Summary:
Two folds are happening here:
1. https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oaFX
2. And then `foldICmpWithHighBitMask()` (D52001): https://rise4fun.com/Alive/wsP4
This change doesn't just add the handling for eq/ne predicates,
it actually builds upon the previous `foldICmpWithLowBitMaskedVal()` work,
so **all** the 16 fold variants* are immediately supported.
I'm indeed only testing these two predicates.
I do not feel like re-proving all 16 folds*, because they were already proven
for the general case of constant with all-ones in low bits. So as long as
the mask produces all-ones in low bits, i'm pretty sure the fold is valid.
But required, i can re-prove, let me know.
* eq/ne are commutative - 4 folds; ult/ule/ugt/uge - are not commutative (the commuted variant is InstSimplified), 4 folds; slt/sle/sgt/sge are not commutative - 4 folds. 12 folds in total.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52146
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342546 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@
The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.
Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
and access to them.
* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
(adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.
* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).
* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.
* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
RepeatedPass::run.
TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.
* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run
* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342544 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is still unsafe for long double, we will transform things into tanl
even if tanl is for another type. But that's for someone else to fix.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Currently only the first function in the module is checked to
see if it has remarks enabled. If that first function is a declaration,
remarks will be incorrectly skipped. Change to look for the first
non-empty function.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51556
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342477 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A piece of logic in rewriteLoopExitValues has a weird check on number of
users which allowed an unprofitable transform in case if an instruction has
more than 6 users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51404
Reviewed By: etherzhhb
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342444 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was checking the hardcoded address space 0 for the stack.
Additionally, this should be checking for legality with
the adjusted alignment, so defer the alignment check.
Also try to split if the unaligned access isn't allowed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342442 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
EarlyCSE can make IR changes that will leave MemorySSA with accesses claiming to be optimized, but for which a subsequent MemorySSA run will yield a different optimized result.
Due to relying on AA queries, we can't fix this in general, unless we recompute MemorySSA.
Adding some tests to track this and a basic verify for future potential failures.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, gberry
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51960
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342422 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rebase rL341954 since https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912
has been fixed by rL342055.
Precommit testing performed:
* Overnight runs of csmith comparing the output between programs
compiled with gvn-hoist enabled/disabled.
* Bootstrap builds of clang with UbSan/ASan configurations.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342387 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
If the sub doesn't overflow in the original type we can move it above the sext/zext.
This is similar to what we do for add. The overflow checking for sub is currently weaker than add, so the test cases are constructed for what is supported.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52075
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Missing optimizations with blendv are shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38814
If this works, it's an easier and more powerful solution than adding pattern matching
for a few special cases in the backend. The potential danger with this transform in IR
is that the condition value can get separated from the select, and the backend might
not be able to make a blendv out of it again. I don't think that's too likely, but
I've kept this patch minimal with a 'TODO', so we can test that theory in the wild
before expanding the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52059
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Similar to rL342278:
The test diffs are all cosmetic due to the change in
value naming, but I'm including that to show that the
new code does perform these folds rather than something
else in instcombine.
D52075 should be able to use this code too rather than
duplicating all of the logic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342292 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The mul case can already be refactored to use this similar to
rL342278.
The sub case is proposed in D52075.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342289 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The patch saves a function offset table which maps function name index to the
offset of its function profile to the start of the binary profile. By using
the function offset table, for those function profiles which will not be used
when compiling a module, the profile reader does't have to read them. For
profile size around 10~20M, it saves ~10% compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51863
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test diffs are all cosmetic due to the change in
value naming, but I'm including that to show that the
new code does perform these folds rather than something
else in instcombine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342278 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The test used to fail with an invalid phi node: the two predecessors were outlined
and the SSA representation was left invalid. The patch adds the exit block to the
cold region.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342277 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
remove duplicate entries from isSingleEntrySingleExit: the Entry block is
already added by the loop over the dominance frontier.
Remove the heuristic from isOutlineCandidate that a region is too small when it
only contains a basic block. With this change we now grow regions starting from
a block and we continue adding to the ValidColdRegion. Check the heuristic just
before code generation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342276 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Also fix a problem in forward propagation:
const TerminatorInst *TI = It->getTerminator();
was set outside the while loop that iterates over It.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342275 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
As preparation for LoopInterchange becoming a loop pass, it needs to
preserve ScalarEvolution. Even though interchanging should not change
the trip count of the loop, it modifies loop entry, latch and exit
blocks.
I added -verify-scev to some loop interchange tests, but the verification does
not catch problems caused by missing invalidation of SE in loop interchange, as
the trip counts themselves do not change. So there might be potential to
make the SE verification covering more stuff in the future.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, efriedma, karthikthecool
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52026
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342209 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
[VPlan] Implement vector code generation support for simple outer loops.
Context: Patch Series #1 for outer loop vectorization support in LV using VPlan. (RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119523.html).
This patch introduces vector code generation support for simple outer loops that are currently supported in the VPlanNativePath. Changes here essentially do the following:
- force vector code generation using explicit vectorize_width
- add conservative early returns in cost model and other places for VPlanNativePath
- add code for setting up outer loop inductions
- support for widening non-induction PHIs that can result from inner loops and uniform conditional branches
- support for generating uniform inner branches
We plan to add a handful C outer loop executable tests once the initial code generation support is committed. This patch is expected to be NFC for the inner loop vectorizer path. Since we are moving in the direction of supporting outer loop vectorization in LV, it may also be time to rename classes such as InnerLoopVectorizer.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, hsaito, dcaballe, mkuper, hfinkel, Ayal
Reviewed By: fhahn, hsaito
Subscribers: dmgreen, bollu, tschuett, rkruppe, rogfer01, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50820
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342197 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Place global arrays in comdat sections with their associated functions.
This makes sure they are stripped along with the functions they
reference, even on the BFD linker.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51902
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342186 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
It is sometimes important to check that some newly-computed value
is non-negative and only n bits wide (where n is a variable.)
There are many ways to check that:
https://godbolt.org/z/o4RB8D
The last variant seems best?
(I'm sure there are some other variations i haven't thought of..)
More complicated, canonical pattern:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/uhA
We do need to have two `switch()`'es like this,
to not mismatch the swappable predicates.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52001
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342173 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I accidentally committed this diff with rL342147 because
I had applied D51964. We probably do need those checks,
but D51964 has tests and more discussion/motivation,
so they should be re-added with that patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342149 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I don't have a test case for this, but it's motivated by
the discussion in D51964, and I've added TODO comments for
the better fix - move simplifications into instsimplify
because that's more efficient and reduces risk of infinite
loops in instcombine caused by transforms trying to do the
opposite folds.
In this case, we know that the transform that tries to move
'not' through min/max can be fooled by the multiple uses
of a value in another min/max, so try to squash the
foldSPFofSPF() patterns first.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342147 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38912.
In GVNHoist::computeInsertionPoints() we iterate over the Value
Numbers and calculate the Iterated Dominance Frontiers without
clearing the IDFBlocks vector first. IDFBlocks ends up accumulating
an insane number of basic blocks, which bloats the compilation time
of SemaChecking.cpp with ubsan enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51980
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342055 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously the alignment on the newly created switch table data was not set,
meaning that DataLayout::getPreferredAlignment was free to overalign it to 16
bytes. This causes unnecessary code bloat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51800
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342039 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move the 2 classes out of LoopVectorize.cpp to make it easier to re-use
them for VPlan outside LoopVectorize.cpp
Reviewers: Ayal, mssimpso, rengolin, dcaballe, mkuper, hsaito, hfinkel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: rengolin, xbolva00
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49488
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342027 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The InductionDescriptor and RecurrenceDescriptor classes basically analyze the IR to identify the respective IVs. So, it is better to have them in the "Analysis" directory instead of the "Transforms" directory.
The rationale for this is to make the Induction and Recurrence descriptor classes available for analysis passes. Currently including them in an analysis pass produces link error (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124456.html).
Induction and Recurrence descriptors are moved from Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h|cpp to Analysis/IVDescriptors.h|cpp.
Reviewers: dmgreen, llvm-commits, hfinkel
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51153
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342016 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Name: op_ugt_sum
%a = add i8 %x, %y
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, %a
=>
%notx = xor i8 %x, -1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %y, %notx
Name: sum_ult_op
%a = add i8 %x, %y
%r = icmp ult i8 %a, %x
=>
%notx = xor i8 %x, -1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %y, %notx
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRxI
AFAICT, this doesn't interfere with any add-saturation patterns
because those have >1 use for the 'add'. But this should be
better for IR analysis and codegen in the basic cases.
This is another fold inspired by PR14613:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts rL341954.
The builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` has been
failing with timeouts at stage2 clang/ubsan:
[3065/3073] Linking CXX executable bin/lld
command timed out: 1200 seconds without output running python
../sanitizer_buildbot/sanitizers/buildbot_selector.py,
attempting to kill
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342001 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
These are the folds in Alive;
Name: xor_ult
Pre: isPowerOf2(-C1)
%xor = xor i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp ult i8 %xor, C1
=>
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, ~C1
Name: xor_ugt
Pre: isPowerOf2(C1+1)
%xor = xor i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %xor, C1
=>
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, C1
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vty
The ugt case in its simplest form was already handled by DemandedBits,
but that's not ideal as shown in the multi-use test.
I'm not sure if these are all of the symmetrical folds, but I adjusted
the existing code for one of the folds to try to show the similarities.
There's no obvious connection, but this is another preliminary step
for PR14613...
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341997 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Place global arrays in comdat sections with their associated functions.
This makes sure they are stripped along with the functions they
reference, even on the BFD linker.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51902
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341987 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Right now, the counters are added in regards of the number of successors
for a given BasicBlock: it's good when we've only 1 or 2 successors (at
least with BranchInstr). But in the case of a switch statement, the
BasicBlock after switch has several predecessors and we need know from
which BB we're coming from.
So the idea is to revert what we're doing: add a PHINode in each block
which will select the counter according to the incoming BB. They're
several pros for doing that:
- we fix the "switch" bug
- we remove the function call to "__llvm_gcov_indirect_counter_increment"
and the lookup table stuff
- we replace by PHINodes, so the optimizer will probably makes a better
job.
Patch by calixte!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51619
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341977 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
