Summary:
This diff is to support Debian packaging,
which sets various hardening-rleated flags
in CFLAGS. They don't make sense for Go,
so we just ignore them.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, axw
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11288
llvm-svn: 242513
basic changes to the IR such as folding pointers through PHIs, Selects,
integer casts, store/load pairs, or outlining.
This leaves the feature available behind a flag. This flag's default
could be flipped if necessary, but the real-world performance impact of
this particular feature of GMR may not be sufficiently significant for
many folks to want to run the risk.
Currently, the risk here is somewhat mitigated by half-hearted attempts
to update GlobalsModRef when the rest of the optimizer changes
something. However, I am currently trying to remove that update
mechanism as it makes migrating the AA infrastructure to a form that can
be readily shared between new and old pass managers very challenging.
Without this update mechanism, it is possible that this still unlikely
failure mode will start to trip people, and so I wanted to try to
proactively avoid that.
There is a lengthy discussion on the mailing list about why the core
approach here is flawed, and likely would need to look totally different
to be both reasonably effective and resilient to basic IR changes
occuring. This patch is essentially the first of two which will enact
the result of that discussion. The next patch will remove the current
update mechanism.
Thanks to lots of folks that helped look at this from different angles.
Especial thanks to Michael Zolotukhin for doing some very prelimanary
benchmarking of LTO without GlobalsModRef to get a rough idea of the
impact we could be facing here. So far, it looks very small, but there
are some concerns lingering from other benchmarking. The default here
may get flipped if performance results end up pointing at this as a more
significant issue.
Also thanks to Pete and Gerolf for reviewing!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11213
llvm-svn: 242512
In particular, it's much easier to read, as it doesn't expand all
the way on wide-screen displays.
CSS committed under LLVM license with explicit permission from
Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>.
llvm-svn: 242511
Since r230724 ("Skip promotable allocas to improve performance at -O0"), there is a regression in the generated debug info for those non-instrumented variables. When inspecting such a variable's value in LLDB, you often get garbage instead of the actual value. ASan instrumentation is inserted before the creation of the non-instrumented alloca. The only allocas that are considered standard stack variables are the ones declared in the first basic-block, but the initial instrumentation setup in the function breaks that invariant.
This patch makes sure uninstrumented allocas stay in the first BB.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11179
llvm-svn: 242510
We shouldn't crash despite the AMD64 ABI not giving clear guidance as to
how to pass around vector types <= 32 bits. Instead, classify such
vectors as INTEGER to be compatible with GCC.
This fixes PR24162.
llvm-svn: 242508
Guessing which file name to replace based on the -main-file-name
argument to -cc1 is flawed. Instead, keep track of which arguments are
inputs to each command.
llvm-svn: 242504
This is mostly done to disable the PostRAScheduler which optimizes for
instruction latencies which isn't a good fit for out-of-order
architectures. This also allows to leave out the itinerary table in
swift in favor of the SchedModel ones.
This change leads to performance improvements/regressions by as much as
10% in some benchmarks, in fact we loose 0.4% performance over the
llvm-testsuite for reasons that appear to be unknown or out of the
compilers control. rdar://20803802 documents the investigation of
these effects.
While it is probably a good idea to perform the same switch for the
other ARM out-of-order CPUs, I limited this change to swift as I cannot
perform the benchmark verification on the other CPUs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10513
llvm-svn: 242500
- introduces a new cc1 option -fmodule-format=[raw,obj]
with 'raw' being the default
- supports arbitrary module container formats that libclang is agnostic to
- adds the format to the module hash to avoid collisions
- splits the old PCHContainerOperations into PCHContainerWriter and
a PCHContainerReader.
Thanks to Richard Smith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 242499
Those new constructors make it more natural to construct an object for a function. For example, previously to build a LoopInfo for a function, we need four statements:
DominatorTree DT;
LoopInfo LI;
DT.recalculate(F);
LI.analyze(DT);
Now we only need one statement:
LoopInfo LI(DominatorTree(F));
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11274
llvm-svn: 242486
Summary: This corresponds to the change made in r237417 - "Doxygen: Enable autobrief feature and update coding standards."
Reviewers: eliben
Subscribers: eliben, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11281
llvm-svn: 242485
Constructing a name based on the function name didn't give us a unique
symbol if we had more than one setjmp in a function. Using
MCContext::createTempSymbol() always gives us a unique name.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9314
llvm-svn: 242482
llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp was used as part of the SjLj exception handling
style but is also used in clang to implement __builtin_setjmp. The ARM
backend needs to output additional dispatch tables for the SjLj
exception handling style, these tables however can't be emitted if
llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp is simply used for __builtin_setjmp and no actual
landing pad blocks exist.
To solve this issue a new llvm.eh.sjlj.setup_dispatch intrinsic is
introduced which is used instead of llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp in the SjLj
exception handling lowering, so we can differentiate between the case
where we actually need to setup a dispatch table and the case where we
just need the __builtin_setjmp semantic.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9313
llvm-svn: 242481
C11 leaves the choice on whether round-to-integer operations set the inexact
flag implementation-defined. Darwin does expect it to be set, but this seems to
be against the intent of the IEEE document and slower to implement anyway. So
it should be opt-in.
llvm-svn: 242446
I was looking at some vector code generation and kept seeing
unnecessary vector copies into the Altivec half of the VSX registers.
I discovered that we overlooked v4i32 when adding the register classes
for VSX; we only added v4f32 and v2f64. This means that anything that
canonicalizes into v4i32 (which is a LOT of stuff) ends up being
forced into VRRC on its way to VSRC.
The fix is one line. The rest of the patch is fixing up some test
cases whose code generation has changed as a result.
This seems like it would be a good candidate for backport to 3.7.
llvm-svn: 242442
Summary:
SpeculativeExecution enables a series straight line optimizations (such
as SLSR and NaryReassociate) on conditional code. For example,
if (...)
... b * s ...
if (...)
... (b + 1) * s ...
speculative execution can hoist b * s and (b + 1) * s from then-blocks,
so that we have
... b * s ...
if (...)
...
... (b + 1) * s ...
if (...)
...
Then, SLSR can rewrite (b + 1) * s to (b * s + s) because after
speculative execution b * s dominates (b + 1) * s.
The performance impact of this change is significant. It speeds up the
benchmarks running EigenFloatContractionKernelInternal16x16
(ba68f42fa6/unsupported/Eigen/CXX11/src/Tensor/TensorContractionCuda.h (cl-526))
by roughly 2%. Some internal benchmarks that have the above code pattern
are improved by up to 40%. No significant slowdowns are observed on
Eigen CUDA microbenchmarks.
Reviewers: jholewinski, broune, eliben
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11201
llvm-svn: 242437
This is a new iteration of the reverted r238793 /
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8232 which wrongly assumed that any and/or
trees can be represented by conditional compare sequences, however there
are some restrictions to that. This version fixes this and adds comments
that explain exactly what types of and/or trees can actually be
implemented as conditional compare sequences.
Related to http://llvm.org/PR20927, rdar://18326194
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10579
llvm-svn: 242436
