It turns out that whether the new handlers should be provided is orthogonal
to whether new/delete are provided in libc++ or libc++abi. The reason why
I initially added this conditional is because of an incorrect understanding
of the path we're taking when building on Apple platforms. In fact, we
always build libc++ on top of libc++abi on Apple platforms, so we take
the branch for `LIBCXX_BUILDING_LIBCXXABI` there.
llvm-svn: 358616
Some linker libraries are only needed for shared libc++, some only
for static libc++, combining these together in LIBCXX_LIBRARIES and
LIBCXX_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES can introduce unnecessary dependencies.
This changes splits those up into LIBCXX_SHARED_LIBRARIES and
LIBCXX_STATIC_LIBRARIES matching what libc++abi already does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57872
llvm-svn: 358614
Legalize things like i24 load/store by splitting them into smaller power of 2 operations.
This matches how SelectionDAG handles these operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59971
llvm-svn: 358613
Summary:
- for warnings, use the flag the warning is controlled by (-Wfoo)
- for errors, keep using the internal name (there's nothing better) but
drop the err_ prefix
This comes at the cost of uniformity, it's no longer totally obvious
exactly what the code field contains. But the -Wname flags are so much
more useful to end-users than the internal warn_foo that this seems worth it.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822
llvm-svn: 358611
In r358591, I added a test that uses the debug database from multiple
threads and that helped us uncover the problem that was fixed in r355367.
However, the test broke the tsan CI bots, and I think the problem is the
test allocator that was used in the test (which is not thread safe).
I'm committing again without using the test allocator, and in a separate
test file.
llvm-svn: 358610
For the following code snippet:
void builtin_function_call_crash_fixes(char *c) {
__builtin_strncpy(c, "", 6);
__builtin_memset(c, '\0', (0));
__builtin_memcpy(c, c, 0);
}
security.insecureAPI.DeprecatedOrUnsafeBufferHandling caused a regression, as it
didn't recognize functions starting with __builtin_. Fixed exactly that.
I wanted to modify an existing test file, but the two I found didn't seem like
perfect candidates. While I was there, I prettified their RUN: lines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59812
llvm-svn: 358609
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358607
Summary:
Typically used with umbrella headers, e.g. GTK:
#if !defined (__GTK_H_INSIDE__) && !defined (GTK_COMPILATION)
#error "Only <gtk/gtk.h> can be included directly."
#endif
Heuristic is fairly conservative, a quick code search over github showed
a fair number of hits and few/no false positives. (Not all were umbrella
headers, but I'd be happy avoiding include insertion for all of them).
We may want to relax the heuristic later to catch more cases.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60815
llvm-svn: 358605
We were using the LLDB-Info.plist as the canonical holder of the
version number, but there is really no good reason to do this. If
anything the plist should be generated using the information provided
to CMake.
For now just remove the logic extracting the version from the plist
and rely on LLDB_VERSION_STRING.
llvm-svn: 358604
Summary:
None of these derived classes do anything that the base class cannot.
If we remove these case statements, then the base class can handle them
just fine.
Reviewers: peter.smith, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60803
llvm-svn: 358603
Summary:
Otherwise, we can run into problems when the program has static variables
that need to use the debug database during their deinitialization, if
the debug DB has already been deinitialized.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60830
llvm-svn: 358602
Summary:
Reapply r357931 with fixes to ThinLTO testcases and llvm-lto tool.
ThinLTOCodeGenerator currently does not preserve llvm.used symbols and
it can internalize them. In order to pass the necessary information to the
legacy ThinLTOCodeGenerator, the input to the code generator is
rewritten to be based on lto::InputFile.
Now ThinLTO using the legacy LTO API will requires data layout in
Module.
"internalize" thinlto action in llvm-lto is updated to run both
"promote" and "internalize" with the same configuration as
ThinLTOCodeGenerator. The old "promote" + "internalize" option does not
produce the same output as ThinLTOCodeGenerator.
This fixes: PR41236
rdar://problem/49293439
Reviewers: tejohnson, pcc, kromanova, dexonsmith
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: ormris, bd1976llvm, mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60421
llvm-svn: 358601
In InstCombine, we use an idiom of "store i1 true, i1 undef" to indicate we've found a path which we've proven unreachable. We can't actually insert the unreachable instruction since that would require changing the CFG. We leave that to simplifycfg later.
This just factors out that idiom creation so we don't duplicate the same mostly undocument idiom creation in multiple places.
llvm-svn: 358600
If a branch is conditional on extractvalue(op.with.overflow(%x, C), 1)
then we can constrain the value of %x inside the branch based on
makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion(). We do this by extending the edge-value
handling in LVI. This allows CVP to then fold comparisons against %x,
as illustrated in the tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60650
llvm-svn: 358597
All target-parallel-based constructs can be run in SPMD mode from now
on. Even if num_threads clauses or if clauses are used, such constructs
can be executed in SPMD mode.
llvm-svn: 358595
This reverts r358591, which seems to have uncovered an actual bug and
causes the tsan CI to fail. We need to fix the bug and re-commit the
test.
llvm-svn: 358593
Summary: This fixes a large Dawn of War 3 performance regression with RADV from Mesa 19.0 to master which was caused by creating less code in some branches.
Reviewers: arsen, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60824
llvm-svn: 358592
Before this patch readability-misleading-indentation could issue diagnostics
with an invalid location, which would lead to an assertion failure in
ClangTidyContext::diag()
llvm-svn: 358589
This will change with the proposal in D60214.
Unfortunately, the triple is not supported for auto-generation
via script, and the multiple RUN lines have diffs on this test,
but I can't tell exactly what is required by this test.
PR7162 was an assert/crash, so hopefully, this is good enough.
llvm-svn: 358587
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
Summary:
This patch adds support for ULEB128 and SLEB128 encoding and decoding to
BinaryStreamWriter and BinaryStreamReader respectively.
Support for ULEB128/SLEB128 will be used for eh-frame parsing in the JITLink
library currently under development (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704).
Reviewers: zturner, dblaikie
Subscribers: kristina, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60810
llvm-svn: 358584
Currently there is a single point in ScheduleDAGRRList, where we
actually query the topological order (besides init code). Currently we
are recomputing the order after adding a node (which does not have
predecessors) and then we add predecessors edge-by-edge.
We can avoid adding edges one-by-one after we added a new node. In that case, we can
just rebuild the order from scratch after adding the edges to the DAG
and avoid all the updates to the ordering.
Also, we can delay updating the DAG until we query the DAG, if we keep a
list of added edges. Depending on the number of updates, we can either
apply them when needed or recompute the order from scratch.
This brings down the geomean compile time for of CTMark with -O1 down 0.3% on X86,
with no regressions.
Reviewers: MatzeB, atrick, efriedma, niravd, paquette
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60125
llvm-svn: 358583
Summary:
Add accessors for the file, directory, source file name (curiously, an `Optional` value?), of a DIFile.
This is intended to replace the LLVMValueRef-based accessors used in D52239
Reviewers: whitequark, jberdine, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark, jberdine
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60489
llvm-svn: 358577
Summary:
Motivation/Context: in the code review system integrating with clang-tidy,
clang-tidy doesn't provide a human-readable description of the fix. Usually
developers have to preview a code diff (before vs after apply the fix) to
understand what the fix does before applying a fix.
This patch proposes that each clang-tidy check provides a short and
actional fix description that can be shown in the UI, so that users can know
what the fix does without previewing diff.
This patch extends clang-tidy framework to support fix descriptions (will add implementations for
existing checks in the future). Fix descriptions and fixes are emitted via diagnostic::Note (rather than
attaching the main warning diagnostic).
Before this patch:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning") << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...);
}
```
After:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning"); // Emit a check warning
diag(loc, "fix description", DiagnosticIDs::Note) << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...); // Emit a diagnostic note and a fix
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59932
llvm-svn: 358576
On pre-AVX512 targets we can use MOVMSK to extract reduced boolean results. This is properly optimized, annoyingly AVX512 isn't and produces code that is almost as bad as the (unchanged) costs suggest......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60403
llvm-svn: 358574
Summary:
We do have some reports of include insertion behaving badly in some
codebases. Requiring header guards both makes sense in principle, and is
likely to disable this "nice-to-have" feature in codebases where headers don't
follow the expected pattern.
With this we can drop some other heuristics, such as looking at file
extensions to detect known non-headers - implementation files have no guards.
One wrinkle here is #import - objc headers may not have guards because
they're intended to be used via #import. If the header is the main file
or is #included, we won't collect locations - merge should take care of
this if we see the file #imported somewhere. Seems likely to be OK.
Headers which have a canonicalization (stdlib, IWYU) are exempt from this check.
*.inc files continue to be handled by looking up to the including file.
This patch also adds *.def here - tablegen wants this pattern too.
In terms of code structure, the division between SymbolCollector and
CanonicalIncludes has shifted: SymbolCollector is responsible for more.
This is because SymbolCollector has all the SourceManager/HeaderSearch access
needed for checking for guards, and we interleave these checks with the *.def
checks in a loop (potentially).
We could hand all the info into CanonicalIncludes and put the logic there
if that's preferable.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60316
llvm-svn: 358571
Summary:
This change takes the full list of bfd targets that lld supports (see `ScriptParser.cpp`), including generic handling for `*-freebsd` targets (which uses the same settings but with a FreeBSD OSABI). In particular this adds mips support for `--output-target` (but not yet via `--binary-architecture`).
lld and llvm-objcopy use their own different custom data structures, so I'd prefer to check this in as-is (add support directly in llvm-objcopy, including all the test coverage) and do a separate NFC patch(s) that consolidate the two by putting this mapping into libobject.
See [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41462 | PR41462 ]].
Reviewers: jhenderson, jakehehrlich, espindola, alexshap, arichardson
Reviewed By: arichardson
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, emaste, sdardis, krytarowski, atanasyan, llvm-commits, MaskRay, arichardson
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60773
llvm-svn: 358562
