56890 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Renato Golin
b4d299c31b Revert r344172: [LV] Add a new reduction pattern match
This patch has caused fast-math issues in the reduction pattern.

Will re-work and land again.

llvm-svn: 345465
2018-10-27 22:13:43 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
054071c5ba AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev
1a55ca0270 [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
c5e27dc6bc Revert "DebugInfo: reduce DIE range verification on object files"
This reverts commits r345441 and r345444, they were causing msan
buildbot failures.

llvm-svn: 345457
2018-10-27 17:39:13 +00:00
Florian Hahn
0cc56f7cae [Local] Keep K's range if K does not move when combining metadata.
As K has to dominate I, IIUC I's range metadata must be a subset of
K's. After Eli's recent clarification to the LangRef, loading a value
outside of the range is undefined behavior.
Therefore if I's range contains elements outside of K's range and we would load
one such value, K would cause undefined behavior.

In cases like hoisting/sinking, we still want the most generic range
over all code paths to/from the hoist/sink point. As suggested in the
patches related to D47339, I will refactor the handling of those
scenarios and try to decouple it from this function as follow up, once
we switched to a similar handling of metadata in most of
combineMetadata.

I updated some tests checking mostly the merging of metadata to keep the
metadata of to dominating load. The most interesting one is probably test8 in
test/Transforms/JumpThreading/thread-loads.ll. It contained a comment
about the alias metadata preventing us to eliminate the branch, but it
seem like the actual problem currently is that we merge the ranges of
both loads and cannot eliminate the icmp afterwards. With this patch, we
manage to eliminate the icmp, as the range of the first load excludes 8.

Reviewers: efriedma, nlopes, davide

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51629

llvm-svn: 345456
2018-10-27 16:53:45 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
a70b9bb670 [x86] make test immune to improved extraction in D53784; NFC
llvm-svn: 345455
2018-10-27 16:46:10 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
0fcb066294 Regenerate FP_TO_INT tests.
Precursor to fix for PR17686

llvm-svn: 345453
2018-10-27 15:00:38 +00:00
Sanjin Sijaric
b45305d59c [ARM64][Windows] MCLayer support for exception handling
Add ARM64 unwind codes to MCLayer, as well SEH directives that will be emitted
by the frame lowering patch to follow.  We only emit unwind codes into object
object files for now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50166

llvm-svn: 345450
2018-10-27 06:13:06 +00:00
Craig Topper
a12c9f13c1 [X86] Add some isel patterns for scalar_to_vector/extract_vector_element that use the avx512 extended register classes when they are available.
llvm-svn: 345448
2018-10-27 05:35:20 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool
216b3006f5 test: add missing -triple
Ensure that the test builds for x86_64 as it is an assembly test.  This
should repair the buildbots.

llvm-svn: 345444
2018-10-27 02:27:38 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool
f2875b0f69 DebugInfo: reduce DIE range verification on object files
Relocatable content may have overlapping ranges until the sections are
finalized.  This reduces the amount of verification that is done on an object
file so that invalid errors are not raised.

llvm-svn: 345441
2018-10-27 00:49:33 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere
0484fccc7a Further split cpus test
On GreenDragon, CodeGen/X86/cpus-no-x86_64.ll was still timing out even
after breaking up the original test. I further split off the intel and
AMD cpus which hopefully resolves this.

http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-cmake-RgSan/

llvm-svn: 345438
2018-10-26 23:50:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
0d876d484e [x86] adjust tests to preserve behavior; NFC
I'm planning a binop optimization that would subvert the 
domain forcing ops in these tests, so turning them into
zexts.

llvm-svn: 345437
2018-10-26 23:06:28 +00:00
Leonard Chan
d9e13c18a9 Revert "[PassManager/Sanitizer] Enable usage of ported AddressSanitizer passes with -fsanitize=address"
This reverts commit 8d6af840396f2da2e4ed6aab669214ae25443204 and commit
b78d19c287b6e4a9abc9fb0545de9a3106d38d3d which causes slower build times
by initializing the AddressSanitizer on every function run.

The corresponding revisions are https://reviews.llvm.org/D52814 and
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52739.

llvm-svn: 345433
2018-10-26 22:51:51 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
b34960fe47 [ValueTracking] peek through shuffles in ComputeNumSignBits (PR37549)
The motivating case is from PR37549:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37549

The analysis improvement allows us to form a vector 'select' out of 
bitwise logic (the use of ComputeNumSignBits was added at rL345149).

The smaller test shows another InstCombine improvement - we use 
ComputeNumSignBits to add 'nsw' to shift-left. But the negative
test shows an example where we must not add 'nsw' - when the shuffle
mask contains undef elements.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53659

llvm-svn: 345429
2018-10-26 21:05:14 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
a724b41684 [Spectre] Fix MIR verifier errors in retpoline thunks
Summary:
The main challenge here is that X86InstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch doesn't
understand the way we're using a CALL instruction as a branch, so we
can't list the CallTarget MBB as a successor of the entry block. If we
don't list it as a successor, then the AsmPrinter doesn't print a label
for the MBB.

Fix the issue by inserting our own label at the beginning of the call
target block. We can rely on the AsmPrinter to always emit it, even
though the block appears to be unreachable, but address-taken.

Fixes PR38391.

Reviewers: thegameg, chandlerc, echristo

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53653

llvm-svn: 345426
2018-10-26 20:26:36 +00:00
Eli Friedman
d2bd14842f [ARM] Make InstrEmitter mark CPSR defs dead for Thumb1.
The "dead" markings allow existing target-independent optimizations,
like MachineSink, to trigger more frequently. The CPSR defs would have
eventually been marked dead by LiveVariables, so this only affects
optimizations before regalloc.

The ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp change is fixing a bug which is only visible
with this change: the transform adds a use to an otherwise dead def
of CPSR. This is covered by existing regression tests.

thumb2-tbh.ll breaks for Thumb1 due to MachineLICM changing the
generated code; I'll fix it in D53452.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53453

llvm-svn: 345420
2018-10-26 19:32:24 +00:00
Lei Huang
acf8f9b68d [PowerPC] Improve BUILD_VECTOR of 4 i32s
Currently, for this node:
  vector int test(int a, int b, int c, int d) {
    return (vector int) { a, b, c, d };
  }

we get this on Power9:
  mtvsrdd 34, 5, 3
  mtvsrdd 35, 6, 4
  vmrgow 2, 3, 2

and this on Power8:
  mtvsrwz 0, 3
  mtvsrwz 1, 5
  mtvsrwz 2, 4
  mtvsrwz 3, 6
  xxmrghd 34, 1, 0
  xxmrghd 35, 3, 2
  vmrgow 2, 3, 2

This can be improved to this on LE Power9:
  rldimi 3, 4, 32, 0
  rldimi 5, 6, 32, 0
  mtvsrdd 34, 5, 3

and this on LE Power8
  rldimi 3, 4, 32, 0
  rldimi 5, 6, 32, 0
  mtvsrd 34, 3
  mtvsrd 35, 5
  xxpermdi 34, 35, 34, 0

This patch updates the TD pattern to generate the optimized sequence for both
Power8 and Power9 on LE and BE.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53494

llvm-svn: 345414
2018-10-26 18:09:36 +00:00
Christy Lee
bee2de7843 Pointer types were treated as zero-size by MergeICmps
Summary:
The visitICmp analysis function would record compares of pointer types, as size 0. This causes the resulting memcmp() call to have the wrong total size.
Found with "self-build" of clang/LLVM on Windows.

Reviewers: christylee, trentxintong, courbet

Reviewed By: courbet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53536

llvm-svn: 345413
2018-10-26 18:02:06 +00:00
Craig Topper
5399eeead4 [X86] Stop promoting vector and/or/xor/andn to vXi64.
These promotions add additional bitcasts to the SelectionDAG that can pessimize computeKnownBits/computeNumSignBits. It also seems to interfere with broadcast formation.

This patch removes the promotion and adds isel patterns instead.

The increased table size is more than I would like, but hopefully we can find some canonicalizations or other tricks to start pruning out patterns going forward.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53268

llvm-svn: 345408
2018-10-26 17:21:26 +00:00
Craig Topper
520221ac38 [X86] Add -LABEL to some FileCheck checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 345407
2018-10-26 17:21:19 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih
a44e68f2da [MIR] Simplify and move MIR test
Also fixes a Machine Verifier issue.

llvm-svn: 345396
2018-10-26 16:00:29 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
5fa916fff5 [x86] commute blendvb with constant condition op to allow load folding
This is a narrow fix for 1 of the problems mentioned in PR27780:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27780

I looked at more general solutions, but it's a mess. We canonicalize shuffle masks
based on the number of elements accessed from each operand, and that's not optional.
If you remove that, we'll crash because we fail to match isel patterns. So I'm
waiting until we're sure that we have blendvb with constant condition and then
commuting based on the load potential. Other cases like blend-with-immediate are
already handled elsewhere, so this is probably not a common problem anyway.

I didn't use "MayFoldLoad" because that checks for one-use and in these cases, we've
screwed that up by creating a temporary PSHUFB using these operands that we're counting
on to be killed later. Undoing that didn't look like a simple task because it's
intertwined with determining if we actually use both operands of the shuffle or not.a

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53737

llvm-svn: 345390
2018-10-26 14:58:13 +00:00
Max Kazantsev
9b8cbc08e6 [SimpleLoopUnswitch] Unswitch by experimental.guard intrinsics
This patch adds support of `llvm.experimental.guard` intrinsics to non-trivial
simple loop unswitching. These intrinsics represent implicit control flow which
has pretty much the same semantics as usual conditional branches. The
algorithm of dealing with them is following:

- Consider guards as unswitching candidates;
- If a guard is considered the best candidate, turn it into a branch;
- Apply normal unswitching algorithm on this branch.

The patch has no compile time effect on code that does not contain any guards.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53744
Reviewed By: chandlerc

llvm-svn: 345387
2018-10-26 14:20:11 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer
893e1feaf4 [ARM] Fix ARMCodeGenPrepare test cases
While working on FileCheck producing better diagnostics in D53710, I noticed
that our test case is broken in a few different ways. The test was running, but
results were not checked as prefix CHECK-COMMON wasn't defined (which is what
FileCheck should warn about). Also, the output was different in 2 cases because
of recent changes in ARMCodeGenPrepare.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53746

llvm-svn: 345386
2018-10-26 14:19:57 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih
d842f3f52d [CodeGen] Remove out operands from PATCHABLE_OP
The current model requires 1 out operand, but it is not used nor created.

This fixed an x86 machine verifier issue.

Part of PR27481.

llvm-svn: 345384
2018-10-26 13:37:25 +00:00
Owen Reynolds
28caf03c9a [llvm-ar] Access ADDLIB in llvm-ar via command line
ADDLIB is called to add the contents of an archive to another archive. 
Previously this was only accessible through the use of an MRI script.

With the use of a new "L" modifier, archive files can treated in the 
manner above when using quick append.

llvm-svn: 345383
2018-10-26 13:34:38 +00:00
Scott Linder
1ba93908c7 [AMDGPU] Add a pass to promote bitcast calls
AMDGPU currently only supports direct calls, but at lower optimisation levels it
fails to lower statically direct calls which appear indirect due to a bitcast.

Add a pass to visit all CallSites and use CallPromotionUtils to "devirtualize"
calls.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52741

llvm-svn: 345382
2018-10-26 13:18:36 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
eeb4ff6bc2 Regenerate test
llvm-svn: 345379
2018-10-26 12:33:56 +00:00
George Rimar
efe1edf5b9 [Codegen] - Implement basic .debug_loclists section emission (DWARF5).
.debug_loclists is the DWARF 5 version of the .debug_loc.
With that patch, it will be emitted when DWARF 5 is used.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53365

llvm-svn: 345377
2018-10-26 11:25:12 +00:00
Li Jia He
7a6a1849fe [PowerPC] Fix some missed optimization opportunities in combineSetCC
For both operands are bool, short, int, long, long long, add the following optimization.
1. 0-x == y --> x+y ==0
2. 0-x != y --> x+y != 0

Review: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53360

llvm-svn: 345366
2018-10-26 06:48:53 +00:00
Li Jia He
23d7dd61df [PowerPC][NFC] Add tests for some missed optimization opportunities in combineSetCC
For both operands are bool, short, int, long, long long, add the following optimization test case.
1. 0-x == y --> x+y ==0
2. 0-x != y --> x+y != 0

Review: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53358

llvm-svn: 345365
2018-10-26 05:02:10 +00:00
Nemanja Ivanovic
c3ce6b54bb [PowerPC] Keep vector int to fp conversions in vector domain
At present a v2i16 -> v2f64 convert is implemented by extracts to scalar,
scalar converts, and merge back into a vector. Use vector converts instead,
with the int data permuted into the proper position and extended if necessary.

Patch by RolandF.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53346

llvm-svn: 345361
2018-10-26 03:19:13 +00:00
Fangrui Song
885a8aa8f4 [Pipeliner] Mark swp-art-deps-rec.ll as REQUIRES: asserts after rL345319
llvm-svn: 345359
2018-10-26 03:15:56 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich
4d6b75f373 Revert "[AArch64] Create proper memoperand for multi-vector stores"
This reverts commit r345315, it was causing test failures on
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.

llvm-svn: 345356
2018-10-26 02:00:14 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson
9737910347 [SystemZ] Implement SystemZOperand::print()
SystemZAsmParser can now handle -debug by printing the operands neatly to the
output stream. Before this patch this lead to an llvm_unreachable().

It seems that now '-mllvm -debug' does not cause any crashes anywhere (at
least not on SPEC).

Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53328

llvm-svn: 345349
2018-10-26 00:36:00 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson
b70da1d411 [SystemZ] Pass the DAG pointer from SystemZAddressingMode::dump().
In order to print the IR slot number for the memory operand, the DAG pointer
must be passed to SDNode::dump().

The isel-debug.ll test updated to also check for the IR Value reference being
printed correctly.

Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53333

llvm-svn: 345347
2018-10-26 00:02:33 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
d9006dde10 Reland "[WebAssembly] LSDA info generation"
Summary:
This adds support for LSDA (exception table) generation for wasm EH.
Wasm EH mostly follows the structure of Itanium-style exception tables,
with one exception: a call site table entry in wasm EH corresponds to
not a call site but a landing pad.

In wasm EH, the VM is responsible for stack unwinding. After an
exception occurs and the stack is unwound, the control flow is
transferred to wasm 'catch' instruction by the VM, after which the
personality function is called from the compiler-generated code. (Refer
to WasmEHPrepare pass for more information on this part.)

This patch:
- Changes wasm.landingpad.index intrinsic to take a token argument, to
make this 1:1 match with a catchpad instruction
- Stores landingpad index info and catch type info MachineFunction in
before instruction selection
- Lowers wasm.lsda intrinsic to an MCSymbol pointing to the start of an
exception table
- Adds WasmException class with overridden methods for table generation
- Adds support for LSDA section in Wasm object writer

Reviewers: dschuff, sbc100, rnk

Subscribers: mgorny, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52748

llvm-svn: 345345
2018-10-25 23:55:10 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
996bc5be27 [WebAssembly] Support EH instructions in InstPrinter
Summary: This adds support for exception handling instructions to InstPrinter.

Reviewers: dschuff, aardappel

Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53634

llvm-svn: 345343
2018-10-25 23:45:48 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson
da5fb3c4a3 Fix in MachineOperand::printIRValueReference().
Handle the case where getCurrentFunction() returns nullptr by passing -1 to
printIRSlotNumber(). This will result in <badref> being printed instead of an
assertion failure.

Review: Francis Visoiu Mistrih
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53333

llvm-svn: 345342
2018-10-25 23:39:07 +00:00
Bryan Chan
7c08c135e3 [AArch64] Implement FP16FML intrinsics
Add LLVM intrinsics for the ARMv8.2-A FP16FML vector-form instructions. Add a
DAG pattern to define the indexed-form intrinsics in terms of the vector-form
ones, similarly to how the Dot Product intrinsics were implemented.

Based on a patch by Gao Yiling.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53632

llvm-svn: 345337
2018-10-25 23:36:41 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
9d4ed39735 Delete test case. Assertions can't be tested.
llvm-svn: 345336
2018-10-25 23:35:15 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
377d125aa5 Tidy up test case
llvm-svn: 345335
2018-10-25 23:35:15 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
d7cb45623a Address comments
- Add llvm-mc test case (and delete the old one)
- Change report_fatal_error to assertions

llvm-svn: 345334
2018-10-25 23:35:14 +00:00
Heejin Ahn
6e3c0030be [WebAssembly] Error out when block/loop markers mismatch
Summary:
Currently InstPrinter ignores if there are mismatches between block/loop
and end markers by skipping the case if ControlFlowStack is empty. I
guess it is better to explicitly error out in this case, because this
signals invalid input.

Reviewers: aardappel

Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53620

llvm-svn: 345333
2018-10-25 23:35:13 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson
7fed640ca5 [SystemZ] Improve getMemoryOpCost() to find foldable loads that are converted.
The SystemZ backend can do arithmetic of memory by loading and then extending
one of the operands. Similarly, a load + truncate can be folded into an
operand.

This patch improves the SystemZ TTI cost function to recognize this.

Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52692

llvm-svn: 345327
2018-10-25 22:28:25 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
f65feaa95c [x86] add tests for missed load folding; NFC
llvm-svn: 345325
2018-10-25 22:23:27 +00:00
Jonas Paulsson
531880d371 [SystemZ] Improve handling and cost estimates of vector integer div/rem
Enable the DAG optimization that converts vector div/rem with constants into
multiply+shifts sequences by expanding them early. This is needed since
ISD::SMUL_LOHI is 'Custom' lowered on SystemZ, and will therefore not be
available to BuildSDIV after legalization.

Better cost values for these instructions based on how they will be
implemented (a constant divisor is cheaper).

Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53196

llvm-svn: 345321
2018-10-25 21:47:22 +00:00
David Blaikie
2dd2dab1ff llvm-dwarfdump: loclists: Don't expect an (albeit empty) expression for LLE_base_address
llvm-svn: 345320
2018-10-25 21:35:59 +00:00
Sumanth Gundapaneni
38dfbc5f13 [Pipeliner] Ignore Artificial dependences while computing recurrences.
The artificial dependencies are not real dependencies. In some cases, they
form circuits with bigger MII. However, they are used to schedule instructions
better.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53450

llvm-svn: 345319
2018-10-25 21:27:08 +00:00