arrays with variable indices into a comparison of the index
with a constant. The most common occurrence of this that
I see by far is stuff like:
if ("foobar"[i] == '\0') ...
which we compile into: if (i == 6), saving a load and
materialization of the global address. This also exposes
loop trip count information to later passes in many cases.
This triggers hundreds of times in xalancbmk, which is where I first
noticed it, but it also triggers in many other apps. Here are a few
interesting ones from various apps:
@must_be_connected_without = internal constant [8 x i8*] [i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str64320, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str27283, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8]* @.str71327, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8]* @.str72328, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str18274, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([6 x i8]* @.str11267, i64 0, i64 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8]* @.str32288, i64 0, i64 0), i8* null], align 32 ; <[8 x i8*]*> [#uses=2]
%scevgep.i = getelementptr [8 x i8*]* @must_be_connected_without, i64 0, i64 %indvar.i ; <i8**> [#uses=1]
%17 = load ...
%18 = icmp eq i8* %17, null ; <i1> [#uses=1]
-> icmp eq i64 %indvar.i, 7
@yytable1095 = internal constant [84 x i8] c"\12\01(\05\06\07\08\09\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E1\0F\10\11266\1D: \10\11,-,0\03'\10\11B6\04\17&\18\1945\05\06\07\08\09\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\1E\0F\10\11*\1A\1B\1C$3+>#%;<IJ=ADFEGH9KL\00\00\00C", align 32 ; <[84 x i8]*> [#uses=2]
%57 = getelementptr inbounds [84 x i8]* @yytable1095, i64 0, i64 %56 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%mode.0.in = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @mb_mode_table, i64 0, i64 %.pn ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
load ...
%64 = icmp eq i8 %58, 4 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
-> icmp eq i64 %.pn, 35 ; <i1> [#uses=0]
@gsm_DLB = internal constant [4 x i16] [i16 6554, i16 16384, i16 26214, i16 32767]
%scevgep.i = getelementptr [4 x i16]* @gsm_DLB, i64 0, i64 %indvar.i ; <i16*> [#uses=1]
%425 = load %scevgep.i
%426 = icmp eq i16 %425, -32768 ; <i1> [#uses=0]
-> false
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92411 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
pointer to int casts that confuse later optimizations. See PR3351
for details.
This improves but doesn't complete fix 483.xalancbmk because llvm-gcc
does this xform in GCC's "fold" routine as well. Clang++ will do
better I guess.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92408 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(X != null) | (Y != null) --> (X|Y) != 0
(X == null) & (Y == null) --> (X|Y) == 0
so that instcombine can stop doing this for pointers. This is part of PR3351,
which is a case where instcombine doing this for pointers (inserting ptrtoint)
is pessimizing code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92406 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a constantexpr gep on the 'base' side of the expression.
This completes comment #4 in PR3351, which comes from
483.xalancbmk.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiply sequence when the power is a constant integer. Before, our
codegen for std::pow(.., int) always turned into a libcall, which was
really inefficient.
This should also make many gfortran programs happier I'd imagine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92388 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
positive and negative forms of constants together. This
allows us to compile:
int foo(int x, int y) {
return (x-y) + (x-y) + (x-y);
}
into:
_foo: ## @foo
subl %esi, %edi
leal (%rdi,%rdi,2), %eax
ret
instead of (where the 3 and -3 were not factored):
_foo:
imull $-3, 8(%esp), %ecx
imull $3, 4(%esp), %eax
addl %ecx, %eax
ret
this started out as:
movl 12(%ebp), %ecx
imull $3, 8(%ebp), %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
subl %ecx, %eax
ret
This comes from PR5359.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@92381 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
