Including following 14 instructions:
4 ld1 insts: load multiple 1-element structure to sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
ld2/ld3/ld4: load multiple N-element structure to sequential N registers (N=2,3,4).
4 st1 insts: store multiple 1-element structure from sequential 1/2/3/4 registers.
st2/st3/st4: store multiple N-element structure from sequential N registers (N = 2,3,4).
llvm-svn: 192352
When we had a sequence like:
s1 = VLDRS [r0, 1], Q0<imp-def>
s3 = VLDRS [r0, 2], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
s0 = VLDRS [r0, 0], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
s2 = VLDRS [r0, 4], Q0<imp-use,kill>, Q0<imp-def>
we were gathering the {s0, s1} loads below the s3 load. This is fine,
but confused the verifier since now the s3 load had Q0<imp-use> with
no definition above it.
This should mark such uses <undef> as well. The liveness structure at
the beginning and end of the block is unaffected, and the true sN
definitions should prevent any dodgy reorderings being introduced
elsewhere.
rdar://problem/15124449
llvm-svn: 192344
This reverts commit r192316. The original change introduced circular
dependencies between libTarget and backends. That would broke a build unless
link everything into one big binary.
llvm-svn: 192329
Making them proper functions defined in the (shared)lib instead of
static inlines defined in the header files makes it possible to
actually distribute a binary compiled against the shared library
without having to worry about getting undefined symbol errors when
calling e.g LLVMInitializeAllTargetInfos because the shared library on
the other system was compiled with different targets.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1714
llvm-svn: 192316
If a function seen at compile time is not necessarily the one linked to
the binary being built, it is illegal to change the actual arguments
passing to it.
e.g.
--------------------------
void foo(int lol) {
// foo() has linkage satisifying isWeakForLinker()
// "lol" is not used at all.
}
void bar(int lo2) {
// xform to foo(undef) is illegal, as compiler dose not know which
// instance of foo() will be linked to the the binary being built.
foo(lol2);
}
-----------------------------
Such functions can be captured by isWeakForLinker(). NOTE that
mayBeOverridden() is insufficient for this purpose as it dosen't include
linkage types like AvailableExternallyLinkage and LinkOnceODRLinkage.
Take link_odr* as an example, it indicates a set of *EQUIVALENT* globals
that can be merged at link-time. However, the semantic of
*EQUIVALENT*-functions includes parameters. Changing parameters breaks
the assumption.
Thank John McCall for help, especially for the explanation of subtle
difference between linkage types.
rdar://11546243
llvm-svn: 192302
Substantial SelectionDAG scheduling is going away soon, and is
interfering with Hao's attempts to implement LDn/STn instructions, so
I say we make the leap first.
There were a few reorderings (inevitably) which broke some tests. I
tried to replace them with CHECK-DAG variants mostly, but some too
complex for that to be useful and I just reordered them.
llvm-svn: 192282
This was only working because AVX had cheaper rules in all cases.
I'm sure there are other places in this file where predicates are missing.
llvm-svn: 192276
Sadly this loses the checking from AssertingVH, but apparently storing the
end() of a BasicBlock into an AssertingVH has bad consequences as it's not
really an instruction.
llvm-svn: 192209
