making all of CallInst's low-level operand accessors
private
If you get compile errors I strongly urge you to
update your code.
I tried to write the necessary clues into the
header where the compiler may point to, but no
guarantees. It works for my GCC.
You have several options to update your code:
- you can use the v2.8 ArgOperand accessors
- you can go via a temporary CallSite
- you can upcast to, say, User and call its
low-level accessors if your code is definitely
operand-order agnostic.
If you run into serious problems, please
comment in below thread (and back out this
revision only if absolutely necessary):
<http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/64650cf343b28271>
llvm-svn: 107667
This way *only* debug sections can be discarded, but not the opposite. Seems like the copy-and-pasto from ELF code, since there it contains the reverse flag ('alloc').
llvm-svn: 107658
the example in the testcase, we now generate:
_test1: ## @test1
movss 4(%esp), %xmm0
addss 8(%esp), %xmm0
movl 12(%esp), %eax
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
ret
instead of:
_test1: ## @test1
subl $20, %esp
movl 24(%esp), %eax
movq %mm0, (%esp)
movq %mm0, 8(%esp)
movss (%esp), %xmm0
addss 12(%esp), %xmm0
movss %xmm0, (%eax)
addl $20, %esp
ret
v2f32 support did not work reliably because most of the X86
backend didn't know it was legal. It was apparently only added
to support returning source-level v2f32 values in MMX registers
in x86-32 mode. If ABI compatibility is important on this
GCC-extended-vector type for some reason, then the frontend
should generate IR that returns v2i32 instead of v2f32. However,
we generally don't try very hard to be abi compatible on gcc
extended vectors.
llvm-svn: 107601
v2f32 as legal in 32-bit mode. It is just as terrible there,
but I just care about x86-64 and noone claims it is valuable
in 64-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 107600
second round of low-level interface squeeze-out:
making all of CallInst's low-level operand accessors
private
If you get compile errors I strongly urge you to
update your code.
I tried to write the necessary clues into the
header where the compiler may point to, but no
guarantees. It works for my GCC.
You have several options to update your code:
- you can use the v2.8 ArgOperand accessors
- you can go via a temporary CallSite
- you can upcast to, say, User and call its
low-level accessors if your code is definitely
operand-order agnostic.
If you run into serious problems, please
comment in below thread (and back out this
revision only if absolutely necessary):
<http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/64650cf343b28271>
llvm-svn: 107580
