The memory location an invariant load is using can never be clobbered by
any store, so it's safe to move the load ahead of the store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46011
llvm-svn: 330725
Zero latency instructions are now scheduled the same way as other instructions.
Before this patch, there was a specialzed code path for those instructions.
All scheduler events are now generated from method `scheduleInstruction()` and
from method `cycleEvent()`. This will make easier to implement a "execution
stage", and let that stage publish all the scheduler events.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 330723
While not necessary for correctness, it is preferable for
performance reasons on all architectures we currently support
to align functions to 16-byte boundaries by default.
llvm-svn: 330718
Split off pinsr/pextr and extractps instructions.
(Mostly) fixes PR36887.
Note: It might be worth adding a WriteFInsertLd class as well in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45929
llvm-svn: 330714
Summary:
If attribute "use-soft-float"="true" is set then X86ISelLowering.cpp sets
'Promote' action for ISD::SINT_TO_FP operation on type i32.
But 'Promote' action is not proper in this case since lib function
__floatsidf is available for casting from signed int to float type.
Thus Expand action is more suitable here.
The Expand action should be set for ISD::UINT_TO_FP for soft float as well.
If function attribute "use-soft-float"="true" is set then infinite looping
can happen in DAG combining, function visitSINT_TO_FP() replaces SINT_TO_FP
node with UINT_TO_FP node and function combineUIntToFP() replace vice versa in cycle.
The fix prevents it.
Patch by vrybalov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45572
llvm-svn: 330711
loop unswitch.
This code incorrectly added the header to the loop block set early. As
a consequence we would incorrectly conclude that a nested loop body had
already been visited when the header of the outer loop was the preheader
of the nested loop. In retrospect, adding the header eagerly doesn't
really make sense. It seems nicer to let the cycle be formed naturally.
This will catch crazy bugs in the CFG reconstruction where we can't
correctly form the cycle earlier rather than later, and makes the rest
of the logic just fall out.
I've also added various asserts that make these issues *much* easier to
debug.
llvm-svn: 330707
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848
llvm-svn: 330706
Guard the MIPS64 variant correctly for i64, mark the MIPS32 version as not
in microMIPS and provide the microMIPS version.
Additionally, remove a related stale XFAIL'd test as bswap has its own test
case providing coverage.
Reviewers: smaksimovic, abeserminji, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45816
llvm-svn: 330705
Summary:
The pass is supposed to scalarize such intrinsics if the target does not support
them natively, so if the scalarization does not happen instruction selection
crashes due to inability to lower these intrinsics.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45947
llvm-svn: 330700
By checking that none of the child loops contain a BB we make sure BBMap
contains the innermost loop defining BB. This invariant was violated in
LoopInterchange and got caught by this assertion.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mzolotukhin, sanjoy, mehdi_amini, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45971
llvm-svn: 330698
/usr/local/bin/ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::createAggressiveInstCombinerPass()
>>> referenced by cc1_main.cpp
>>> tools/clang/tools/driver/CMakeFiles/clang.dir/cc1_main.cpp.o:(_GLOBAL__sub_I_cc1_main.cpp)
And so on
The bot coverage is clearly missing.
llvm-svn: 330693
Summary:
I am preparing a patch to the path function. While working on it, I
noticed that some of the areas are lacking test coverage (e.g. filename
and parent_path functions), so I add more tests to guard against
regressions there.
I have also found the failure messages hard to understand, so I rewrote
some existing test to give more actionable messages when they fail:
- for tests which run over multiple inputs, I use SCOPED_TRACE, to show
which of the inputs caused the actual failure.
- for comparisons of vectors, I use gmock's container matchers, which
will print out the full container contents (and the elements that
differ) when they fail to match.
Reviewers: zturner, espindola
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45941
llvm-svn: 330691
Add explicit dependency on ObjcopyTableGen
and rerun the tests on Windows.
I will double-check the build bots
and revert this commit if necessary.
llvm-svn: 330685
This encoding is recognized by the CPU, but the behavior is undefined. This makes the disassembler handle it correctly so we don't print bswapl with a 16-bit register.
llvm-svn: 330682
This code path can very clearly be called in a context where we have
baselined all the cloned blocks to a particular loop and are trying to
handle nested subloops. There is no harm in this, so just relax the
assert. I've added a test case that will make sure we actually exercise
this code path.
llvm-svn: 330680
The test is apparently needed e.g. for check-cfi on Windows where we get
'C:/b/slave/sanitizer-windows/build/./bin/clang.exe': command not found
without it. Try to fix the problem that was fixed by r330672 by also checking
for isabs() instead.
llvm-svn: 330673
lit's util.which() would check if the passed-in path existed directly,
and if so return it as-is. This is never the case when running llvm's, clang's,
or lld's tests normally. But when running `./llvm-lit path/to/clang/test`
with a cwd of llvm-build/bin, this if would detect that clang exists at path
'clang' and return 'clang' as the discovered clang binary -- and then lit would
use the " clang " -> "*** Do not use 'clang' in tests, use '%clang'. ***"
substitution to replace that with a broken test. By removing this early
return, lit ends up with the usual absolute path and everything works even
in this uncommon case.
llvm-svn: 330672
(notionally Scalar.h is part of libLLVMScalarOpts, so it shouldn't be
included by InstCombine which doesn't/shouldn't need to depend on
ScalarOpts)
llvm-svn: 330669
I was reminded today that this patch got reverted in r301885. I can no
longer reproduce the failure that caused the revert locally (...almost
one year later), and the patch applied pretty cleanly, so I guess we'll
see if the bots still get angry about it.
The original breakage was InstSimplify complaining (in "assertion
failed" form) about getting passed some crazy IR when running `ninja
check-sanitizer`. I'm unable to find traces of what, exactly, said crazy
IR was. I suppose we'll find out pretty soon if that's still the case.
:)
Original commit:
Author: gbiv
Date: Mon May 1 18:12:08 2017
New Revision: 301880
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=301880&view=rev
Log:
[InstSimplify] Handle selects of GEPs with 0 offset
In particular (since it wouldn't fit nicely in the summary):
(select (icmp eq V 0) P (getelementptr P V)) -> (getelementptr P V)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31435
llvm-svn: 330667
As we're becoming stricter w/ respect to not allowing vregs having LLTs
and regclasses assigned both mid-globalisel pipeline, the number of
extra copies grows, some of which separate G_UNMERGE's from their
corresponding G_MERGE's, becoming a performance concern.
It's worth mentioning that we're already looking through copies while
combining legalization artifacts for every kind of artifact but
G_UNMERGE.
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, volkan, javed.absar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45644
llvm-svn: 330660
If a loop with child loops becomes our new inner loop after
interchanging, we only need to update LoopInfo for the blocks defined in
the old outer loop. BBs in child loops will stay there.
Reviewers: efriedma, karthikthecool, mcrosier
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45970
llvm-svn: 330653
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
So we need to make sure that they are still generated.
If the mask is constant, we do nothing. InstCombine should have unfolded it.
Else, i use `hasAndNot()` TLI hook.
For now, only handle scalars.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bO6
----
I *really* don't like the code i wrote in `DAGCombiner::unfoldMaskedMerge()`.
It is super fragile. Is there something like IR Pattern Matchers for this?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, courbet, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, rengolin, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45733
llvm-svn: 330646
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
I'm guessing `llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp` should be able to unfold this.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nemanjai, rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45563
llvm-svn: 330645
I'm not sure if this is where we should try to fold these
patterns inspired by:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37098
...if this isn't the right place, we can move the tests.
llvm-svn: 330642
