Teach AsmParser to check with Assembler for when evaluating constant
expressions. This improves the handing of preprocessor expressions
that must be resolved at parse time. This idiom can be found as
assembling-time assertion checks in source-level assemblers. Note that
this relies on the MCStreamer to keep sufficient tabs on Section /
Fragment information which the MCAsmStreamer does not. As a result the
textual output may fail where the equivalent object generation would
pass. This can most easily be resolved by folding the MCAsmStreamer
and MCObjectStreamer together which is planned for in a separate
patch.
Currently, this feature is only enabled for assembly input, keeping IR
compilation consistent between assembly and object generation.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, probinson, espindola, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: eraman, peter.smith, arichardson, jyknight, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45164
llvm-svn: 331218
This patch updates some code responsible the skip debug info to use
BasicBlock::instructionsWithoutDebug. I think this makes things slightly
simpler and more direct.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, chandlerc
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46253
llvm-svn: 331217
No need to waste space nor number MBBs differently if MF gets recreated.
Reviewers: qcolombet, stoklund, t.p.northover, bogner, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46078
llvm-svn: 331213
We need to split most of the scheduler classes by vector width to remove more of the InstRW overrides, this patch should make this easier/tidier by allowing us to pass the X86SchedWriteWidths wrapper to multi-width multiclasses and then split as required.
I've included fields for Scl (scalar float/double), MMX (MMX integer), XMM, YMM and ZMM widths. These fields mostly share the same classes but it should give us the flexibility that we may need in the future.
This patch has replaced a set of example SSE/AVX512 instruction cases but isn't exhaustive as it gets very noisy before we really need the functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46266
llvm-svn: 331208
Summary:
As discussed in D45733, we want to do this in InstCombine.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/LGk
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chandlerc, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45867
llvm-svn: 331205
This provides an optimized implementation of SADDO/SSUBO/UADDO/USUBO
as well as ADDCARRY/SUBCARRY on top of the new CC implementation.
In particular, multi-word arithmetic now uses UADDO/ADDCARRY instead
of the old ADDC/ADDE logic, which means we no longer need to use
"glue" links for those instructions. This also allows making full
use of the memory-based instructions like ALSI, which couldn't be
recognized due to limitations in the DAG matcher previously.
Also, the llvm.sadd.with.overflow et.al. intrinsincs now expand to
directly using the ADD instructions and checking for a CC 3 result.
llvm-svn: 331203
Currently, an instruction setting the condition code is linked to
the instruction using the condition code via a "glue" link in the
SelectionDAG. This has a number of drawbacks; in particular, it
means the same CC cannot be used by multiple users. It also makes
it more difficult to efficiently implement SADDO et. al.
This patch changes the back-end to represent CC dependencies as
normal values during SelectionDAG matching, along the lines of
how this is handled in the X86 back-end already.
In addition to the core mechanics of updating all relevant patterns,
this requires a number of additional changes:
- We now need to be able to spill/restore a CC value into a GPR
if necessary. This means providing a copyPhysReg implementation
for moves involving CC, and defining getCrossCopyRegClass.
- Since we still prefer to avoid such spills, we provide an override
for IsProfitableToFold to avoid creating a merged LOAD / ICMP if
this would result in multiple users of the CC.
- combineCCMask no longer requires a single CC user, and no longer
need to be careful about preventing invalid glue/chain cycles.
- emitSelect needs to be more careful in marking CC live-in to
the basic block it generates. Also, we can now optimize the
case of multiple subsequent selects with the same condition
just like X86 does.
llvm-svn: 331202
There are two separate fixes here:
* The lowering code for non-extending loads should report UnableToLegalize instead of emitting the same instruction.
* The target should not be requesting lowering of non-extending loads.
llvm-svn: 331201
This prevents infinite recursion in DWARFDie::findRecursively for
malformed DWARF where a DIE references itself.
This fixes PR36257.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43092
llvm-svn: 331200
This fixes PR37293.
We can have scheduling classes with no write latency entries, that still consume
processor resources. We don't want to treat those instructions as zero-latency
instructions; they still have to be issued to the underlying pipelines, so they
still consume resource cycles.
This is likely to be a regression which I have accidentally introduced at
revision 330807. Now, if an instruction has a non-empty set of write processor
resources, we conservatively treat it as a normal (i.e. non zero-latency)
instruction.
llvm-svn: 331193
In patterns where we need to specify a result VT, prefer
[(set (tr.vt tr.op:$V1), (operator ...))]
over
[(set tr.op:$V1, (tr.vt (operator ...)))]
This is NFC now, but simplifies some future changes.
llvm-svn: 331192
If we have LOCR instructions, select them directly from SelectionDAG
instead of first going through a pseudo instruction and then using
the custom inserter to emit the LOCR.
Provide Select pseudo-instructions for VR32/VR64 if we have vector
instructions, to avoid having to go through the first 16 FPRs
unnecessarily.
If we do not have LOCFHR, prefer using LOCR followed by a move
over a conditional branch.
llvm-svn: 331191
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Summary:
This patch will introduce copying of DBG_VALUE instructions
from an otherwise empty basic block to predecessor/successor
blocks in case the empty block is eliminated/bypassed. It
is currently only done in one identified situation in the
BranchFolding pass, before optimizing on empty block.
It can be seen as a light variant of the propagation done
by the LiveDebugValues pass, which unfortunately is executed
after the BranchFolding pass.
We only propagate (copy) DBG_VALUE instructions in a limited
number of situations:
a) If the empty BB is the only predecessor of a successor
we can copy the DBG_VALUE instruction to the beginning of
the successor (because the DBG_VALUE instruction is always
part of the flow between the blocks).
b) If the empty BB is the only successor of a predecessor
we can copy the DBG_VALUE instruction to the end of the
predecessor (because the DBG_VALUE instruction is always
part of the flow between the blocks). In this case we add
the DBG_VALUE just before the first terminator (assuming
that the terminators do not impact the DBG_VALUE).
A future solution, to handle more situations, could perhaps
be to run the LiveDebugValues pass before branch folding?
This fix is related to PR37234. It is expected to resolve
the problem seen, when applied together with the fix in
SelectionDAG from here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46129
Reviewers: #debug-info, aprantl, rnk
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Subscribers: ormris, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46184
llvm-svn: 331183
Summary:
When building the selection DAG at ISel all PHI nodes are
selected and lowered to Machine Instruction PHI nodes before
we start to create any SDNodes. So there are no SDNodes for
values produced by the PHI nodes.
In the past when selecting a dbg.value intrinsic that uses
the value produced by a PHI node we have been handling such
dbg.value intrinsics as "dangling debug info". I.e. we have
not created a SDDbgValue node directly, because there is
no existing SDNode for the PHI result, instead we deferred
the creationg of a SDDbgValue until we found the first use
of the PHI result.
The old solution had a couple of flaws. The position of the
selected DBG_VALUE instruction would end up quite late in a
basic block, and for example not directly after the PHI node
as in the LLVM IR input. And in case there were no use at all
in the basic block the dbg.value could be dropped completely.
This patch introduces a new VREG kind of SDDbgValue nodes.
It is similar to a SDNODE kind of node, but it refers directly
to a virtual register and not a SDNode. When we do selection
for a dbg.value that is using the result of a PHI node we
can do a lookup of the virtual register directly (as it already
is determined for the PHI node) and create a SDDbgValue node
immediately instead of delaying the selection until we find a
use.
This should fix a problem with losing debug info at ISel
as seen in PR37234 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37234).
It does not resolve PR37234 completely, because the debug info
is dropped later on in the BranchFolder (see D46184).
Reviewers: #debug-info, aprantl
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Subscribers: rnk, gbedwell, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46129
llvm-svn: 331182
This patch updates some code responsible the skip debug info to use
BasicBlock::instructionsWithoutDebug. I think this makes things
slightly simpler and more direct.
Reviewers: mkuper, rengolin, dcaballe, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46254
llvm-svn: 331174
The PMAXSD/PMINSD instregexs had been written as PMAX(C?)SD - looks like this was a search+replace error when matching float MAXSD/MINSD commutative instructions.
llvm-svn: 331167
Previously these instructions were unselectable and instead were generated
through the instruction mapping tables.
Reviewers: atanasyan, smaksimovic, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46055
llvm-svn: 331165
This patch extends the 'isSVEVectorRegWithShiftExtend' function to
improve diagnostics for SVE's gather load (scalar + vector) addressing
modes. Instead of always suggesting the 'unscaled' addressing mode,
the use of DiagnosticPredicate enables a more specific error message
in the context where the scaling is incorrect. For example:
ld1h z0.d, p0/z, [x0, z0.d, lsl #2]
^
shift amount should be '1'
Instead of suggesting the packed, unscaled addressing mode:
expected 'z[0..31].d, (uxtw|sxtw)'
the assembler now suggests using the proper scaling:
expected 'z[0..31].d, (lsl|uxtw|sxtw) #1'
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46124
llvm-svn: 331162
The instructions have predicates of Not64BitMode, but there are identical strings in InstAliases that have Mode32Bit and Mode16Bit. But the ordering is uncontrolled and the less specific Not64BitMode was ordered first.
This patch hides the Not64BitMode from the table so there is no conflict anymore.
llvm-svn: 331158
These aliases are used to default the memory forms of call and jmp to the size of the operating mode. This doesn't work for Intel syntax. We have a different hack in the AsmParser code itself to force a size on unsized memory operands.
llvm-svn: 331153
Most of the add<operandname>Operands() functions are the same
and can be replaced by using a single 'RenderMethod' in
the AArch64InstrFormats.td file. Since many of the scaled
immediates (with different scaling/bits) are the same, most of
these can reuse the same AsmOperandClass.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, samparker, SjoerdMeijer, javed.absar
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46122
llvm-svn: 331146
