If two coverage segments cover the same area we need to combine them,
as per r218432. OTOH, just because they start at the same place
doesn't mean they cover the same area. This fixes the check to be more
exact about this.
This is pretty hard to test right now. The frontend doesn't currently
emit regions that start at the same place but don't overlap, but some
upcoming work changes this.
llvm-svn: 227017
This patch was generated by a clang tidy checker that is being open sourced.
The documentation of that checker is the following:
/// The emptiness of a container should be checked using the empty method
/// instead of the size method. It is not guaranteed that size is a
/// constant-time function, and it is generally more efficient and also shows
/// clearer intent to use empty. Furthermore some containers may implement the
/// empty method but not implement the size method. Using empty whenever
/// possible makes it easier to switch to another container in the future.
Patch by Gábor Horváth!
llvm-svn: 226161
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
This teaches CoverageMapping::getCoveredFunctions to filter to a
particular file and uses that to replace most of the logic found in
llvm-cov report.
llvm-svn: 221962
Every time we were adding or removing an expression when generating a
coverage mapping we were doing a linear search to try and deduplicate
the list. The indices in the list are important, so we can't just
replace it by a DenseMap entirely, but an auxilliary DenseMap for fast
lookup massively improves the performance issues I was seeing here.
llvm-svn: 218892
When I was preparing r218879 for commit, I removed an early return
that I decided was just noise. It wasn't. This is r218879 no-crash
edition.
This reverts commit r218881, reapplying r218879.
llvm-svn: 218887
The Terms vector here represented a polynomial of of all possible
counters, and is used to simplify expressions when generating coverage
mapping. There are a few problems with this:
1. Keeping the vector as a member is wasteful, since we clear it every
time we use it.
2. Most expressions refer to a subset of the counters, so we end up
iterating over a large number of zeros doing nothing a lot of the
time.
This updates the user of the vector to store the terms locally, and
uses a sort and combine approach so that we only operate on counters
that are actually used in a given expression. For small cases this
makes very little difference, but in cases with a very large number of
counted regions this is a significant performance fix.
llvm-svn: 218879
This commit fixes llvm-cov's function coverage metric by using the number of executed functions instead of the number of fully covered functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5196
llvm-svn: 218672
If we have multiple coverage counts for the same segment, we need to
add them up rather than arbitrarily choosing one. This fixes that and
adds a test with template instantiations to exercise it.
llvm-svn: 218432
This splits the logic for actually looking up coverage information
from the logic that displays it. These were tangled rather thoroughly
so this change is a bit large, but it mostly consists of moving things
around. The coverage lookup logic itself now lives in the library,
rather than being spread between the library and the tool.
llvm-svn: 218184
This patch implements the data structures, the reader and
the writers for the new code coverage mapping system.
The new code coverage mapping system uses the instrumentation
based profiling to provide code coverage analysis.
llvm-svn: 213910
Benjamin Kramer