Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
This moves the isMask and isShiftedMask functions to be class methods. They now use the MathExtras.h function for single word size and leading/trailing zeros/ones or countPopulation for the multiword size. The previous implementation made multiple temorary memory allocations to do the bitwise arithmetic operations to match the MathExtras.h implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31565
llvm-svn: 299362
This patch is one step to attempt to unify the main APInt interface and the tc functions used by APFloat.
This patch adds a WordType to APInt and uses that in all the tc functions. I've added temporary typedefs to APFloat to alias it to integerPart to keep the patch size down. I'll work on removing that in a future patch.
In future patches I hope to reuse the tc functions to implement some of the main APInt functionality.
I may remove APINT_ from BITS_PER_WORD and WORD_SIZE constants so that we don't have the repetitive APInt::APINT_ externally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31523
llvm-svn: 299341
This removes a parameter from the routine that was responsible for a lot of the issue. It was a bit count that had to be set to the BitWidth of the APInt and would get passed to getLowBitsSet. This guaranteed the call to getLowBitsSet would create an all ones value. This was then compared to (V | (V-1)). So the only shifted masks we detected had to have the MSB set.
The one in tree user is a transform in InstCombine that never fires due to earlier transforms covering the case better. I've submitted a patch to remove it completely, but for now I've just adapted it to the new interface for isShiftedMask.
llvm-svn: 299273
Did you know that 0 is a shifted mask? But 0x0000ff00 and 0x000000ff aren't? At least we get 0xff000000 right.
I only see one usage of this function in the code base today and its in InstCombine. I think its protected against 0 being misreported as a mask. I guess we just don't have tests for the missed cases.
llvm-svn: 299187
We currently have to insert bits via a temporary variable of the same size as the target with various shift/mask stages, resulting in further temporary variables, all of which require the allocation of memory for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64).
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::insertBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation and masks/inserts the raw bits directly into the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30780
llvm-svn: 297458
This extends an earlier change that did similar for add and sub operations.
With this first patch we lose the fastpath for the single word case as operator&= and friends don't support it. This can be added there if we think that's important.
I had to change some functions in the APInt class since the operator overloads were moved out of the class and can't be used inside the class now. The getBitsSet change collides with another outstanding patch to implement it with setBits. But I didn't want to make this patch dependent on that series.
I've also removed the Or, And, Xor functions which were rarely or never used. I already commited two changes to remove the only uses of Or that existed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30612
llvm-svn: 297121
We currently have methods to set a specified number of low bits, a specified number of high bits, or a range of bits. But looking at some existing code it seems sometimes we want to set the high bits starting from a certain bit. Currently we do this with something like getHighBits(BitWidth, BitWidth - StartBit). Or once we start switching to setHighBits, setHighBits(BitWidth - StartBit) or setHighBits(getBitWidth() - StartBit).
Particularly for the latter case it would be better to have a convenience method like setBitsFrom(StartBit) so we don't need to mention the bit width that's already known to the APInt object.
I considered just making setBits have a default value of UINT_MAX for the hiBit argument and we would internally MIN it with the bit width. So if it wasn't specified it would be treated as bit width. This would require removing the assertion we currently have on the value of hiBit and may not be as readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30602
llvm-svn: 297114
This patch implements getLowBitsSet/getHighBitsSet/getBitsSet in terms of the new setLowBits/setHighBits/setBits methods by making an all 0s APInt and then calling the appropriate set method.
This also adds support to setBits to allow loBits/hiBits to be in the other order to match with getBitsSet behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30563
llvm-svn: 297112
Summary:
There are quite a few places in the code base that do something like the following to set the high or low bits in an APInt.
KnownZero |= APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth - 1);
For BitWidths larger than 64 this creates a short lived APInt with malloced storage. I think it might even call malloc twice. Its better to just provide methods that can set the necessary bits without the temporary APInt.
I'll update usages that benefit in a separate patch.
Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB, davide, RKSimon, hans
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30525
llvm-svn: 297111
Summary:
This makes operator~ take the APInt by value so if it came from a temporary APInt the move constructor will get invoked and it will be able to reuse the memory allocation from the temporary.
This is similar to what was already done for 2s complement negation.
Reviewers: hans, davide, RKSimon
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30614
llvm-svn: 296997
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296272
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296147
The current pattern for extract bits in range is typically:
Mask.lshr(BitOffset).trunc(SubSizeInBits);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation of memory for the temporary variable.
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::extractBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30336
llvm-svn: 296141
The current pattern for setting bits in range is typically:
Mask |= APInt::getBitsSet(MaskSizeInBits, LoPos, HiPos);
Which can be particularly slow for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64) as they require the allocation memory for the temporary variable.
This is one of the key compile time issues identified in PR32037.
This patch adds the APInt::setBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation completely, this first implementation uses setBit() internally instead but already significantly reduces the regression in PR32037 (~10% drop). Additional optimization may be possible.
I investigated whether there is need for APInt::clearBits() and APInt::flipBits() equivalents but haven't seen these patterns to be particularly common, but reusing the code would be trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30265
llvm-svn: 296102
Summary: As per title. I ran into that limitation of the API doing some other work, so I though that'd be a nice addition.
Reviewers: jroelofs, compnerd, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29503
llvm-svn: 294063
Summary:
There's a comment in XorSlowCase that says "0^0==1" which isn't true. 0 xored with 0 is still 0. So I don't think we need to clear any unused bits here.
Now there is no difference between XorSlowCase and AndSlowCase/OrSlowCase other than the operation being performed
Reviewers: majnemer, MatzeB, chandlerc, bkramer
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: chfast, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28986
llvm-svn: 292873
This adds versions of operator + and - which are optimized for the LHS/RHS of the
operator being RValue's. When an RValue is available, we can use its storage space
instead of allocating new space.
On code such as ConstantRange which makes heavy use of APInt's over 64-bits in size,
this results in significant numbers of saved allocations.
Thanks to David Blaikie for all the review and most of the code here.
llvm-svn: 276470
APInt::slt was copying the LHS and RHS in to temporaries then making
them unsigned so that it could use an unsigned comparision. It did
this even on the paths which were trivial to give results for, such
as the sign bit of the LHS being set while RHS was not set.
This changes the logic to return out immediately in the trivial cases,
and use an unsigned comparison in the remaining cases. But this time,
just use the unsigned comparison directly without creating any temporaries.
This works because, for example:
true = (-2 slt -1) = (0xFE ult 0xFF)
Also added some tests explicitly for slt with APInt's larger than 64-bits
so that this new code is tested.
Using the memory for 'opt -O2 verify-uselistorder.lto.opt.bc -o opt.bc'
(see r236629 for details), this reduces the number of allocations from
26.8M to 23.9M.
llvm-svn: 270881
Summary:
This patch changes the way APInt is compared with a value of type uint64_t.
Before the uint64_t value was truncated to the size of APInt before comparison.
Now the comparison takes into account full 64-bit precision.
Test Plan: Unit tests added. No regressions. Self-hosted check-all done as well.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10655
llvm-svn: 241204
Summary: This patch fixes step D4 of Knuth's division algorithm implementation. Negative sign of the step result was not always detected due to incorrect "borrow" handling.
Test Plan: Unit test that reveals the bug included.
Reviewers: chandlerc, yaron.keren
Reviewed By: yaron.keren
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9196
llvm-svn: 235699
APInt uses Knuth's D algorithm for long division. In rare cases the
implementation applied a transformation that was not needed.
Added unit tests for long division. KnuthDiv() procedure is fully covered.
There is a case in APInt::divide() that I believe is never used (marked with
a comment) as all users of divide() handle trivial cases earlier.
Patch by Pawel Bylica!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8448
llvm-svn: 233312
It's not clear what the semantics of a self-move should be. The
consensus appears to be that a self-move should leave the object in a
moved-from state, which is what our existing move assignment operator
does.
However, the MSVC 2013 STL will perform self-moves in some cases. In
particular, when doing a std::stable_sort of an already sorted APSInt
vector of an appropriate size, one of the merge steps will self-move
half of the elements.
We don't notice this when building with MSVC, because MSVC will not
synthesize the move assignment operator for APSInt. Presumably MSVC
does this because APInt, the base class, has user-declared special
members that implicitly delete move special members. Instead, MSVC
selects the copy-assign operator, which defends against self-assignment.
Clang, on the other hand, selects the move-assign operator, and we get
garbage APInts.
llvm-svn: 215478
