with fix: edited invalid-section-index2.elf input to pass the new check and
fail on the same place it was intended to fail.
Original commit message:
Elf.h already has code checking that section table does not go past end of file.
Problem is that this check may not work on values greater than UINT64_MAX / Header->e_shentsize
because of calculation overflow.
Parch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25432
llvm-svn: 285586
This patch implements two changes:
- Move processor feature definition into a new file SystemZFeatures.td,
and provide explicit lists of supported and unsupported features for
each level of the z/Architecture. This allows specifying unsupported
features in the scheduler definition files for each processor.
- Add optional aliases for the -mcpu processor names according to the
level of the z/Architecture, for compatibility with other compilers
on the platform. The supported aliases are:
-mcpu=arch8 equals -mcpu=z10
-mcpu=arch9 equals -mcpu=z196
-mcpu=arch10 equals -mcpu=zEC12
-mcpu=arch11 equals -mcpu=z13
llvm-svn: 285577
The LEFR/LFER pseudos are aliases for vector instructions and should
therefore be guared by FeatureVector. If they aren't, the TableGen
scheduler definition checking might complain that there is no data
for those pseudos for pre-z13 machines.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 285576
Currently, when using an instruction that is not supported on the
currently selected architecture, the LLVM assembler is likely to
diagnose an "invalid operand" instead of a "missing feature".
This is because many operands require a custom parser in order to
be processed correctly, and if an instruction is not available
according to the current feature set, the generated parser code
will also not detect the associated custom operand parsers.
Fixed by temporarily enabling all features while parsing operands.
The missing features will then be correctly detected when actually
parsing the instruction itself.
llvm-svn: 285575
LLVM currently treats the first operand of MVCK as if it were a
regular base+index+displacement address. However, it is in fact
a base+displacement combined with a length register field.
While the two might look syntactically similar, there are two
semantic differences:
- %r0 is a valid length register, even though it cannot be used
as an index register.
- In an expression with just a single register like 0(%rX), the
register is treated as base with normal addresses, while it is
treated as the length register (with an empty base) for MVCK.
Fixed by adding a new operand parser class BDRAddr and reworking
the assembler parser to distinguish between address + length
register operands and regular addresses.
llvm-svn: 285574
There is a bug describing poor cost model for floating point operations:
Bug 29083 - [X86][SSE] Improve costs for floating point operations. This
patch is the second one in series of patches dealing with cost model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25722
llvm-svn: 285564
possible pointer-wrap-around concerns, in some cases.
Before this patch, collectConstStridedAccesses (part of interleaved-accesses
analysis) called getPtrStride with [Assume=false, ShouldCheckWrap=true] when
examining all candidate pointers. This is too conservative. Instead, this
patch makes collectConstStridedAccesses use an optimistic approach, calling
getPtrStride with [Assume=true, ShouldCheckWrap=false], and then, once the
candidate interleave groups have been formed, revisits the pointer-wrapping
analysis but only where it matters: namely, in groups that have gaps, and where
the gaps are not at the very end of the group (in which case the loop is
peeled). This second time getPtrStride is called with [Assume=false,
ShouldCheckWrap=true], but this could further be improved to using Assume=true,
once we also add the logic to track that we are not going to meet the scev
runtime checks threshold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25276
llvm-svn: 285517
This removes a couple tablegen classes that become unused after this change. Another class gained an additional parameter to allow PMADDUBSW to specify a different result type from its input type.
llvm-svn: 285515
Summary:
Instead of using the workaround of suppressing the entire index for
modules that call inline asm that may reference locals, use the
NoRename flag on the summary for any locals in the llvm.used set, and
add a reference edge from any functions containing inline asm.
This avoids issues from having no summaries despite the module defining
global values, which was preventing more aggressive index-based
optimization. It will be followed by a subsequent patch to make a
similar fix for local references in module level asm (to fix PR30610).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26121
llvm-svn: 285513
Summary:
When we have an aliasee that is linkonce, while we can't convert
the non-prevailing copies to available_externally, we still need to
convert the prevailing copy to weak. If a reference to the aliasee
is exported, not converting a copy to weak will result in undefined
references when the linkonce is removed in its original module.
Add a new test and update existing tests.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26076
llvm-svn: 285512
Summary:
Replace the check of whether a GV has a section with the flag check
in the summary. This is in preparation for using the NoPromote flag
to convey other situations when we can't promote (e.g. locals used in
inline asm).
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26063
llvm-svn: 285507
Try harder to detect obfuscated min/max patterns: the initial pattern was added with D9352 / rL236202.
There was a bug fix for PR27137 at rL264996, but I think we can do better by folding the corresponding
smax pattern and commuted variants.
The codegen tests demonstrate the effect of ValueTracking on the backend via SelectionDAGBuilder. We
can't expose these differences minimally in IR because we don't have smin/smax intrinsics for IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26091
llvm-svn: 285499
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
This looked like this had caused compile time regressions on some buildbots (and was reverted in rL285381), but appears to have just been a harmless bystander!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285494
- Fix doxygen file comment
- reduce indentation in loop
- Factor out some common subexpressions
- Move independent helper function out of class
- Fix Changed flag (this is not strictly NFC but a bugfix, but the flag
seems ignored anyway)
llvm-svn: 285488
This resubmits r284436 and r284437, which were reverted in
r284462 as they were breaking the AArch64 buildbot.
The breakage on AArch64 turned out to be a miscompile which is
still not fixed, but is actively tracked at llvm.org/pr30748.
This resubmission re-writes the code in a way so as to make the
miscompile not happen.
llvm-svn: 285483
Instead of asserting that the shift count is != 0 we just bail out
as it's not profitable trying to optimize a node which will be
removed anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26098
llvm-svn: 285480
Summary:
Flat instruction can return out of order, so we need always need to wait
for all the outstanding flat operations.
Reviewers: tony-tye, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25998
llvm-svn: 285479
