Zero ranked tensor (say tensor<i1>) when used for arith.select's condition,
crashes optimizer during bufferization. This patch puts a constraint on
condition to be either scalar or of matching shape as to its result.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151270
The existing BOLT install targets are broken on Windows becase they
don't properly handle the output extension. We cannot use the existing
LLVM macros since those make assumptions that don't hold for BOLT. This
change instead implements custom macros following the approach used by
Clang and LLD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151595
Encountered ASAN crash and found it dereference without check pointer.
Reviewed By: kito-cheng, eklepilkina
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151716
Before this patch, we can only use the MaxBECount for an AddRec's range
computation if the MaxBECount has <= bit width of the AddRec. This patch
reasons that if a MaxBECount has > bit width, and is <= the max value of
AddRec's bit width, we can still use the MaxBECount.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151698
Currently desired bytecode version is clamped to the maximum. This allows requesting bytecode versions that do not exist. We have added callsite validation for this in StableHLO to ensure we don't pass an invalid version number, probably better if this is managed upstream. If a user wants to use the current version, then omitting `setDesiredBytecodeVersion` is the best way to do that (as opposed to providing a large number).
Adding this check will also properly error on older version numbers as we increment the minimum supported version. Silently claming on minimum version would likely lead to unintentional forward incompatibilities.
Separately, due to bytecode version being `int64_t` and using methods to read/write uints, we can generate payloads with invalid version numbers:
```
mlir-opt file.mlir --emit-bytecode --emit-bytecode-version=-1 | mlir-opt
<stdin>:0:0: error: bytecode version 18446744073709551615 is newer than the current version 5
```
This is fixed with version bounds checking as well.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151838
On AArch64, it is possible to have a program that accesses both low
(0x000...) and high (0xfff...) memory, and with pointer authentication,
you can have different numbers of bits used for pointer authentication
depending on whether the address is in high or low memory.
This adds a new target.process.highmem-virtual-addressable-bits
setting which the AArch64 Mac ABI plugin will use, when set, to
always set those unaddressable high bits for high memory addresses,
and will use the existing target.process.virtual-addressable-bits
setting for low memory addresses.
This patch does not change the existing behavior when only
target.process.virtual-addressable-bits is set. In that case, the
value will apply to all addresses.
Not yet done is recognizing metadata in a live process connection
(gdb-remote qHostInfo) or a Mach-O corefile LC_NOTE to set the
correct number of addressing bits for both memory ranges. That
will be a future change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151292
rdar://109746900
The tests introduced by https://reviews.llvm.org/D151589 were failing
because I guess some test platforms don't have `lld`. Similar tests add
`-B%S/Inputs/lld` to the clang commands so lets try this here to fix the
tests.
```
clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'
```
This simplifies the code inside copy/move and makes it easier to apply the optimization to other algorithms.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151265
Enable support for CSPGO for lld MachO targets.
Since lld MachO does not support `-plugin-opt=`, we need to create the `--cs-profile-generate` and `--cs-profile-path=` options and propagate them in `Darwin.cpp`. These flags are not supported by ld64.
Also outline code into `getLastCSProfileGenerateArg()` to share between `CommonArgs.cpp` and `Darwin.cpp`.
CSPGO is already implemented for ELF (https://reviews.llvm.org/D56675) and COFF (https://reviews.llvm.org/D98763).
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151589
Split DWARF doesn't handle LTO of any form (roughly there's an
assumption that each dwo file will have one CU - it's not explicitly
documented, nor explicitly handled, so the ecosystem isn't really well
understood/tested/etc).
This had previously been handled by implementing (& disabling by
default) the `-split-dwarf-cross-cu-references` flag, which would
disable use of ref_addr across two dwo CUs.
This worked for a while, at least in LTO (it didn't address Split
DWARF+Full LTO, but that's an unlikely combination, as the benefits of
Split DWARF are more limited in a full LTO build) - because the only
source of cross-CU references was inlined functions, so by making those
non-cross-CU (by moving the referenced inlined function DWARF
description into the referencing CU) the result was one CU per dwo.
But recently the Function Specialization pass was added to the ThinLTO
pipeline, which caused imported functions that may not be inlined to be
emitted by a backend compile. This meant foreign CU entities (not just
abstract origins/cross-CU referenced entities)/standalone foreign CUs
could be emitted by a backend compile.
The end result was, due to a bug* in binutils dwp (I think basically
it saw two CUs in a single dwo and reprocessed the offsets in the shared
debug_str_offsets.dwo section) this situation lead to corrupted strings.
So to make this more robust, I've generalized the definition of the
`-split-dwarf-cross-cu-references` flag (perhaps it should be renamed at
this point, but it's /really/ niche, doubt anyone's using it - more or
less there for experimentation when we get around to figuring out
spec'ing LTO+Split DWARF) to mean "single CU in a dwo file" and added
more general handling for this.
There's certainly some weird corner cases that could come up in terms of
"how do we choose which CU to put everything in" - for now it's "first
come, first served" which is probably going to be OK for ThinLTO - the
base module will have the first functions and first CU, imported
fragments will come after that. For LTO the choice will be fairly
arbitrary - but, again, essentially whichever module comes first.
* Arguably a bug in binutils dwp, but since the feature isn't well
specified, I'd rather avoid dabbling in this uncertain area and ensure
LLVM doesn't produce especially novel DWARF (dwos with multiple CUs)
regardless of whether binutils dwp would/should be fixed. I'm not
confident debuggers could read such a dwo file well, etc.
The partial move from JITTargetAddress to ExecutorAddr in 8b1771bd9f30 did not
update the ORC or Kaleidoscope documents. This patch fixes the inconsistency.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150458
The OpenMP DeviceRTL uses a hacky workaround to keep certain runtime
calls alive. This used a function that prevented them from being
optimized out. We needed this hack because the 'OpenMPOpt' pass likes to
introduce new runtime calls into the TU. This then interacted badly with
the method of linking the bitcode file per-TU like we do with Nvidia.
The OpenMPOpt pass would then generate a runtime call to a function that
was never linked in.
This should not be a problem anymore because we unconditionally link in
the `libomptarget.devicertl.a` runtime library. This should thus only
extract symbols that are undefined. So, if we do end up with an
unresolved reference it will be resolved by the static library.
The downside to this is that if we are doing non-LTO NVPTX compilation
that introduces one of these calls it will be linked outside the module
and therefore provide the overhead of an external function call.
However, removing this flag should make optimizing things easier. We
will need to see if that performance is a problem.
Reviewed By: ye-luo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151324
Add support for printing the passes run for LTO.
Both ELF and COFF have `--lto-debug-pass-manager` (`-ltodebugpassmanager`) to print the compiler passes run during LTO. This is useful to check that a certain compiler pass is run in a test, e.g., https://reviews.llvm.org/D151589
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, MaskRay, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151746
The previous code incorrectly assumed that we would never call
warnBracedScalarInit(...) with a EK_ParenAggInitMember. This patch fixes
the bug by warning when a scalar member is initialized via a braced-init
list when performing a parentehsized aggregate initialization. This
behavior is consistent with parentehsized list aggregate initialization.
Fixes#63008
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151763
This change adds op to support printf instruction from OpenCL extensions set.
This op helps writing out debug details from SPIRV kernel in a given format.
Patch By: drprajap
Reviewed By: antiagainst, kuhar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151731
Release pages for large block (size greater than a page) is faster than
the small blocks. Besides, larger blocks are supposed not to be used
so often like smaller blocks which means we may hold several pages used
by large block and rarely get chance to release them if there's no
explicit M_PURGE call. Therefore, relax the release-interval condition
for large block.
This also fixes the assumption that FORCE_ALL should always try page
release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151290
The last use was removed by:
commit 146ec74a8382dc820809d0a2bf4b918d0b5e6603
Author: Jan Svoboda <jan_svoboda@apple.com>
Date: Fri Sep 10 10:24:16 2021 +0200
Once I remove the function, RestoreCWD is always true, so this patch
removes the variable and propagates the constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151786
And also set the SHF_X86_64_LARGE section flag.
gcc only uses the "l" prefix and SHF_X86_64_LARGE in the medium code model for data larger than -mlarge-data-threshold. But it seems more consistent to use it in the large code model as well in case separate parts of the binary aren't compiled with the large code model and also have a .data/.bss/.rodata section.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, tkoeppe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148836
LLVM IR already allows floating point type in atomicrmw.
Update clang atomic fetch max/min builtins to accept
floating point type like we did for fetch add/sub.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150985
Fixes: SWDEV-401056
Update implementation status table for Date and Time Functions to include different targets.
Reviewed By: jeffbailey
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151809