are in fact identity operations. We detect these and kill their
partitions so that even splitting is unaffected by them. This is
particularly important because Clang relies on emitting identity memcpy
operations for struct copies, and these fold away to constants very
often after inlining.
Fixes the last big performance FIXME I have on my plate.
llvm-svn: 165285
the rewrite visitor to make the fact that the speculation is completely
independent a bit more clear.
I promise that this is just a cut/paste of the one visitor and adding
the annonymous namespace wrappings. The diff may look completely
preposterous, it does in git for some reason.
llvm-svn: 165284
Make sure functions located in user specified text sections (via the
section attribute) are located together with the default text sections.
Otherwise, for large object files, the relocations for call instructions
are more likely to be out of range. This becomes even more likely in the
presence of LTO.
rdar://12402636
llvm-svn: 165254
a) frame setup instructions define the prologue
b) we shouldn't change our location mid-stream
Add a test to make sure that the stack adjustment stays within
the prologue.
llvm-svn: 165250
- Add 'HwEncoding' for X86 registers and call getEncodingValue() to
retrieve their encoding values.
- This's the first step to adopt new scheme. Furthur revising is onging.
llvm-svn: 165241
"Instruction 'foo' has no tokens" errors during llvm-tblgen
-gen-asm-matcher attempts. At this time, the added
tokens are "#comment" style rather than the actual mnemonic. This will
be revisited once the rest of the base asmparser bits get straightened
out for ppc64-elf-linux.
llvm-svn: 165237
We conservatively only check the first use to avoid walking long use chains.
This catches the common case of having both a load and a store to a pointer
supplied by a PHI node.
llvm-svn: 165232
cpyDest can be mutated in some cases, which would then cause a crash later if
indeed the memory was underaligned. This brought down several buildbots, so
I guess the underaligned case is much more common than I thought!
llvm-svn: 165228
Currently, we re-visit allocas when something changes about the way they
might be *split* to allow better scalarization to take place. However,
we weren't handling the case when the *promotion* is what would change
the behavior of SROA. When an address derived from an alloca is stored
into another alloca, we consider the first to have escaped. If the
second is ever promoted to an SSA value, we will suddenly be able to run
the SROA pass on the first alloca.
This patch adds explicit support for this form if iteration. When we
detect a store of a pointer derived from an alloca, we flag the
underlying alloca for reprocessing after promotion. The logic works hard
to only do this when there is definitely going to be promotion and it
might remove impediments to the analysis of the alloca.
Thanks to Nick for the great test case and Benjamin for some sanity
check review.
llvm-svn: 165223
was less aligned than the old. In the testcase this results in an overaligned
memset: the memset alignment was correct for the original memory but is too much
for the new memory. Fix this by either increasing the alignment of the new
memory or bailing out if that isn't possible. Should fix the gcc-4.7 self-host
buildbot failure.
llvm-svn: 165220
Sorry for this being broken so long. =/
As part of this, switch all of the existing tests to be Little Endian,
which is the behavior I was asserting in them anyways! Add in a new
big-endian test that checks the interesting behavior there.
Another part of this is to tighten the rules abotu when we perform the
full-integer promotion. This logic now rejects cases where there fully
promoted integer is a non-multiple-of-8 bitwidth or cases where the
loads or stores touch bits which are in the allocated space of the
alloca but are not loaded or stored when accessing the integer. Sadly,
these aren't really observable today as the rest of the pass will
already ensure the invariants hold. However, the latter situation is
likely to become a potential concern in the future.
Thanks to Benjamin and Duncan for early review of this patch. I'm still
looking into whether there are further endianness issues, please let me
know if anyone sees BE failures persisting past this.
llvm-svn: 165219
macro instruction (li) in the assembler.
We have identified three possible expansions depending on
the size of immediate operand:
1) for 0 ≤ j ≤ 65535.
li d,j =>
ori d,$zero,j
2) for −32768 ≤ j < 0.
li d,j =>
addiu d,$zero,j
3) for any other value of j that is representable as a 32-bit integer.
li d,j =>
lui d,hi16(j)
ori d,d,lo16(j)
All of the above have been implemented in ths patch.
Contributer: Vladimir Medic
llvm-svn: 165199
