aaron Ballman reported that TestPlugin warned about it using exception handling
without /EHsc flag, and that llvmGetPassInfo() had conflicting export
attributes (dllimport in the header, dllexport in the source file).
/EHsc is because TestPlugin didn't use the llvm_ cmake functions, so
llvm_update_compile_flags didn't get called for the target
(llvm_update_compile_flags explicitly passes /Ehs-c-, which fixes the warning).
Use add_llvm_loadable_module instead of add_library(... MODULE) to fix this.
This also has the side effect of not building the plugin on Windows. That's not
a big problem, since before the plugin was built on Windows, but the test
didn't attempt to load it, due to -DLLVM_ENABLE_PLUGIN not being passed to
PluginsTests.cpp during compilation on Windows. This makes the plugin behavior
consistent with e.g. lib/Transforms/Hello/CMakeLists.txt. (This also
automatically sets LTDL_SHLIB_EXT correctly.)
The dllimport/dllexport warning is more serious: Since LLVM doesn't generally
use export annotations for its code, the only way the plugin could link was by
linking in some LLVM libraries both into the test and the dll, so the plugin
would call the llvm code in the dll instead of the copy in the main executable.
This means globals weren't shared, and things generally can't work. (I think
there's a build config where you can build a LLVM.dll which might work, but
that wasn't how the test was configured. If that config is used, the dll should
still be built, but I haven't checked).
Now that add_llvm_loadable_module is used, LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS got linked into
both executable and plugin on posix too, so unset it after the executable so
that the plugin doesn't end up with a 2nd copy of things on posix.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47082
llvm-svn: 332796
The evaluator goes through BB and creates global vars as temporary values to evaluate
results of LLVM instructions. It creates undef for alloca, however it assumes alloca
in addr space 0. If the next instruction is addrspace cast to 0, then we get an invalid
cast instruction.
This patch let the temp global var have an address space matching alloca addr space,
so that the valuation can be done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47081
llvm-svn: 332794
Summary:
The static TLS vector for the main thread on NetBSD/i386 can be
unaligned in terms of the shadow granularity. Align the start of it with
Round Down and end of it with Round Up operations for the shadow
granularity shift.
Example static TLS vector ranges on NetBSD/i386:
tls_begin_=0xfbee7244 tls_end_=0xfbee726c.
ClearShadowForThreadStackAndTLS() is called from the Main Thread
bootstrap functions.
This change restores the NetBSD x86 32-bit (i386) support.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: vitalybuka, joerg
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46585
llvm-svn: 332792
Summary:
The changes allows building this file on NetBSD, mostly by
disabling the unsupported functions and adding OS-specific
system includes.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, kcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46712
llvm-svn: 332791
Summary:
invariant.group.launder should not stop propagation
of nonnull and dereferenceable, because e.g. we would not be
able to hoist loads speculatively.
Reviewers: rsmith, amharc, kuhar, xbolva00, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46972
llvm-svn: 332788
Summary:
This feature is not needed, but it might be usefull in the future
to use metadata to mark what which function should support it
(and strip it when not).
Reviewers: rsmith, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45419
llvm-svn: 332787
