Part of D58593.
Compute precise overflow conditions based on all known bits, rather
than just the sign bits. Unsigned a + b overflows iff a > ~b, and we
can determine whether this always/never happens based on the minimal
and maximal values achievable for a and ~b subject to the known bits
constraint.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@355072 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Widenable condition intrinsic is guaranteed to return value, notify
the isGuaranteedToTransferExecutionToSuccessor function about it.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@354020 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@353563 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@351636 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
minted `CallBase` class instead of the `CallSite` wrapper.
This moves the largest interwoven collection of APIs that traffic in
`CallSite`s. While a handful of these could have been migrated with
a minorly more shallow migration by converting from a `CallSite` to
a `CallBase`, it hardly seemed worth it. Most of the APIs needed to
migrate together because of the complex interplay of AA APIs and the
fact that converting from a `CallBase` to a `CallSite` isn't free in its
current implementation.
Out of tree users of these APIs can fairly reliably migrate with some
combination of `.getInstruction()` on the `CallSite` instance and
casting the resulting pointer. The most generic form will look like `CS`
-> `cast_or_null<CallBase>(CS.getInstruction())` but in most cases there
is a more elegant migration. Hopefully, this migrates enough APIs for
users to fully move from `CallSite` to the base class. All of the
in-tree users were easily migrated in that fashion.
Thanks for the review from Saleem!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55641
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350503 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset include this code, where ByteOffset
and GEPOffset are both of type llvm::APInt :
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.getSExtValue();
The problem with this line is that getSExtValue() returns an int64_t, but
the += matches an overload for uint64_t. The problem is that the resulting
APInt is no longer considered to be signed. That in turn causes assertion
failures later on if the relevant pointer type is > 64 bits in width and
the GEPOffset was negative.
Changing it to
ByteOffset += GEPOffset.sextOrTrunc(ByteOffset.getBitWidth());
resolves the issue and explicitly performs the sign-extending
or truncation. Additionally, instead of asserting later if the result
is > 64 bits, it breaks out of the loop in that case.
See also
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24729https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772
This commit must be merged after D38662 in order for the test to pass.
Patch by Michael Ferguson <mpfergu@gmail.com>.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38501
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the shift amount is known, we can determine the known bits of the
output based on the known bits of two inputs.
This is essentially the same functionality as implemented in D54869,
but for ValueTracking rather than InstCombine SimplifyDemandedBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55140
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348091 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were duplicating code around the existing isImpliedCondition() that
checks for a predecessor block/dominating condition, so make that a
wrapper call.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@348088 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Always-overflow was already determined for unsigned addition, but
not subtraction. This patch establishes parity.
This allows us to perform some additional simplifications for
signed saturating subtractions.
This change is part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54534.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@347771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
In PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
..we may fail to recognize/simplify fabs() in some cases because we do not
canonicalize fcmp with a -0.0 operand.
Adding that canonicalization can cause regressions on min/max FP tests, so
that's this patch: for the purpose of determining whether something is min/max,
let the value returned by the select determine how we treat a 0.0 operand in the fcmp.
This patch doesn't actually change the -0.0 to +0.0. It just changes the analysis, so
we don't fail to recognize equivalent min/max patterns that only differ in the
signbit of 0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54001
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346097 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch gives the IR ComputeNumSignBits the same functionality as the
DAG version (the code is derived from the existing code).
This an extension of the single input shuffle analysis added with D53659.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53987
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@346071 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The motivating case is from PR37549:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37549
The analysis improvement allows us to form a vector 'select' out of
bitwise logic (the use of ComputeNumSignBits was added at rL345149).
The smaller test shows another InstCombine improvement - we use
ComputeNumSignBits to add 'nsw' to shift-left. But the negative
test shows an example where we must not add 'nsw' - when the shuffle
mask contains undef elements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53659
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@345429 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This CL allows constant vectors of floats to be recognized as non-NaN
and non-zero in select patterns. This change makes
`matchSelectPattern` more powerful generally, but was motivated
specifically because I wanted fminnan and fmaxnan to be created for
vector versions of the scalar patterns they are created for.
Tested with check-all on all targets. A testcase in the WebAssembly
backend that tests the non-nan codepath is in an upcoming CL.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52324
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@343364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
his code was in CGDecl.cpp and really belongs in LLVM's isBytewiseValue. Teach isBytewiseValue the tricks clang's isRepeatedBytePattern had, including merging undef properly, and recursing on more types.
clang part of this patch: D51752
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51751
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@342709 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
rL340921 has been reverted by rL340923 due to linkage dependency
from Transform/Utils to Analysis which is not allowed. In this patch
this has been fixed, a new utility function moved to Analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@341014 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We have multiple places in code where we try to identify whether or not
some instruction is a guard. This patch factors out this logic into a separate
utility function which works uniformly in all places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51152
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340921 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We need to allow ConstantExpr Selects in addition to SelectInst.
I'll try to put together a test case, but I wanted to fix the issues being reported.
Fixes PR38677
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340546 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If we have a min/max pair we can do a better job of counting sign bits if we look at them together. This is similar to what is done in the SelectionDAG version of computeNumSignBits for ISD::SMAX/SMIN.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51112
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
NewGVN uses InstructionSimplify for simplifications of leaders of
congruence classes. It is not guaranteed that the metadata or other
flags/keywords (like nsw or exact) of the leader is available for all members
in a congruence class, so we cannot use it for simplification.
This patch adds a InstrInfoQuery struct with a boolean field
UseInstrInfo (which defaults to true to keep the current behavior as
default) and a set of helper methods to get metadata/keywords for a
given instruction, if UseInstrInfo is true. The whole thing might need a
better name, to avoid confusion with TargetInstrInfo but I am not sure
what a better name would be.
The current patch threads through InstrInfoQuery to the required
places, which is messier then it would need to be, if
InstructionSimplify and ValueTracking would share the same Query struct.
The reason I added it as a separate struct is that it can be shared
between InstructionSimplify and ValueTracking's query objects. Also,
some places do not need a full query object, just the InstrInfoQuery.
It also updates some interfaces that do not take a Query object, but a
set of optional parameters to take an additional boolean UseInstrInfo.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37540.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, efriedma, sebpop, hiraditya
Reviewed By: hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47143
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@340031 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
`isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition` is able to prove non-null basing on `br` or `guard`
by `%p != null` condition, but is unable to do so basing on `(%p != null) && %other_cond`.
This patch allows it to do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50172
Reviewed By: reames
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@338990 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the NAN checks suggested in PR37776:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37776
If both operands to maxnum are NAN, that should get constant folded, so we don't
have to handle that case. This is the same assumption as other FP ops in this
function. Returning 'false' is always conservatively correct.
Copying from the bug report:
Currently, we have this for "when is cannotBeOrderedLessThanZero
(mustBePositiveOrNaN) true for maxnum":
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | x |
------------------------
|NaN | x | x | x |
------------------------
The cases with (Neg & NaN) are wrong. We should have:
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | |
------------------------
|NaN | x | | x |
------------------------
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50081
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@338716 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Currently ComputeNumSignBits does early exit while processing some
of the operations (add, sub, mul, and select). This prevents the
function from using AssumptionCacheTracker if passed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49759
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@337936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in LLVM IR in this CL as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" in IR (Under review at D47894).
The CL updates several passes that assumed null pointer dereferencing is
undefined to not optimize when the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: eraman, haicheng, george.burgess.iv, drinkcat, theraven, reames, sanjoy, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47895
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It's a bit neater to write T.isIntOrPtrTy() over `T.isIntegerTy() ||
T.isPointerTy()`.
I used Python's re.sub with this regex to update users:
r'([\w.\->()]+)isIntegerTy\(\)\s*\|\|\s*\1isPointerTy\(\)'
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336462 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@336073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When checking a select to see if it matches an abs, allow the true/false values
to be a sign-extension of the comparison value instead of requiring that they're
directly the comparison value, as all the comparison cares about is the sign of
the value.
This fixes a regression due to r333702, where we were no longer generating ctlz
due to isKnownNonNegative failing to match such a pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47631
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333927 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
The isKnownNonZero() function have checks that abort the recursion when
it reaches the specified max depth. However one of the recursive calls
was placed before the max depth check was done, resulting in a endless
recursion that eventually triggered a segmentation fault.
Fixed the problem by moving the max depth check above the first
recursive call.
Reviewers: Prazek, nlopes, spatel, craig.topper, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hfinkel, bjope, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47531
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333557 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Libfuzzer tests have been fixed to prevent being optimized.
Original commit message:
If the nsw flag is used in the absolute value then it is undefined for INT_MIN. For all other value it will produce a positive number. So we can assume the result is positive.
This breaks some InstCombine abs/nabs combining tests because we simplify the second compare from known bits rather than as the whole pattern. Looks like we can probably fix it by adding a neg+abs/nabs combine to just swap the select operands. N
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47041
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If the nsw flag is used in the absolute value then it is undefined for INT_MIN. For all other value it will produce a positive number. So we can assume the result is positive.
This breaks some InstCombine abs/nabs combining tests because we simplify the second compare from known bits rather than as the whole pattern. Looks like we can probably fix it by adding a neg+abs/nabs combine to just swap the select operands. Need to check alive to make sure there are no corner cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47041
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333226 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Summary:
Patch for capture tracking broke
bootstrap of clang with -fstict-vtable-pointers
which resulted in debbugging nightmare. It was fixed
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46900 but as it turned
out, there were other parts like inliner (computing of
noalias metadata) that I found after bootstraping with enabled
assertions.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith, chandlerc, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47088
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@333070 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
