Make it a static function RISCVISelLowering, the only place it
is used.
I think I'm going to make this return a fractional LMULs in some
cases so I'm sorting out where it should live before I start
making changes.
I encountered a project that uses llvm that passes "generic" by
default. While I could fix that project, I wouldn't be surprised
if other projects did something similar. So it seems like
a good idea to provide a better error here.
I've also added validation of the 64Bit feature against the
triple so that we can catch a mismatched CPU before failing in
a mysterious way. We can make it pretty far in isel because we
calculate XLenVT from the triple and use that to set up the legal
integer type.
Reviewed By: luismarques, khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98307
This refines how we determine which masks types are legal and adds
support for loads, stores, and all ones/zeros splats.
I left a fixme in store handling where I think we need to zero
extra bits if the type isn't a multiple of a byte. If I remember
right from X86 there was some case we could have a store of a
1, 2, or 4 bit mask and have a scalar zextload that then expected the
bits to be 0. Its tricky to zero the bits with RVV. We need to do
something like round VL up, zero a register, lower the VL back down,
then do a tail undisturbed move into the zero register. Another
option might be to generate a mask of 1/2/4 bits set with a VL of 8
and use that to mask off the bits.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96468
Define an option -riscv-vector-bits-max to specify the maximum vector
bits for vectorizer. Loop vectorizer will use the value to check if it
is safe to use the whole vector registers to vectorize the loop.
It is not the optimum solution for loop vectorizing for scalable vector.
It assumed the whole vector registers will be used to vectorize the code.
If it is possible, we should configure vl to do vectorize instead of
using whole vector registers.
We only consider LMUL = 1 in this patch.
This patch just an initial work for loop vectorizer for RISC-V Vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95659
This is an alternative to D95563.
This is modeled after a similar feature for AArch64's SVE that uses
predicated scalable vector instructions.a
Rather than use predication, this patch uses an explicit VL operand.
I've limited it to always use LMUL=1 for now, but we can improve this
in the future.
This requires a bunch of new ISD opcodes to carry the VL operand.
I think we can probably lower intrinsics to these ISD opcodes to
cut down on the size of the isel table. Which is why I've added
patterns for all integer/float types and not just LMUL=1.
I'm only testing one vector width right now, but the width is
programmable via the command line.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95705
- The goal of this patch is improve option compatible with RISCV-V GCC,
-mcpu support on GCC side will sent patch in next few days.
- -mtune only affect the pipeline model and non-arch/extension related
target feature, e.g. instruction fusion; in td file it called
TuneFeatures, which is introduced by X86 back-end[1].
- -mtune accept all valid option for -mcpu and extra alias processor
option, e.g. `generic`, `rocket` and `sifive-7-series`, the purpose is
option compatible with RISCV-V GCC.
- Processor alias for -mtune will resolve according the current target arch,
rv32 or rv64, e.g. `rocket` will resolve to `rocket-rv32` or `rocket-rv64`.
- Interaction between -mcpu and -mtune:
* -mtune has higher priority than -mcpu for pipeline model and
TuneFeatures.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89025
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
This reverts commit e9f22fd4293a65bcdcf1b18b91c72f63e5e9e45b.
When building with -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER="Thread", check-llvm has 70
failing tests with this revision, and 29 without this revision.
This patch generates TableGen descriptions for the specified register
banks which contain a list of register sizes corresponding to the
available HwModes. The appropriate size is used during codegen according
to the current HwMode. As this HwMode was not available on generation,
it is set upon construction of the RegisterBankInfo class. Targets
simply need to provide the HwMode argument to the
<target>GenRegisterBankInfo constructor.
The RISC-V RegisterBankInfo constructor has been updated accordingly
(plus an unused argument removed).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76007
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
This adds support for reserving GPRs such that the compiler will not
choose a register for register allocation. The implementation follows
the same design as for AArch64; each reserved register becomes a target
feature and used for getting the reserved registers for a given
MachineFunction. The backend checks that it does not need to write to
any reserved register; if it does a relevant error is generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67185
Summary:
This patch implements the `TargetInstrInfo::verifyInstruction` hook for RISC-V. Currently the hook verifies the machine instruction's immediate operands, to check if the immediates are within the expected bounds. Without the hook invalid immediates are not detected except when doing assembly parsing, so they are silently emitted (including being truncated when emitting object code).
The bounds information is specified in tablegen by using the `OperandType` definition, which sets the `MCOperandInfo`'s `OperandType` field. Several RISC-V-specific immediate operand types were created, which extend the `MCInstrDesc`'s `OperandType` `enum`.
To have the hook called with `llc` pass it the `-verify-machineinstrs` option. For Clang add the cmake build config `-DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=True`, or temporarily patch `TargetPassConfig::addVerifyPass`.
Review concerns:
- The patch adds immediate operand type checks that cover at least the base ISA. There are several other operand types for the C extension and one type for the F/D extensions that were left out of this initial patch because they introduced further design concerns that I felt were best evaluated separately.
- Invalid register classes (e.g. passing a GPR register where a GPRC is expected) are already caught, so were not included.
- This design makes the more abstract `MachineInstr` verification depend on MC layer definitions, which arguably is not the cleanest design, but is in line with how things are done in other parts of the target and LLVM in general.
- There is some duplication of logic already present in the `MCOperandPredicate`s. Since the `MachineInstr` and `MCInstr` notions of immediates are fundamentally different, this is currently necessary.
Reviewers: asb, lenary
Reviewed By: lenary
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67397
llvm-svn: 375006
The RISC-V ISA defines RV32E as an alternative "base" instruction set
encoding, that differs from RV32I by having only 16 rather than 32 registers.
This patch adds basic definitions for RV32E as well as MC layer support
(assembling, disassembling) and tests. The only supported ABI on RV32E is
ILP32E.
Add a new RISCVFeatures::validate() helper to RISCVUtils which can be called
from codegen or MC layer libraries to validate the combination of TargetTriple
and FeatureBitSet. Other targets have similar checks (e.g. erroring if SPE is
enabled on PPC64 or oddspreg + o32 ABI on Mips), but they either duplicate the
checks (Mips), or fail to check for both codegen and MC codepaths (PPC).
Codegen for the ILP32E ABI support and RV32E codegen are left for a future
patch/patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59470
llvm-svn: 356744
This patch adds proper handling of -target-abi, as accepted by llvm-mc and
llc. Lowering (codegen) for the hard-float ABIs will follow in a subsequent
patch. However, this patch does add MC layer support for the hard float and
RVE ABIs (emission of the appropriate ELF flags
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#-file-header).
ABI parsing must be shared between codegen and the MC layer, so we add
computeTargetABI to RISCVUtils. A warning will be printed if an invalid or
unrecognized ABI is given.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59023
llvm-svn: 355771
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This adds the minimum necessary to support codegen for simple ALU operations
on RV32. Prolog and epilog insertion, support for memory operations etc etc
follow in future patches.
Leave guessInstructionProperties=1 until https://reviews.llvm.org/D37065 is
reviewed and lands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29933
llvm-svn: 316188
