for this class. These tests exercise most of the basic properties, but
the API for TinyPtrVector is very strange currently. My plan is to start
fleshing out the API to match that of SmallVector, but I wanted a test
for what is there first.
Sadly, it doesn't look reasonable to just re-use the SmallVector tests,
as this container can only ever store pointers, and much of the
SmallVector testing is to get construction and destruction right.
Just to get this basic test working, I had to add value_type to the
interface.
While here I found a subtle bug in the combination of 'erase', 'begin',
and 'end'. Both 'begin' and 'end' wanted to use a null pointer to
indicate the "end" iterator of an empty vector, regardless of whether
there is actually a vector allocated or the pointer union is null.
Everything else was fine with this except for erase. If you erase the
last element of a vector after it has held more than one element, we
return the end iterator of the underlying SmallVector which need not be
a null pointer. Instead, simply use the pointer, and poniter + size()
begin/end definitions in the tiny case, and delegate to the inner vector
whenever it is present.
llvm-svn: 161024
CallInst for intrinsics. This allows users of the InstVisitor that would
like to special case certain very common intrinsics to do so naturally
in keeping with the type hierarchy's utility classes.
llvm-svn: 161006
test more than a single instantiation of SmallVector.
Add testing for 0, 1, 2, and 4 element sized "small" buffers. These
appear to be essentially untested in the unit tests until now.
Fix several tests to be robust in the face of a '0' small buffer. As
a consequence of this size buffer, the growth patterns are actually
observable in the test -- yes this means that many tests never caused
a grow to occur before. For some tests I've merely added a reserve call
to normalize behavior. For others, the growth is actually interesting,
and so I captured the fact that growth would occur and adjusted the
assertions to not assume how rapidly growth occured.
Also update the specialization for a '0' small buffer length to have all
the same interface points as the normal small vector.
llvm-svn: 161001
This is a cleaned up version of the isFree() function in
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp.
Transient instructions are very unlikely to produce any code in the
final output. Either because they get eliminated by RegisterCoalescing,
or because they are pseudo-instructions like labels and debug values.
llvm-svn: 160977
A->isPredecessor(B) is the same as B->isSuccessor(A), but it can
tolerate a B that is null or dangling. This shouldn't happen normally,
but it it useful for verification code.
llvm-svn: 160968
Machine CSE and other optimizations can remove instructions so folding
is possible at peephole while not possible at ISel.
rdar://10554090 and rdar://11873276
llvm-svn: 160919
A value number is a PHI def if and only if it begins at a block
boundary. This can be derived from the def slot, a separate flag is not
necessary.
llvm-svn: 160893
This option replaces the existing live interval computation with one
based on LiveRangeCalc.cpp. The new algorithm does not depend on
LiveVariables, and it can be run at any time, before or after leaving
SSA form.
llvm-svn: 160892
The rationale here is that it's hard to write loops containing vector erases and
it only shows up if the vector contains non-trivial objects leading to crashes
when forming them out of garbage memory.
llvm-svn: 160854
These tables were indexed by [register][subreg index] which made them,
very large and sparse.
Replace them with lists of sub-register indexes that match the existing
lists of sub-registers. MCRI::getSubReg() becomes a very short linear
search, like getSubRegIndex() already was.
llvm-svn: 160843
Now that the weird X86 sub_ss and sub_sd sub-register indexes are gone,
there is no longer a need for the CompositeIndices construct in .td
files. Sub-register index composition can be specified on the
SubRegIndex itself using the ComposedOf field.
Also enforce unique names for sub-registers in TableGen. The same
sub-register cannot be available with multiple sub-register indexes.
llvm-svn: 160842
This is still a work in progress.
Out-of-order CPUs usually execute instructions from multiple basic
blocks simultaneously, so it is necessary to look at longer traces when
estimating the performance effects of code transformations.
The MachineTraceMetrics analysis will pick a typical trace through a
given basic block and provide performance metrics for the trace. Metrics
will include:
- Instruction count through the trace.
- Issue count per functional unit.
- Critical path length, and per-instruction 'slack'.
These metrics can be used to determine the performance limiting factor
when executing the trace, and how it will be affected by a code
transformation.
Initially, this will be used by the early if-conversion pass.
llvm-svn: 160796
struct s {
double x1;
float x2;
};
__attribute__((regparm(3))) struct s f(int a, int b, int c);
void g(void) {
f(41, 42, 43);
}
We need to be able to represent passing the address of s to f (sret) in a
register (inreg). Turns out that all that is needed is to not mark them as
mutually incompatible.
llvm-svn: 160695
